The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Models as mediating instruments
Abstract
Models are one of the critical instruments of modern science. We know that models function in a variety of different ways within the sciences to help us to learn not only about theories but also about the world. So far, however, there seems to be no systematic account of how they operate in both of these domains. The semantic view as discussed in the previous chapter does provide some analysis of the relationship between models and theories and the importance of models in scientific practice; but, we feel there is much more to be said concerning the dynamics involved in model construction, function and use. One of the points we want to stress is that when one looks at examples of the different ways that models function, we see that they occupy an autonomous role in scientific work. In this chapter we want to outline, using examples from both the chapters in this volume and elsewhere, an account of models as autonomous agents , and to show how they function as instruments of investigation. We believe there is a significant connection between the autonomy of models and their ability to function as instruments. It is precisely because models are partially independent of both theories and the world that they have this autonomous component and so can be used as instruments of exploration in both domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cartwright, N. (1983) · doi:10.1093/0198247044.001.0001 · Cited by 2,082
The History of Econometric Ideas
Morgan, M. S. (1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511522109 · Cited by 1,062
Self-citationModels and Analogies in Science
HESSE, M. B. (1965) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 904
Hughes, R. I. G. (1997) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/392611 · Cited by 465
Mathematical Models: Questions of Trustworthiness
Morton, A. (1993) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/44.4.659 · Cited by 150
Modelling nature : Between physics and the physical world
Morrison, M. (1998) · Cited by 74
Self-citationThe Early History of the Box Diagram
Humphrey, T. M. (1996) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 13
Cited by
Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.08.002 · Cited by 788
Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690110110142 · Cited by 465
Mediating instruments and making markets: Capital budgeting, science and the economy
Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (2007) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.003 · Cited by 398
Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk
Miller, P., Kurunmäki, L., & O’Leary, T. (2008) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.005 · Cited by 395
Modelling and representing: An artefactual approach to model-based representation
Knuuttila, T. (2011) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.034 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrison, M., & Morgan, M. S.
- Venue
- Models as Mediators
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1999-10-21
- Pages
- 10-37
- OpenAlex
- W2280255230
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 42.01
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Models as mediating instruments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511660108.003
- The paper
- Morrison, M., & Morgan, M. S. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. Models as Mediators. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511660108.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.