The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Laws of Nature
Abstract
John Carroll undertakes a careful philosophical examination of laws of nature, causation, and other related topics. He argues that laws of nature are not susceptible to the sort of philosophical treatment preferred by empiricists. Indeed he shows that emperically pure matters of fact need not even determine what the laws are. Similar, even stronger, conclusions are drawn about causation. Replacing the traditional view of laws and causation requiring some kind of foundational legitimacy, the author argues that these phenomena are inextricably intertwined with everything else. This distinctively clear and detailed discussion of what it is to be a law will be valuable to a broad swathe of philosophers in metaphysics, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of science.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“But this appears to be false; there appear to be worlds that match in their mosaics but differ in their laws.”
From Nomothetic Explanation and Humeanism about Laws of Nature (2020) · cites this paper as Carroll (1994, pp. 57-67)
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation
Woodward, J. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195155270.001.0001 · Cited by 1,302
Grounding in the image of causation
Schaffer, J. (2015) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-014-0438-1 · Cited by 554
Libertarian Accounts of Free Will
Clarke, R. (2003) · doi:10.1093/019515987x.001.0001 · Cited by 477
Levine, J. (2001) · doi:10.1093/0195132351.001.0001 · Cited by 481
Moore, M. S. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199256860.001.0001 · Cited by 536
Fine, K. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199278709.001.0001 · Cited by 299
(2005) · doi:10.1093/0199278709.003.0009 · Cited by 250
CETERIS PARIBUS, THERE IS NO PROBLEM OF PROVISOS
Earman, J., & Roberts, J. M. (1999) · Synthese · doi:10.1023/a:1005106917477 · Cited by 209
David Lewis's Humean Theory of Objective Chance
Loewer, B. (2004) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/428015 · Cited by 149
Laws for Metaphysical Explanation
Schaffer, J. (2017) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12111 · Cited by 133
It is the Business of Laws to Govern
Schaffer, J. (2016) · dialectica · doi:10.1111/1746-8361.12165 · Cited by 110
Fine, K. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199278709.003.0008 · Cited by 108
The Properties of Mental Causation
Robb, D. (1997) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1467-9213.00054 · Cited by 96
Special Sciences, Conspiracy and the Better Best System Account of Lawhood
Callender, C., & Cohen, J. (2010) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-010-9241-3 · Cited by 95
What the Humean Should Say About Entanglement
Bhogal, H. K., & Perry, Z. R. (2015) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12095 · Cited by 92
Fine, K. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199278709.003.0010 · Cited by 90
Trumping and contrastive causation
Hitchcock, C. (2010) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9799-y · Cited by 84
4 Prior on the Construction of Possible Worlds and Instants
Fine, K. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199278709.003.0005 · Cited by 83
I—The Presidential AddressPhilosophical Scepticism and the Aims of Philosophy
Beebee, H. (2017) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) · doi:10.1093/arisoc/aox017 · Cited by 83
Nomothetic Explanation and Humeanism about Laws of Nature
Bhogal, H. (2020) · Oxford Studies in Metaphysics Volume 12 · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192893314.003.0006 · Cited by 74
Governing Without A Fundamental Direction of Time: Minimal Primitivism about Laws of Nature
Chen, E. K., & Goldstein, S. (2022) · Jerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96775-8_2 · Cited by 69
Tugby, M., & Mumford, S. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674527.001.0001 · Cited by 69
Do the laws of physics forbid the operation of time machines?
Earman, J., Smeenk, C., & Wüthrich, C. (2008) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9338-2 · Cited by 70
Universals, laws, and governance
Tugby, M. (2015) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0521-2 · Cited by 65
Adlam, E. (2022) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-022-00546-0 · Cited by 60
Structures of Scientific Theories
Craver, C. F. (2002) · doi:10.1002/9780470756614.ch4 · Cited by 60
Does Anything Hold the Universe Together?
