The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal
Abstract
Preferences constitute one of the fundamental sources of social and individual stability and change. They give our lives direction and our actions meaning. They influence ideological values, political commitments, the marketplace, kinship structures, and cultural norms. They are sources of attachment and antagonism, of alliance and conflict. No species would evolve if it could not actively discriminate between objects, events, and circumstances that are beneficial and those that are harmful. Preferences are formed by diverse processes. Some objects, by their inherent properties, induce automatic attraction or aversion. Sucrose is attractive virtually at birth, whereas bitter substances – quinine, for example – are universally aversive. Preferences may also be established by classical or operant conditioning. If a child is rewarded when she sits in a particular corner of the crib, that corner will become a preferred location for her. An office worker whose colleagues notice his new tie will develop a preference for similar ties. Preferences can also be acquired by virtue of imitation, a social process that emerges in fashions. Preferences also arise from conformity pressures. In economics, preference is regarded as the product of rational choice – a deliberate computation that weighs the pros and cons of alternatives. But among the many ways in which preferences may be acquired, there is one that is absurdly simple, much simpler than rational choice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1996) · Cited by 3,692
Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition.
Lazarus, R. S. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.37.9.1019 · Cited by 1,618
Feeling and thinking: the role of affect in social cognition
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-5959 · Cited by 1,384
Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect.
Zajonc, R. B. (2000) · Cited by 333
Self-citationAdditivity of nonconscious affect: Combined effects of priming and exposure.
Murphy, S. T., Monahan, J. L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.589 · Cited by 238
Self-citationBornstein, R. F., Leone, D. R., & Galley, D. J. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.6.1070 · Cited by 227
Stimulus recognition may mediate exposure effects.
Birnbaum, M. H., & Mellers, B. A. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.391 · Cited by 47
Cited by
Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective
Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3137597.3137600 · Cited by 3,304
Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms
Juslin, P. N., & Västfjäll, D. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x08005293 · Cited by 1,914
A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x · Cited by 1,558
Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders
Barlow, D. H., Allen, L. B., & Choate, M. L. (2004) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80036-4 · Cited by 1,430
Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news
Pennycook, G., Cannon, T. D., & Rand, D. G. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000465 · Cited by 1,268
Metadata
- Authors
- Zajonc, R. B.
- Venue
- The Construction of Preference
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2006-08-28
- Pages
- 464-470
- OpenAlex
- W2344952903
- Cited by
- 936
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 34.34
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511618031.026
- The paper
- Zajonc, R. B. (2006). Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal. The Construction of Preference. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511618031.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.