The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Parental monitoring and peer influences on adolescent substance use
Abstract
Experimentation with drugs and alcohol often begins in early adolescence (if not sooner), with initiation rates for most substances dropping sharply after age 18 (Kandel & Logan, 1984). Use is heavier among males than females (Brook, Lukoff, & Whiteman, 1980; Kandel & Logan, 1984) and is most prevalent among white, middle-class adolescents (Gans, 1990), but drug use remains high among young people from all backgrounds. Indeed, experimentation with alcohol and other drugs is so common among today's young people that it is often considered normative. Numerous studies have focused on understanding the factors that influence young people's patterns of drug use. Two domains of influence in particular have received a great deal of attention: the family and the peer group (Brook et al., 1980; Brook, Whiteman, & Gordon, 1983; Hawkins, Lishner, Catalano, & Howard, 1986). With regard to the first of these domains, researchers have found that adolescents raised by authoritative parents are less likely to engage in substance use (e.g., Baumrind, 1989; Lamborn, Mounts, Steinberg, & Dornbusch, 1991). Authoritative parents are both responsive and demanding toward the adolescent. They are characterized by firm and consistent limit setting, but also by the respect with which they treat their adolescent and the warmth of the parent–child relationship. Studies of selected aspects of authoritative parenting also have found significant relations between particular parenting practices and adolescent substance use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Parental Monitoring: A Reinterpretation
Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00210 · Cited by 2,358
Pinquart, M. (2017) · Developmental psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000295 · Cited by 1,339
Barber (2005) · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2005.00365.x · Cited by 1,063
Lee, S. S., Humphreys, K. L., Flory, K., Liu, R., & Glass, K. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.01.006 · Cited by 875
Family relationships and adolescent pregnancy risk: a research synthesis
Miller, B. C., Benson, B., & Galbraith, K. A. (2001) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1006/drev.2000.0513 · Cited by 568
Metadata
- Authors
- Fletcher, A. C., Darling, N., & Steinberg, L.
- Venue
- Coercion and Punishment in Long-Term Perspectives
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1995-02-24
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 6 Pt 2
- Pages
- 259-271
- OpenAlex
- W1797276733
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.88
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parental monitoring and peer influences on adolescent substance use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511527906.016
- The paper
- Fletcher, A. C., Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1995). Parental monitoring and peer influences on adolescent substance use. Coercion and Punishment in Long-Term Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511527906.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.