The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Memory, Development, and Rationality: An Integrative Theory of Judgment and Decision Making
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The rational-thinking tendencies measured by these heuristics-and-biases tasks are probably multifarious (Reyna, Lloyd, & Brainerd, 2003;Stanovich, 2009bStanovich, , 2011;;Stanovich, West, & Toplak, 2011).”
From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Reyna, Lloyd, & Brainerd, 2003
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reyna, V. F., & Farley, F. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x · Cited by 1,244
Self-citationHow numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.
Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K. J., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0017327 · Cited by 1,172
Self-citationThe Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1 · Cited by 1,047
On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672 · Cited by 840
Mindful Judgment and Decision Making
Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163633 · Cited by 782
Metadata
- Authors
- Reyna, V. F., Lloyd, F. J., & Brainerd, C. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Venue
- Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2003-06-16
- Pages
- 201-245
- OpenAlex
- W1719870044
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 9.48
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- judgment and decision making, memory, cognitive development, rationality, integrative theory, cognitive psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
