The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Indirect speech acts
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The simplest cases of meaning are those in which the speaker utters a sentence and means exactly and literally what he says. In such cases the speaker intends to produce a certain illocutionary effect in the hearer, and he intends to produce this effect by getting the hearer to recognize his intention to produce it, and he intends to get the hearer to recognize this intention in virtue of the hearer's knowledge of the rules that govern the utterance of the sentence. But, notoriously, not all cases of meaning are this simple: In hints, insinuations, irony, and metaphor – to mention a few examples – the speaker's utterance meaning and the sentence meaning come apart in various ways. One important class of such cases is that in which the speaker utters a sentence, means what he says, but also means something more. For example, a speaker may utter the sentence “I want you to do it” by way of requesting the hearer to do something. The utterance is incidentally meant as a statement, but it is also meant primarily as a request, a request made by way of making a statement. In such cases a sentence that contains the illocutionary force indicators for one kind of illocutionary act can be uttered to perform, in addition , another type of illocutionary act.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,394
Exploring the Process of Inference Generation in Sarcasm: A Review of Normal and Clinical Studies
McDonald, S. (1999) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2124 · Cited by 139
Lancker-Sidtis, D. V., & Rallon, G. (2004) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2004.02.003 · Cited by 137
Information-Structural Semantics for English Intonation
Steedman, M. J. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4796-1_13 · Cited by 136
Simple and complex deceits and ironies
Bosco, F. M., & Bucciarelli, M. (2007) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.004 · Cited by 128
Short-circuited implicature: A negative contribution
Horn, L. R., & Bayer, S. (1984) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/bf00631074 · Cited by 126
Communication in context: Effects of speaker status on the comprehension of indirect requests.
Holtgraves, T. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.20.5.1205 · Cited by 126
Walker, M. A., Cahn, J. E., & Whittaker, S. (1997) · doi:10.1145/267658.267680 · Cited by 126
When terminology matters: The imperative as a comparative concept
Jary, M., & Kissine, M. (2016) · Linguistics · doi:10.1515/ling-2015-0039 · Cited by 125
“Indirect speech acts can famously be “conventionalized” (Searle 1975b; Morgan 1978; Bach and Harnish 1979; Bach 1998).”
BackgroundSpeech acts and questionnaires: The effect of hearer response
Rose, K. R. (1992) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(92)90028-a · Cited by 123
Language Sample Collection and Analysis
Evans, J. L., & Craig, H. K. (1992) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.3502.343 · Cited by 121
Elements of a Plan-Based Theory of Speech Acts
Cohen, P. R., & Perrault, C. R. (2003) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-44972-0_1 · Cited by 118
Respecifying Display Questions: Interactional Resources for Language Teaching.
Lee, Y.-A. (2006) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/40264304 · Cited by 119
Selective Pragmatic Impairment in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Indirect Requests Versus Irony
Deliens, G., Papastamou, F., Ruytenbeek, N., Geelhand, P., & Kissine, M. (2018) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3561-6 · Cited by 124
A cross‐cultural comparison of implicit theories of requesting
Kim, M., & Wilson, S. R. (1994) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759409376334 · Cited by 117
“These three strategies seem to vary along several contextual features, including illocutionary transparency or opacity (Searle, 1975), syntactic directness (Becker, Kimmel, & Bevill, 1989), politeness (Brown & Levinson, 1978), imperative force or coerciveness (Jordan & Roloff, 1990), syntactic features (Carrell & Konn…”
BackgroundGrounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts
Hernández, L. P., & de Mendoza, F. J. R. (2002) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(02)80002-9 · Cited by 115
Processing Conversational Implicatures: Alternatives and Counterfactual Reasoning
van Tiel, B., & Schaeken, W. (2016) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12362 · Cited by 115
Pragmatic development in a foreign language: A study of Greek FL requests
Bella, S. (2012) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.014 · Cited by 112
How to make requests that overcome obstacles to compliance
Francik, E., & Clark, H. H. (1985) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(85)90046-4 · Cited by 110
Asher, N. M., & Lascarides, A. (2001) · Synthese · doi:10.1023/a:1010340508140 · Cited by 121
Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language
Chapman, S., & Routledge, C. (2005) · Edinburgh University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780748680801 · Cited by 108
