The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Delegation and Agency in International Organizations
Abstract
Why do states delegate certain tasks and responsibilities to international organizations rather than acting unilaterally or cooperating directly? Furthermore, to what extent do states continue to control IOs once authority has been delegated? Examining a variety of different institutions including the World Trade Organization, the United Nations and the European Commission, this book explores the different methods that states employ to ensure their interests are being served, and identifies the problems involved with monitoring and managing IOs. The contributors suggest that it is not inherently more difficult to design effective delegation mechanisms at international level than at domestic level and, drawing on principal-agent theory, help explain the variations that exist in the extent to which states are willing to delegate to IOs. They argue that IOs are neither all evil nor all virtuous, but are better understood as bureaucracies that can be controlled to varying degrees by their political masters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Can the Politicization of European Integration be Reversed?*
DE WILDE, P., & ZÜRN, M. (2012) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02232.x · Cited by 477
Global horse trading: IMF loans for votes in the United Nations Security Council
Dreher, A., Sturm, J.-E., & Vreeland, J. R. (2009) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.03.002 · Cited by 441
Evolution Without Progress? Humanitarianism in a World of Hurt
Barnett, M. (2009) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818309990087 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2006-09-14
- OpenAlex
- W1605186412
- Cited by
- 1,273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.28
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511491368
- The paper
- Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. (2006). Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511491368
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.