The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Death and the Regeneration of Life
Abstract
It is a classical anthropological paradox that symbols of rebirth and fertility are frequently found in funerary rituals throughout the world. The original essays collected here re-examine this phenomenon through insights from China, India, New Guinea, Latin America, and Africa. The contributors, each a specialist in one of these areas, have worked in close collaboration to produce a genuinely innovative theoretical approach to the study of the symbolism surrounding death, an outline of which is provided in an important introduction by the editors. The major concern of the volume is the way in which funerary rituals dramatically transform the image of life as a dialectic flux involving exchange and transaction, marriage and procreation, into an image of a still, transcendental order in which oppositions such as those between self and other, wife-giver and wife-taker, Brahmin and untouchable, birth and therefore death have been abolished. This transformation often involves a general devaluation of biology, and, particularly, of sexuality, which is contrasted with a more spiritual and controlled source of life. The role of women, who are frequently associated with biological processes, mourning and death pollution, is often predominant in funerary rituals, and in examining this book makes a further contribution to the understanding of the symbolism of gender. The death rituals and the symbolism of rebirth are also analysed in the context of the political processes of the different societies considered, and it is argued that social order and political organisation may be legitimated through an exploitation of the emotions and biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Boyer, P., & Liénard, P. (2006) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x06009332 · Cited by 601
Ritual and Its Consequences: An Essay on the Limits of Sincerity
Seligman, A. B., Weller, R. P., Puett, M., & Simon, B. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195336009.001.0001 · Cited by 416
Kwon, H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807596 · Cited by 411
Baumard, N., & Boyer, P. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.04.003 · Cited by 230
“thus are our bodies, thus was our custom”: mortuary cannibalism in an Amazonian society
CONKLIN, B. A. (1995) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.1995.22.1.02a00040 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1982-12-30
- OpenAlex
- W620917160
- Cited by
- 1,047
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.80
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Death and the Regeneration of Life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511607646
- The paper
- Death and the Regeneration of Life. (1982). Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511607646
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.