The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fire as a controlling process in the North American boreal forest
Abstract
Introduction Major patterns of plant communities and species distribution are induced by various disturbance regimes operating at different spatial and temporal scales (Loucks 1970; White 1979; Bormann & Likens 1979 b ; Delcourt, Delcourt & Webb 1983). The development of temperate forests is controlled by canopy disturbance associated with single and multiple treefalls creating small gaps (Henry & Swan 1974; Oliver & Stephens 1977) and, occasionally, larger gaps along windstorm tracks (Canham & Loucks 1984). In contrast, fire disturbance in the boreal forest creates all sizes of canopy gap, and constitutes one of the most important community processes in vegetation development along complex environmental gradients (Heinselman 1981 b ). At the landscape level, ecological disturbances result in the spatiotemporal development of the vegetation mosaic composed of an assemblage of stand patches of different age, areal extent, and floristic composition (Pickett & White 1985). The boreal forest is one of the world's two largest forest belts; it covers more than 12 6 km 2 (Baumgartner 1979). The North American segment of the circumboreal forest, which constitutes a well-delineated biome both geographically and ecologically (Fig. 5.1), will be analyzed here with respect to fire disturbance. The boreal forest (excluding the Cordilleran region) spans more than 10° of latitude in eastern and western Canada; it is somewhat contracted south of Hudson Bay and James Bay, and in Alaska. At the continent scale, the boreal forest is a floristically poor biome (Takhtajan 1986) with only nine tree species dominating regionally or throughout the range, in coexistence with a subdued under-canopy flora in dense stands and an ubiquitous cryptogamic flora in open stands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of fire in the boreal carbon budget
Harden, J. W., Trumbore, S. E., Stocks, B. J., Hirsch, A., Gower, S. T., O'neill, K. P., & Kasischke, E. S. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.06019.x · Cited by 387
Comparisons between wildfire and forest harvesting and their implications in forest management
McRae, D. J., Duchesne, L. C., Freedman, B., Lynham, T. J., & Woodley, S. (2001) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a01-010 · Cited by 259
Resistance of the boreal forest to high burn rates
Héon, J., Arseneault, D., & Parisien, M.-A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1409316111 · Cited by 170
High-latitude cooling associated with landscape changes from North American boreal forest fires
Rogers, B. M., Randerson, J. T., & Bonan, G. B. (2013) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-10-699-2013 · Cited by 91
Foster, A. C., Armstrong, A. H., Shuman, J. K., Shugart, H. H., Rogers, B. M., Mack, M. C., Goetz, S. J., & Ranson, K. J. (2019) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108765 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Payette, S.
- Venue
- A Systems Analysis of the Global Boreal Forest
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1992-03-05
- Pages
- 144-169
- OpenAlex
- W2990161399
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.47
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fire as a controlling process in the North American boreal forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511565489.006
- The paper
- Payette, S. (1992). Fire as a controlling process in the North American boreal forest. A Systems Analysis of the Global Boreal Forest. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511565489.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.