The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Feeling and thinking: the role of affect in social cognition
Abstract
1. Introduction: the role of affect in social cognition Joseph P. Forgas Part I. Fundamental Issues: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition: 2. Nonconscious and noncognitive affect Robert Zajonc 3. Challenge and threat: the interplay of affect and cognition Jim Blascovich and Wendy Berry Mendes 4. Affect and appraisal Craig A. Smith and Leslie D. Kirby Part II. The Informational Role of Affect: 5. Cognitive and clinical perspectives on mood dependent memory Eric Eich and Dawn Macauley 6. Some conditions affecting overcorrection of the judgment-distorting influence of one's feelings Leonard Berkowitz, Sara Jaffee, Eunkyung Jo and Bartholomeu T. Troccoli 7. Mood as input: a configural view of mood effects Leonard L. Martin 8. Affective forecasting and durability bias: the problem of the invisible shield Dan Gilbert Part III. Affect and Information Processing: 9. Mood and general knowledge structures: happy moods and their impact on information processing Herbert Bless 10. A connectionist approach to understanding the impact of mood on cognitive functions of assimilation and accommodation 11. The role of different processing strategies in mediating mood effects on cognition Joseph P. Forgas Part IV. Affect and Social Knowledge Structures: 12. Self-organization in emotional contexts Carolin Showers 13. Prologues to a unified theory of affect, attitudes, stereotypes, and self-concept Anthony Greenwald 14. Interpersonal emotions, social cognition, and self-relevant thought Mark Leary 15. Emotional response categorization Paula Niedenthal 16. Integration and conclusions Joseph P. Forgas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.355 · Cited by 5,881
Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x · Cited by 3,885
Framing student engagement in higher education
Kahu, E. R. (2013) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505 · Cited by 2,103
Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.4.305 · Cited by 1,946
Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment.
Chemers, M. M., Hu, L.-T., & Garcia, B. F. (2001) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.55 · Cited by 2,031
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 37-5959-37-5959
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1605236966
- Cited by
- 1,384
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feeling and thinking: the role of affect in social cognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.37-5959
- The paper
- Feeling and thinking: the role of affect in social cognition. (2000). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-5959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.