The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues
Abstract
Overview This chapter describes various aspects of the Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues useful for understanding the scientific exploitation considered in subsequent chapters. It describes some of the satellite measurement principles relevant for an understanding of the catalogue contents; the published intermediate astrometry data; details of the adopted reference frame; basic transformations relevant to catalogue users; details of the Tycho 2 Catalogue construction; error assessment; and details of associated data such as radial velocities and cross-identifications. The Hipparcos Catalogue contains 118 218 entries, corresponding to an average of some three stars per square degree over the entire sky. Median precision of the five astrometric parameters ( Hp < 9 mag) exceeded the original mission goals, and are between 0.6–1.0 mas. Some 20 000 distances were determined to better than 10%, and 50 000 to better than 20%. The inferred ratio of external to standard errors is ˜1. 0–1. 2, and estimated systematic errors are below 0.1 mas. The number of solved or suspected double or multiple stars is 23 882. Photometric observations yielded multi-epoch photometry with a mean number of 110 observations per star, a median photometric precision ( Hp < 9 mag) of 0.0015 mag, and 11 597 entries were identified as variable or possibly variable. The Tycho Catalogue of just over 1 million stars was superseded in 2000 by the Tycho 2 Catalogue of some 2.5 million stars; both included two-colour photometry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Improved Age Estimation for Solar‐Type Dwarfs Using Activity‐Rotation Diagnostics
Mamajek, E. E., & Hillenbrand, L. A. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/591785 · Cited by 1,313
Wide‐Field Millimagnitude Photometry with the HAT: A Tool for Extrasolar Planet Detection
Bakos, G., Noyes, R. W., Kovács, G., Stanek, K. Z., Sasselov, D. D., & Domsa, I. (2004) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/382735 · Cited by 559
ROTATIONAL AND RADIAL VELOCITIES FOR A SAMPLE OF 761 HIPPARCOS GIANTS AND THE ROLE OF BINARITY
Massarotti, A., Latham, D. W., Stefanik, R. P., & Fogel, J. (2008) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/1/209 · Cited by 422
A SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY AND ANALYSIS OF BRIGHT, HYDROGEN-RICH WHITE DWARFS
Gianninas, A., Bergeron, P., & Ruiz, M. T. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/743/2/138 · Cited by 347
A Reappraisal of The Habitability of Planets around M Dwarf Stars
Tarter, J. C., Backus, P. R., Mancinelli, R. L., Aurnou, J. M., Backman, D. E., Basri, G. S., Boss, A. P., Clarke, A., Deming, D., Doyle, L. R., et al. (2007) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2006.0124 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Venue
- Astronomical Applications of Astrometry
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2008-12-04
- Pages
- 1-53
- OpenAlex
- W1541242752
- Cited by
- 905
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 489.15
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511575242.002
- The paper
- The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues. (2008). Astronomical Applications of Astrometry. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511575242.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.