The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity
Abstract
The field of theoretical ecology has expanded dramatically in the last few years. This volume gives detailed coverage of the main developing areas in spatial ecological theory, and is written by world experts in the field. Integrating the perspective from field ecology with novel methods for simplifying spatial complexity, it offers a didactical treatment with a gradual increase in mathematical sophistication from beginning to end. In addition, the volume features introductions to those fundamental phenomena in spatial ecology where emerging spatial patterns influence ecological outcomes quantitatively. An appreciation of the consequences of this is required if ecological theory is to move on in the 21st century. Written for reseachers and graduate students in theoretical, evolutionary and spatial ecology, applied mathematics and spatial statistics, it will be seen as a ground breaking treatment of modern spatial ecological theory.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The growing family of the Metabolically Coupled Replicator System (MCRS) models offer a chemically and ecologically feasible spatial mechanism for the robust maintenance of a metabolically active set of different ribozymes attached to mineral surfaces”
From Ecology and Evolution in the RNA World Dynamics and Stability of Prebiotic Replicator Systems (2017) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“Unlike the mean-field version, the stochastic (lattice) implementation of the spatially explicit MCRS model keeps all the metabolic replicators coexistent and shows robust ecological stability (Figure 9) [33,36,37].”
From Ecology and Evolution in the RNA World Dynamics and Stability of Prebiotic Replicator Systems (2017) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“The MCRS models have shown robust ecological stability against changing the replicator degradation rates (which correspond to environmental perturbations), by applying both sequence-length-dependent and -independent decay rates [33,36].”
From Ecology and Evolution in the RNA World Dynamics and Stability of Prebiotic Replicator Systems (2017) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors
Kerr, B., Riley, M. A., Feldman, M. W., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00823 · Cited by 1,593
Spatial analysis a guide for ecologists
Fortin, M., & Dale, M. R. T. (2005) · Cited by 1,214
Evolutionary Dynamics of Biological Games
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093411 · Cited by 1,184
Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists
Fortin, M.-J., & Dale, M. R. T. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511542039 · Cited by 991
Models of cooperation based on the Prisoner's Dilemma and the Snowdrift game
Doebeli, M., & Hauert, C. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00773.x · Cited by 868
Metadata
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2000-05-04
- OpenAlex
- W1586507888
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 22.85
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- spatial ecology, ecological interactions, spatial patterns, spatial complexity, theoretical ecology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review