The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s
Abstract
An ironic dream of a common language for women in the integrated circuit This chapter is an effort to build an ironic political myth faithful to feminism, socialism, and materialism. Perhaps more faithful as blasphemy is faithful, than as reverent worship and identification. Blasphemy has always seemed to require taking things very seriously. I know no better stance to adopt from within the secular-religious, evangelical traditions of U.S. politics, including the politics of socialist feminism. Blasphemy protects one from the Moral Majority within, while still insisting on the need for community. Blasphemy is not apostasy. Irony is about contradictions that do not resolve into larger wholes, even dialectically, about the tension of holding incompatible things together because both or all are necessary and true. Irony is about humor and serious play. It is also a rhetorical strategy and a political method, one I would like to see more honored within socialist feminism. At the center of my ironic faith, my blasphemy, is the image of the cyborg. A cyborg is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction. Social reality is lived social relations, our most important political construction, a world-changing fiction. The international women's movements have constructed “women's experience,” as well as uncovered or discovered this crucial collective object.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
This bridge called my back : writings by radical women of color
Moraga, C. L., & ANZALDÚA, G. E. (2015) · Cited by 4,964
Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · Cited by 2,980
Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts
Austin, J. (1982) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(82)90228-3 · Cited by 2,883
Winner, L. (2017) · Computer Ethics · doi:10.4324/9781315259697-21 · Cited by 2,317
Douglas, M. (1966) · Cited by 2,246
Reflections on Gender and Science
Keller, E. F., & Scharff-Goldhaber, G. (1987) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.15186 · Cited by 1,842
Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought
Carpenter, S. R., & Winner, L. (1978) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3103332 · Cited by 1,531
The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism
Hartsock, N. C. M. (2005) · Synthese Library · doi:10.1007/0-306-48017-4_15 · Cited by 1,469
All the Women are White, All the Blacks are Men, but Some of Us are Brave-- Black Women's Studies.
Dickerson, D. P., Hull, G. T., Scott, P. B., & Smith, B. (1982) · The Journal of Negro Education · doi:10.2307/2294703 · Cited by 1,292
Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory
MacKinnon, C. A. (1982) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/493898 · Cited by 1,230
Cited by
Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses
Mohanty, C. (1988) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.1988.42 · Cited by 4,855
DeNora, T. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511489433 · Cited by 2,705
Davis, K. (2008) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700108086364 · Cited by 2,539
the romance of resistance: tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women
ABU‐LUGHOD, L. (1990) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.1990.17.1.02a00030 · Cited by 2,361
The Empire Strikes Back: A Posttranssexual Manifesto
Stone, S. (1992) · Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies · doi:10.1215/02705346-10-2_29-150 · Cited by 1,011
Metadata
- Authors
- Haraway, D.
- Venue
- The Postmodern Turn
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1994-11-25
- Pages
- 82-116
- OpenAlex
- W1998619251
- Cited by
- 2,034
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 110.68
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511570940.007
- The paper
- Haraway, D. (1994). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. The Postmodern Turn. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511570940.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.