The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Indirect speech acts
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The simplest cases of meaning are those in which the speaker utters a sentence and means exactly and literally what he says. In such cases the speaker intends to produce a certain illocutionary effect in the hearer, and he intends to produce this effect by getting the hearer to recognize his intention to produce it, and he intends to get the hearer to recognize this intention in virtue of the hearer's knowledge of the rules that govern the utterance of the sentence. But, notoriously, not all cases of meaning are this simple: In hints, insinuations, irony, and metaphor – to mention a few examples – the speaker's utterance meaning and the sentence meaning come apart in various ways. One important class of such cases is that in which the speaker utters a sentence, means what he says, but also means something more. For example, a speaker may utter the sentence “I want you to do it” by way of requesting the hearer to do something. The utterance is incidentally meant as a statement, but it is also meant primarily as a request, a request made by way of making a statement. In such cases a sentence that contains the illocutionary force indicators for one kind of illocutionary act can be uttered to perform, in addition , another type of illocutionary act.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,394
Discourse Markers as Indicators of Register
Brizuela, M., Andersen, E. S., & Stallings, L. M. (1999) · Hispania · doi:10.2307/346098 · Cited by 32
Portouli, E., Nathanael, D., & Marmaras, N. (2014) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.952349 · Cited by 32
Georgalidou, M. (2007) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.08.009 · Cited by 36
Terkourafi, M. (2011) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.006 · Cited by 31
Fallis, D. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.13 · Cited by 30
Functional proposition: A new concept for representing discourse meaning?
Jaszczolt, K. M. (2020) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.010 · Cited by 31
The implications of studying politeness in Spanish-speaking contexts
Bravo, D. (2015) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.18.4.02bra · Cited by 31
(Im)politeness and Sociopragmatics
Culpeper, J., & Haugh, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108954105.018 · Cited by 34
Pragmatic Choice in Conversation
Gibbs, R. W., & Orden, G. C. V. (2012) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01172.x · Cited by 31
Intelligent agents as a basis for natural language interfaces
Chin, D. N., & Wilensky, R. (1987) · Cited by 31
Language Use and Social Interaction
Maynard, D. W., & Turowetz, J. J. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_9 · Cited by 32
The pragmatic functions of the recitation of Qur’anic verses by Muslims in their oral genre
Nazzal, A. R. (2005) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.15.2-3.05naz · Cited by 30
"Thank You for Sharing that Interesting Fact!"
Williams, T., Thames, D., Novakoff, J., & Scheutz, M. J. (2018) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3171221.3171246 · Cited by 32
“Such non-literal utterances, known as indirect speech acts (ISAs) [39], are used to achieve a variety of socio-cultural goals (e.”
BackgroundPezzulo, G. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development · doi:10.1109/tamd.2011.2166261 · Cited by 29
Harmful Speech in Intergroup Encounters: An Organizational Framework for Communication Research
Leets, L., & Giles, H. (1999) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.1999.11678960 · Cited by 30
Singapore English: A semantic and cultural perspective
Wierzbicka, A. (2003) · Multilingua · doi:10.1515/mult.2003.018 · Cited by 30
Metaphor as Categorization: A Connectionist Implementation
Thomas, M. S. C., & Denis Mareschal, B. (2001) · Metaphor and Symbol · doi:10.1080/10926488.2001.9678883 · Cited by 30
The effect of formality and relational tone on supervisor/subordinate negotiation episodes
Meiners, E. B., & Miller, V. D. (2004) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570310409374803 · Cited by 30
Bernie and the Donald: A Comparison of Left- and Right-Wing Populist Discourse
Macaulay, M. I. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97388-3_6 · Cited by 29
Li, L. X. (2022) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2022.2050457 · Cited by 33