Conversation Electrified: ERP Correlates of Speech Act Recognition in Underspecified Utterances
Gisladottir, R. S., Chwilla, D. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120068 · Cited by 108
On so-called ‘rhetorical’ questions
Schmidt-Radefeldt, J. (1977) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(77)90029-7 · Cited by 108
Political Equivocation: A Situational Explanation
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Bryson, L., et al. (1988) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x8800700204 · Cited by 108
Terkourafi, M. (2011) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.003 · Cited by 107
Argument as a natural category: The routine grounds for arguing in conversation
Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S. (1981) · Western Journal of Speech Communication · doi:10.1080/10570318109374035 · Cited by 107
On the myth of rising intonation in polar questions
Geluykens, R. (1988) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(88)90006-9 · Cited by 111
Nineteenth-century English politeness
Culpeper, J., & Demmen, J. (2011) · Journal of Historical Pragmatics · doi:10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.03cul · Cited by 109
Trancribing infinity: Problems of context presentation
Cook, G. (1990) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(90)90061-h · Cited by 105
Schmid, H. (2016) · Cognitive Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cog-2016-0048 · Cited by 105
Tutor and student assessments of academic writing tutorials: What is “success”?
Thonus, T. (2002) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00002-3 · Cited by 104
Lee-Wong, S. M. (2015) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.4.4.01lee · Cited by 106
Industrial Agents: Emerging Applications of Software Agents in Industry
Leito, P., & Karnouskos, S. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · Cited by 103
15. Norms and principles. Putting social and cognitive pragmatics together
Escandell‐Vidal, V. (2004) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.123.27esc · Cited by 103
Conceptualizing organizational discourse as situated symbolic action
Heracleous, L., & Marshak, R. J. (2004) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726704048356 · Cited by 103
Yu, M.-C. (2005) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309050480010501 · Cited by 103
Customer perception of the deceptiveness of online product reviews: A speech act theory perspective
Ansari, S., & Gupta, S. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102286 · Cited by 108
Other Than Counting Words: A Linguistic Approach to Content Analysis
Roberts, C. W. (1989) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/68.1.147 · Cited by 102
The history and future of direct manipulation
Frohlich, D. M. (1993) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449299308924396 · Cited by 101
Intonation and Discourse: Biased Questions
Asher, N. M., & Reese, B. (2007) · Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) · Cited by 100
Irony, quotation, and other forms of staged intertextuality
Kotthoff, H. (2002) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.9.13kot · Cited by 100
“Searle (1975) considers irony to be an example of nonliteral language.”
BackgroundKamp, H. (1978) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9775-2_9 · Cited by 100
A Coherence-Based Approach to the Interpretation of Non-Sentential Utterances in Dialogue
Schlangen, D. (2003) · ERA · Cited by 99
Hernández, L. P. (2013) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2013.02.001 · Cited by 99
A sociopragmatic study of apology speech act realization patterns in Persian
Afghari, A. (2007) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2007.01.003 · Cited by 99
Neuropragmatics: Neuropsychological Constraints on Formal Theories of Dialogue
Bara, B. G., Tirassa, M., & Zettin, M. (1997) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1812 · Cited by 100
“Since their literal interpretation cannot be ruled out in principle, forms like [8] are indeed considered prototypical indirect speech acts, to the point that most of the examples discussed in philosophy of language (Searle 1975), artificial intelligence (Perrault & Allen 1980) and neuropsychology (Foldi 1987; Hirst,…”
BackgroundModeling the illocutionary aspects of information-seeking dialogues
Sitter, S., & Stein, A. (1992) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/0306-4573(92)90044-z · Cited by 98
McGowan, M. K. (2008) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048400802370334 · Cited by 97
Indirectness and politeness in Turkish–German bilingual and Turkish monolingual requests
Martı, L. (2005) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.05.009 · Cited by 97
Bowers, J., & Churcher, J. (1988) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/62266.62277 · Cited by 97
“…seen utterances like Can I have two pints of Abbott and 4 grapefruit and a whisky? and Have you got Embassy Gold? as so-called indirect speech acts and have sought mechanisms by which speakers and hearers might derive an underlying direct form from them typically by a p:ocess of inference [22].”
