Human Territorial Functioning: An Empirical, Evolutionary Perspective on Individual and Small Group Territorial Cognitions, Behaviors, and Consequences
Abstract
'Territorial functioning' refers to an interlocked system of sentiments, cognitions, and behaviors that are highly place-specific, and socially and culturally determined and maintaining. In this book, Ralph Taylor explores the consequences of human territorial functioning for individuals, small groups, and the ecological systems in which they operate. His exploration is illuminated by his evolutionary perspective, and grounded in empirical studies by social scientists and in theoretical work on the evolution of social and spatial behaviors. He systematically reviews the related research and theory, and indicates the importance of territorial functioning to current social and environmental problems. Contrary to popular wisdom, he argues that territorial functioning is relevant only to limited locations, such as street blocks, and not to neighborhoods or nation states, and that it reduces conflicts and helps maintain settings and groups. His theoretically focused examination of all that has been discovered about human territorial functioning will interest a wide variety of environmental psychologists and designers, urban sociologists, social psychologists, planners, and ethologists, and their students.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Territoriality is most effective at the local level.
“Research on territoriality has shown it to be most effective at the local level (Brown and Altman, 1981;Taylor, 1988;Ratcliffe, 2003)”
From Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): a review and modern bibliography (2005) · cites this paper as Taylor, 1988
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): a review and modern bibliography
Cozens, P. M., Saville, G., & Hillier, D. (2005) · Property Management · doi:10.1108/02637470510631483 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
Territorial Functioning in Collaborative Writing: Fragmented Exchanges and Common Outcomes
Larsen-Ledet, I., & Korsgaard, H. (2019) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-019-09359-8 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Utilizing a Risk of Crime Measure for Recidivism Research: Moving Environmental Corrections Forward
Drawve, G., Caplan, J., & Ostermann, M. (2019) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128718779359 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Taylor, R. B.
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Ralph B.
- ORCID
- Taylor, Ralph B.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1988-08-26
- OpenAlex
- W2031234745
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 14.96
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Place Attachment and Urban Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Keywords
- place attachment, territoriality, evolutionary psychology, social behavior, spatial behavior, neighborhood conflict, small groups, ecosystems, urban sociology, environmental psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review