Giving advice on a consumer‐run warm line: Implicit and dilemmatic practices
Pudlinski, C. (1998) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510979809368542 · Cited by 29
Directiness and deference in pharmacy students' messages to physicians
Lambert, B. L. (1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)e0096-b · Cited by 29
A Situational Theory of Disqualification: Using Language to “Leave the Field”
Bavelas, J. B. (1985) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5074-6_11 · Cited by 28
Young children's sensitivity to direct and indirect request structure
Ledbetter, P. J., & Dent, C. H. (1988) · First Language · doi:10.1177/014272378800802402 · Cited by 28
Responding to pre-requests: The organisation of hai x ‘do you have x’ sequences in Italian
Rossi, G. (2015) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.008 · Cited by 28
Discourse Structures of Condolence Speech Act
Moghaddam, M. M. (2013) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 28
Routing email automatically by purpose not topic
KHOSRAVI, H., & Wilks, Y. A. (1999) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324999002119 · Cited by 28
Macaulay, M. I. (2015) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.6.4.02mac · Cited by 28
Learning Pragmatics through Computer-Mediated Communication in Taiwan
Eslami, Z. R., & Liu, C. N. (2013) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 27
Análise pragmática das respostas de crianças com e sem distúrbio específico de linguagem
Rocha, L. C., & Befi‐Lopes, D. M. (2006) · Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica · doi:10.1590/s0104-56872006000300002 · Cited by 27
On Attenuation in Verbal Family Conflict
Vuchinich, S. (1986) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2786767 · Cited by 27
Bilingual Figurative Language Processing
Cieślicka, A. B. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64099-0_4 · Cited by 28
Craig, H. K. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7156-2_6 · Cited by 27
Makatchev, M., Jordan, P., & VanLehn, K. A. (2004) · Journal of Automated Reasoning · doi:10.1007/s10817-004-4857-0 · Cited by 27
Litman, D. J. (1986) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) · doi:10.3115/981131.981161 · Cited by 27
The Use of Question Types to Match Questions in FAQFinder
Lytinen, S. L., & Tomuro, N. (2002) · Cited by 27
Meaning and Contrastive Stress
Boër, S. E. (1979) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184509 · Cited by 27
“(Searle's theory of indirect speech acts (Searle [14]) is a paradigm of the beneficial results”
BackgroundContemporary Approaches to the Philosophy of Lying
Mahon, J. E. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.3 · Cited by 27
Attitudes, Innuendo, and Regulators: Challenges of Interpretation
Metzger, M., & Fleetwood, E. (2005) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 26
Metaphor: From Fixedness and Selection to Differentiation and Creation
Shanon, B. (1992) · Poetics Today · doi:10.2307/1773293 · Cited by 26
REQUEST MODIFICATION IN THE PRAGMATIC PRODUCTION OF INTERMEDIATE ESP LEARNERS
Halupka-Rešetar, S. (2014) · Cited by 26
Toward Computational Recognition of Humorous Intent
Taylor, J. M., & Mazlack, L. J. (2005) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 26
Sound, sign and meaning. Quinquagenary of the prague linguistic circle
Galton, H. (1978) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/0024-3841(78)90080-3 · Cited by 26
Some Remarks on Explicit Performatives, Indirect Speech Acts, Locutionary Meaning and Truth-Value
Récanati, F. (1980) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1_9 · Cited by 26
To whom it may concern : adressee identification in face-to-face meetings
Jovanović, N. (2007) · Cited by 26
Persian requests: Redress of face through indirectness
Nodoushan, M. A. S. (2008) · Cited by 25
Linguistic structures in social interaction
Mushin, I., & Doehler, S. P. (2021) · Interactional Linguistics · doi:10.1075/il.21008.mus · Cited by 31
Linguistic mechanisms of power in Nineteen Eighty-Four: Applying politeness theory to Orwell's world
Ermida, I. (2005) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.05.008 · Cited by 25
Speech Act Theory and the Study of Argumentation
Henkemans, A. F. S. (2014) · Studies in Logic Grammar and Rhetoric · doi:10.2478/slgr-2014-0002 · Cited by 25
The Pragmatic Knowledge of Turkish EFL Students in Using Certain Request Strategies
