The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rationality and Intelligence
Abstract
What is intelligence? Can it be increased by teaching? If so, how, and what difference would an increase make? Before we can answer these questions, we need to clarify them. Jonathan Baron argues that when we do so we find that intelligence has much to do with rational thinking, and that the skills involved in rational thinking are in fact teachable, at least to some extent. Rationality and Intelligence develops and justifies a prescriptive theory of rational thinking in terms of utility theory and the theory of rational life plans. The prescriptive theory, buttressed by other assumptions, suggests that people generally think too little and in a way that is insufficiently critical of the initial possibilities that occur to them. However these biases can be - and sometimes are - corrected by education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267
Omission and commission in judgment and choice
Spranca, M., Minsk, E., & Baron, J. (1991) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(91)90011-t · Cited by 1,041
Self-citationSchönemann, P. H. (1985) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0002063x · Cited by 889
Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity
Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960030404 · Cited by 854
Self-citationVarieties of Confirmation Bias
Klayman, J. (1995) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60315-1 · Cited by 755
Metadata
- Authors
- Baron, J.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1985-10-31
- OpenAlex
- W4301215780
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.15
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rationality and Intelligence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511571275
- The paper
- Baron, J. (1985). Rationality and Intelligence. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511571275
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