Beebee, H. (2006) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-005-0576-2 · Cited by 58
Causal Powers and Laws of Nature
Ellis, B. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9229-1_2 · Cited by 58
Marshall, D. (2015) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0462-9 · Cited by 58
Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Conceptions of Causation
Menzies, P. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9229-1_21 · Cited by 55
Earman, J., & ROBERTS, J. T. (2005) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00428.x · Cited by 54
Martin, B., & Hjortland, O. T. (2020) · Journal of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/s10992-020-09566-5 · Cited by 53
A disposition-based process-theory of causation
Hüttemann, A. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674527.003.0005 · Cited by 49
A Counterfactual Analysis of the Concepts of Logical Truth and Necessity
Lange, M. (2005) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-005-7774-0 · Cited by 47
Why do the Laws Support Counterfactuals?
Dorst, C. (2020) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-019-00207-1 · Cited by 41
Laws, Counterfactuals, Stability, and Degrees of Lawhood
Lange, M. (1999) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/392686 · Cited by 40
The nomological argument for the existence of God
Hildebrand, T., & Metcalf, T. (2022) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12364 · Cited by 38
Earman, J., & ROBERTS, J. T. (2005) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00449.x · Cited by 38
Could the Laws of Nature Change?*
Lange, M. (2008) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/587823 · Cited by 37
Lewis, Carroll, and seeing through the looking glass
Roberts, J. (1998) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048409812348541 · Cited by 36
Natural Properties, Necessary Connections, and the Problem of Induction
Hildebrand, T. (2016) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12351 · Cited by 36
Roberts, J. T. (2001) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/392901 · Cited by 35
Nonlinearity and metaphysical emergence
Wilson, J. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674527.003.0010 · Cited by 31
Laws for Metaphysical Explanation
Schaffer, J. (2018) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246118000164 · Cited by 31
Humeanism about laws of nature
Bhogal, H. K. (2020) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12696 · Cited by 31
Humeanism without Humean Supervenience: A Projectivist Account of Laws and Possibilities
Ward, B. (2002) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1023/a:1014583323702 · Cited by 30
Woodward, J. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674527.003.0003 · Cited by 29
Non‐Humean theories of natural necessity
Hildebrand, T. (2020) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12662 · Cited by 28
Humean Laws and (Nested) Counterfactuals
Loew, C., & Jaag, S. (2019) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqz037 · Cited by 27
Why Water Is Not H2O, and Other Critiques of Essentialist Ontology from the Philosophy of Chemistry
VandeWall, H. (2007) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/525632 · Cited by 26
The Logic of Interactive Biorobotics
Datteri, E. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00637 · Cited by 26
No Work for a Theory of Universals
Eddon, M., & Meacham, C. J. G. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781118398593.ch9 · Cited by 25
Bhogal, H. (2017) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2016.1241289 · Cited by 28
Hildebrand, T. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009109949 · Cited by 23
Scientific Law: A Perspectival Account
Halpin, J. (2003) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1023/a:1022029912912 · Cited by 23
Builes, D., & Teitel, T. (2022) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.1111/phpe.12171 · Cited by 22
Scientific Practice and the Epistemology of Governing Laws
Hildebrand, T. (2019) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2019.8 · Cited by 22
Mumford, S. D. (2005) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-005-5873-2 · Cited by 22
How to carve across the joints in nature without abandoning Kripke–Putnam semantics
Beebee, H. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674527.003.0007 · Cited by 21
Why contingent facts cannot necessities make
Lange, M. (2008) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/68.2.120 · Cited by 21
Counterfactuals all the way down?