Kılıçkaya, F. (2010) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · Cited by 25
Well if that had been true, that would have been perfectly reasonable
Fetzer, A. (2007) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.006 · Cited by 25
Novick, D., & Ward, K. M. (1993) · Cited by 25
Kotthoff, H. (1998) · KOPS (University of Konstanz) · Cited by 25
On relevance again: From philosophy of language across ‘pragmatics and power’ to global relevance
Kitis, E. (1999) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00090-3 · Cited by 24
Directness of advice giving in traditional Chinese medicine consultations
Yip, J. W. C. (2020) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.016 · Cited by 24
Kihlstrom, J. F. (2002) · Prevention & Treatment · doi:10.1037/1522-3736.5.1.536c · Cited by 24
Towards Automated Personality Identification Using Speech Acts
Appling, D. S., Briscoe, E., Hayes, H., & Mappus, R. L. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i2.14469 · Cited by 25
Dialogues on Bakhtin: Interdisciplinary Readings
Lähteenmäki, M., Dufva, H., Peuranen, E., et al. (1998) · Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) · Cited by 24
Burdelski, M. J. (2015) · Text and Talk · doi:10.1515/text-2015-0017 · Cited by 24
“…Matthew Burdelski Brought to you by | EP Ipswich Authenticated Download Date | 10/12/15 11:03 AM speech the mother positions Chie as the addressee and encourages her to interpret it as a request to pick up the book – in traditional pragmatic research, an indirect speech act (Searle 1975).”
Asking Questions: Some Characteristics of Successful Sales Encounters
Schuster, C. P., & Danes, J. E. (2013) · Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management · Cited by 24
Can you predict responses to yes/no questions? yes, no, and stuff
Hockey, B. A., Rossen-Knill, D. F., Spejewski, B., et al. (1997) · European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech) · doi:10.21437/eurospeech.1997-597 · Cited by 24
A semantic metalanguage for the description and comparison of illocutionary meanings
Wierzbicka, A. (1986) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(86)90100-1 · Cited by 24
Computational Approaches to the Pragmatics Problem
Cummins, C., & de Ruiter, J. D. (2014) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12072 · Cited by 10
“Searle (1975) tells a slightly different 176 story: on his account, the ‘natural’ answer to the question “Could you pass the salt?” (namely: 177 yes, the hearer could do so) must be relevant to the speaker.”
BackgroundSuggestions in British and American English: A Corpus-Linguistic Study
Flöck, I. (2011) · Cited by 23
Maier, E. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.23 · Cited by 23
Stokke, A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.20 · Cited by 23
“Those are Your Words, Not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment
Boogaart, R., Jansen, H., & van Leeuwen, M. (2020) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-020-09521-3 · Cited by 23
In/directness in Polish children's requests at the dinner table
Ogiermann, E. (2015) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.007 · Cited by 23
Relevance theory and language change
Clark, B. (2016) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2015.12.007 · Cited by 23
The Comprehension of Indirect Requests: Previous Work and Future Directions
Ruytenbeek, N. (2017) · Logic, argumentation & reasoning · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32247-6_17 · Cited by 23
Pragmeme, adaptability, and elasticity in online medical consultations
Tseng, M.-Y., & Zhang, G. Q. (2018) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.004 · Cited by 24
Martín, F. J. B. (2001) · Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense · doi:10.5209/rev_eiuc.2001.n9.8992 · Cited by 23
Performative utterances: A reply to Bach and Harnish
Reimer, M. (1995) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/bf00983301 · Cited by 23
Postcolonialism and translation: the dialectic between theory and practice
Bandia, P. F. (2021) · Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series – Themes in Translation Studies · doi:10.52034/lanstts.v2i.81 · Cited by 23
Language and the young stutterer: A new look at old theories and findings
Homzie, M. J., & Lindsay, J. S. (1984) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(84)90092-0 · Cited by 23
Young Children's Responses to Direct and Indirect Directives