BackgroundMitigation as modification of illocutionary force
Thaler, V. (2012) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.001 · Cited by 96
Take Their Word for It: The Symbolic Role of Linguistic Style Matches in User Communities1
Ludwig, S., de Ruyter, K., Mahr, D., Wetzels, M. G. M., Brüggen, E. C., & Ruyck, T. D. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.12 · Cited by 95
Ackerman, B. P. (1982) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129149 · Cited by 95
The Pragmatics of Mathematics Education: Vagueness and Mathematical Discourse
Rowland, T. (1999) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 95
The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation
Haugh, M. (2006) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.004 · Cited by 95
“And I Think That Is a Very Straightforward Way of Dealing With It”
Fetzer, A. (2008) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x08322481 · Cited by 94
Performative Facial Expressions in Animated Faces
Poggi, I., & Pélachaud, C. (2000) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2697.003.0008 · Cited by 98
Cuff, R. N. (1980) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(80)80016-2 · Cited by 94
Automatic intention recognition in conversation processing☆
Holtgraves, T. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.001 · Cited by 93
Indirectness and Politeness in Mexican Requests
Félix‐Brasdefer, J. C. (2005) · Cited by 93
Dialogue Models for Inquiry and Transaction
Hulstijn, J. (2000) · University of Twente Research Information · doi:10.3990/1.9789036514408 · Cited by 94
Yu, M.-C. (2015) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.9.2.04yu · Cited by 92
Language and Social Interaction
Maynard, D. W., & Peräkylä, A. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-36921-x_10 · Cited by 93
Pursuing a Response by Repairing an Indexical Reference
Bolden, G. B., Mandelbaum, J., & Wilkinson, S. (2012) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.673380 · Cited by 91
Identifying Seekers and Suppliers in Social Media Communities to Support Crisis Coordination
Purohit, H., Hampton, A. J., Bhatt, S., Shalin, V. L., Sheth, A., & Flach, J. M. (2014) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-014-9209-y · Cited by 99
How directive constructions emerge: Grammaticalization, constructionalization, cooptation
Mauri, C., & Sansò, A. (2011) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.001 · Cited by 90
Dialogue games: Conventions of human interaction
Mann, W. C. (1988) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/bf00128990 · Cited by 90
Pragmatics and the Philosophy of Language
Bach, K. (2006) · doi:10.1002/9780470756959.ch21 · Cited by 90
Pragmatic Aspects of Grammatical Constructions
Kay, P. (2006) · doi:10.1002/9780470756959.ch30 · Cited by 90
“Morgan (1978:269ff) termed that kind of strictly interpretational construction a convention of usage, following Searle (1975).”
BackgroundPragmatic Approaches (Im)politeness
Culpeper, J., & Terkourafi, M. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_2 · Cited by 90
Speech Acts in Discourse Context
Roberts, C. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198738831.003.0012 · Cited by 89
“For example, here’s the taxonomy from Searle (1975): Assertives: Commit the speaker to the truth of a proposition: suggesting, putting forward, swearing, boasting, concluding.”