Woodward, J., Loewer, B., Carroll, J. W., & Lange, M. (2010) · Metascience · doi:10.1007/s11016-010-9437-9 · Cited by 21
Self-citationSometimes The World is Not Enough: The Pursuit of Explanatory Laws in a Humean World
Ward, B. (2003) · Pacific philosophical quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0114.00169 · Cited by 20
Lange on essentialism, counterfactuals, and explanation
Handfield, T. (2005) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048400500044249 · Cited by 20
Fine, K. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199278709.003.0003 · Cited by 20
Builes, D. (2023) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-023-01927-5 · Cited by 19
The Governing Conception of Laws
Emery, N. (2023) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.2272 · Cited by 18
“Laws of Nature” as an Indexical Term: A Reinterpretation of Lewis's Best-System Analysis
Roberts, J. M. (1999) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/392748 · Cited by 18
Leibniz's Two Realms Revisited
McDonough, J. K. (2008) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.00696.x · Cited by 17
Lange, M. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470696590.ch26 · Cited by 16
The Temporal Asymmetry of Causation
Fernandes, A. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108914765 · Cited by 16
No laws and (thin) powers in, no (governing) laws out
Ioannidis, S., Livanios, V., & Psillos, S. (2020) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-020-00304-x · Cited by 16
Vranas, P. B. M. (2002) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1023/a:1020986112495 · Cited by 16
Laudisa, F. (2015) · International Studies in the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1080/02698595.2015.1179038 · Cited by 15
Causation, ‘Humean’ Causation and Emptiness
Siderits, M. (2013) · Journal of Indian Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10781-013-9206-3 · Cited by 14
Approximations, Idealizations, and Models in Statistical Mechanics
Liu, C. (2004) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1023/b:erke.0000012883.07507.32 · Cited by 13
Carroll, J. W., & Wentz, L. (2003) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00455091.2003.10716546 · Cited by 13
Self-citationWhat Makes Time Different from Space?
Skow, B. (2007) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00645.x · Cited by 13
Hildebrand, T. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2019.41 · Cited by 13
1 Reference, Essence, and Identity
Fine, K. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199278709.003.0002 · Cited by 13
Nominalist dispositional essentialism
Vogt, L. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03588-z · Cited by 12
Sartorio, C. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61136-1_9 · Cited by 12
Chen, E. K. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009026390 · Cited by 17
Builes, D. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780198924159.003.0002 · Cited by 12
A Counterfactual Theory of Causal Explanation
Woodward, J. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195155270.003.0005 · Cited by 12
Are All Primitives Created Equal?
Miller, J. T. M. (2018) · The Southern Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/sjp.12279 · Cited by 11
Tugby, M. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1036-x · Cited by 11
Physical modality, laws, and counterfactuals
Woodward, J. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1400-5 · Cited by 11
Lewis, Thau, and Hall on Chance and the Best-System Account of Law
Halpin, J. (1998) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/392643 · Cited by 11
A puzzle about natural laws and the existence of God
Frederick, D. (2012) · International Journal for Philosophy of Religion · doi:10.1007/s11153-012-9343-8 · Cited by 10
Fine, K. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199278709.003.0004 · Cited by 10
Fundamental Properties and the Laws of Nature
Demarest, H. (2015) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12222 · Cited by 9
How to explain the Lorentz transformations
Lange, M. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674527.003.0004 · Cited by 9
Shumener, E. (2022) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.1111/phpe.12168 · Cited by 9
Laws, Explanation, Governing, and Generation1
Ward, B. (2007) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048400701654853 · Cited by 9
THE DISPOSITIONALIST DEITY: HOW GOD CREATES LAWS AND WHY THEISTS SHOULD CARE
Page, B. (2015) · Zygon® · doi:10.1111/zygo.12150 · Cited by 9
The Nomic Likelihood Account of Laws
Meacham, C. J. G. (2023) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.2265 · Cited by 8
Some Laws of Nature are Metaphysically Contingent
Roberts, J. T. (2009) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048400903159016 · Cited by 8
Introduction What is the metaphysics of science?
Mumford, S. D., & Tugby, M. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674527.003.0001 · Cited by 7
Woodward, J. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195155270.003.0002 · Cited by 6
Are natural kinds and natural properties distinct?
Tobin, E. (2013) · Metaphysics and Science · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674527.003.0008 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Carroll, J. W.
- Corresponding author
- Carroll, John W.
- ORCID
- Carroll, John W.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1994-02-25
- OpenAlex
- W4245724896
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- laws of nature, causality, empiricism, matters of fact, foundationalism, metaphysics of law, philosophy of mind, philosophy of science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review