Elrod, M. M. (1983) · The Journal of Genetic Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221325.1983.10533555 · Cited by 23
Improvising Linguistic Style: Social and Affective Bases for Agent PersonalityPreprint
Walker, M. A., Cahn, J. E., & Whittaker, S. (1997) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cmp-lg/9702015 · Cited by 23
Stage Structure and Stage Salience for Event Semantics
Caudal, P. (2005) · Studies in natural language and linguistic theory · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3033-9_11 · Cited by 22
Terkourafi, M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.29 · Cited by 22
Dietz, S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.22 · Cited by 22
First order and second order indirectness in Korean and Chinese
Chen, X., & Wang, J. (2021) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.022 · Cited by 22
ACOUSTIC-PROSODIC DISAMBIGUATION OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT SPEECH ACTS
Nickerson, J. S., & Chu‐Carroll, J. (1999) · Cited by 22
Requests and politeness in Vietnamese as a native language
Nguyen, T. T. M., & Ho, G. A. L. (2015) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.23.4.05ngu · Cited by 22
New perspectives on bias in polar questions
Gyuris, B. (2016) · International Review of Pragmatics · doi:10.1163/18773109-00000003 · Cited by 22
Banikalef, A. A. A. (2019) · International Journal of Arabic-English Studies · doi:10.33806/ijaes2000.19.2.9 · Cited by 22
Researching Politeness: From the ‘Classical’ Approach to Discourse Analysis … and Back
Baider, F. H., Cislaru, G., & Claudel, C. (2020) · Corpus Pragmatics · doi:10.1007/s41701-020-00088-8 · Cited by 22
On exclamatory-inversion sentences in English
Huddleston, R. (1993) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/0024-3841(93)90025-r · Cited by 22
Negotiating confrontation: The problematic nature of initiation and response
Newell, S. E., & Stutman, R. K. (1989) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351818909389319 · Cited by 22
MWEs as non-propositional content indicators
Shudo, K., Tanabe, T., Takahashi, M., et al. (2004) · doi:10.3115/1613186.1613191 · Cited by 22
Dialogue-Games: Metacommunication Structures for Natural Language Interaction
Levin, J. A., & Moore, J. A. (1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-934613-63-7.50041-3 · Cited by 22
Sequentiality of speech acts in conversational structure
Jose, P. E. (1988) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/bf01067181 · Cited by 22
Interactive user modeling: An integrative explicit-implicit approach
Shifroni, E., & Shanon, B. (1992) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/bf01101109 · Cited by 22
Modelling Speech Acts in Conversational Discourse
Schiffrin, A. (2005) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 22
Indirect requests, relevance, and politeness
Ruytenbeek, N. (2019) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.007 · Cited by 21
Chałupnik, M., & Atkins, S. (2020) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.014 · Cited by 22
Compliments in English and Persian interaction: A cross-cultural perspective
Karimnia, A., & Afghari, A. (2011) · University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) · Cited by 21
Virtual Impression Networks for Capturing Deep Impressions
Taura, T., Yamamoto, E., Fasiha, M. Y. N., et al. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0510-4_30 · Cited by 21
Interrogative clauses in English and the social economics of questions
Siemund, P. (2017) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.010 · Cited by 21
Arab News and Conflict: A multidisciplinary discourse study
Bazzi, S. (2009) · Cited by 21
Indeterminacy in process type classification
Gwilliams, L., & Fontaine, L. (2015) · Functional Linguistics · doi:10.1186/s40554-015-0021-x · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Searle, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- John Rogers Searle
- Venue
- Expression and Meaning
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1979-10-31
- Pages
- 30-57
- OpenAlex
- W2995748625
- Cited by
- 1,393
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 285.41
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Keywords
- indirect speech acts, illocutionary force, illocutionary acts, speech act theory, utterance meaning, requests, hints, insinuation, irony, metaphor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review