Cited by 109Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationMigration and Exile StudiesBlockchain Technology Applications and Security

Self-Sovereignty for Refugees? The Contested Horizons of Digital Identity

Open access
Cheesman, Margie·2022·Geopolitics

Abstract

This paper critically examines the implications of ‘self-sovereign identity’ (SSI) for border politics and migration management. SSI refers to user-controlled, decentralised forms of digital identification. Closely linked with the distributed ledger technology blockchain, SSI is presented by advocates as a tool to empower marginalised groups, including refugees. Among other benefits, some claim that SSI removes the need for powerful, centralised institutional structures by giving individuals control and ownership of their identity information. However, through ethnographic research in an international aid organisation, I find that SSI is an embryonic technology with indeterminate properties and benefits. I identify a series of competing logics in the debates around SSI’s emancipatory potential, which relate to four issues: (i) the neutrality of the technology, (ii) the capacities of refugees, (iii) global governance and the nation state, and (iv) new economic models for digital identity. SSI is simultaneously the potential enabler of new modes of empowerment, autonomy and data security for refugees and a means of maintaining and extending bureaucratic and commercial power. I situate SSI in a genealogy of systems of identity control and argue that, in practice, it is likely to feed into the powers of corporations and states over refugee populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14650045.2020.1823836

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheesman, M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Cheesman, Margie
Venue
Geopolitics
Published
2020-10-04
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
134-159
ISSN
  • 1465-0045 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3028
OpenAlex
W3090713708
Cited by
109
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10
FWCI
16.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geopolitics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Keywords
self-sovereign identity, digital identity, refugees, blockchain, border politics, migration management, identity control, technological neutrality, global governance, nation-state, digital economy, data security, refugee empowerment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review