BackgroundInfluentialWhen promises become Contracts: Implied contracts and handbook provisions on job security
Parks, J. M., & Schmedemann, D. A. (1994) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.3930330309 · Cited by 87
Shariati, M., & Chamani, F. (2009) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.007 · Cited by 87
On Searle [on Austin] on language
Rajagopalan, K. (2000) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/s0271-5309(00)00007-0 · Cited by 87
Clayman, S. E. (2014) · Cited by 87
The power of negation in English: Text, context and relevance
Jordan, M. P. (1998) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(97)00086-6 · Cited by 89
Panther, K.-U. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139021463.023 · Cited by 84
Caponetto, L. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1805-9 · Cited by 86
Jacobs, S. (1989) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/bf00182603 · Cited by 88
“Minister, we will see how the public judges you.”
Fetzer, A. (2005) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.017 · Cited by 85
Yes-No Questions as Wh-Questions
Kiefer, F. (1980) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1_5 · Cited by 86
The time course of sense creation
Gerrig, R. J. (1989) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197069 · Cited by 83
Baumgarten, N., Meyer, B., & Özçetin, D. (2008) · Across Languages and Cultures · doi:10.1556/acr.9.2008.2.2 · Cited by 84
Strategy and structure in conversational influence attempts
Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S. (1983) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637758309390171 · Cited by 86
Chakrabarti, C., & Luger, G. F. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.067 · Cited by 83
Identifying action: Laughter in non-humorous reported speech
Clift, R. (2012) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.005 · Cited by 82
Towards a typology of modifiers for the speech act of requesting: a socio-pragmatic approach
Soler, E. A., Martínez‐Flor, A., & Jordà, M. P. S. (2005) · Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada · Cited by 81
Comprehension of non-conventional indirect requests: An event-related brain potential study
Seana Coulson, A., & Lovett, C. (2010) · The Italian Journal of Linguistics · Cited by 81
Clause-type, primary illocution, and mood-like operators in English
Allan, K. (2005) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2004.12.001 · Cited by 80
Marked Initial Pitch in Questions Signals Marked Communicative Function
Sicoli, M. A., Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2014) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/0023830914529247 · Cited by 81
Poggi, I. (2005) · Pragmatics & Cognition · doi:10.1075/pc.13.2.04pog · Cited by 80
A Lexical-Constructional Model Account of Illocution
Hernández, L. P., & Ibáñez, F. J. R. D. M. (2011) · Vial-vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics · Cited by 79
22. Corpus-based pragmatics II: quantitative studies
Rühlemann, C. (2011) · Mouton eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110214260.629 · Cited by 79
Mutual knowledge and the psychology of conversational inference
Gibbs, R. W. (1987) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(87)90180-9 · Cited by 81
Walsh, R. (1997) · Poetics Today · doi:10.2307/1773184 · Cited by 77
“…acts of assertion is the canonical speech act treatment; and if the implication of a narrator is not quite self-evident in Searle‟s pretence formula, it may arguably be present in another description, “imitating the making of an assertion,” which he offers as equivalent (Searle 1975b: 324).”
BackgroundGumperz and Interactional Sociolinguistics
Gordon, C. (2011) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446200957.n6 · Cited by 78
Developmental Pragmatics in Normal and Abnormal Children
Bara, B. G., Bosco, F. M., & Bucciarelli, M. (1999) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2125 · Cited by 78
How performatives really work: A reply to searle
Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1992) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/bf00635834 · Cited by 78
Communicative acts for explanation generation
Maybury, M. T. (1992) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/0020-7373(92)90083-w · Cited by 78
Pearson, L. (2006) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00427.x · Cited by 77
Idiom Acquisition and Processing by Second/Foreign Language Learners
Cieślicka, A. B. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139342100.012 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Searle, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- John Rogers Searle
- Venue
- Expression and Meaning
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1979-10-31
- Pages
- 30-57
- OpenAlex
- W2995748625
- Cited by
- 1,393
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 285.41
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Keywords
- indirect speech acts, illocutionary force, illocutionary acts, speech act theory, utterance meaning, requests, hints, insinuation, irony, metaphor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
