Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Archaeological methods for the study of ancient landscapes of the Llanos de Mojos in the Bolivian Amazon

Erickson, Clark L.·1995·Archaeology in the Lowland American Tropics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511521188.004

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Es probable que los canales que regulaban las aguas en los campos de cultivo también se aprovecharan para la cría de peces.

    “Es probable que los canales que regulaban las aguas en los campos de cultivo también se aprovecharon para la cría de peces, tal como se sugiere para otros sitios arqueológicos (Erickson, 1995).”

    From Tumaco-tolita: cultura, arte y poder en la costa pacífica (2017) · cites this paper as Erickson, 1995

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Erickson, C. L.
Venue
Archaeology in the Lowland American Tropics
Published
1995-05-25
Pages
66-95
Cited by
43
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review