The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) to be attained from others
Abstract
Introduction In this chapter we will discuss some implications of the distributed nature of knowledge for the study and for the teaching of epistemological beliefs. We will elaborate on the following argument: due to the division of labor in modern societies, knowledge is distributed and used unevenly. Most knowledge claims are based on specialized knowledge provided by specialized experts, and the knowledge is organized into disciplines, reflecting such specialization. In the following chapter, the uneven distribution and use of knowledge is called “division of cognitive labor.” Because much of our knowledge is acquired from others, most everyday epistemological issues regard the assessment of knowledge claims made by others who are experts for issues we are not experts for. Improving epistemological judgments, therefore, requires the improvement of a person's capacity to understand how specialized knowledge is distributed (who knows what) and to evaluate expert sources (whom to believe). In the first part of this chapter the notion of the “division of cognitive labor” is explained. Secondly, how the uneven distribution of cognitive labor and the dependency from experts has been conceived in research on epistemological beliefs will be discussed. The well-known dimensions “source” and “justification of knowledge” will take the section's center stage. The dimension “source” describes knowledge which is not constructed by the knower and implies a rather negative view on experts’ knowledge. The dimension “justification of knowledge” refers to beliefs necessary for the assessment of experts’ knowledge claims, but the “sophisticated” subject is mostly conceived of as overcoming the division of cognitive labor.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is because nonexperts are most likely not able to directly evaluate the knowledge claims that are put forward in scientific publications (see also Bromme et al., 2010 and the notion of firsthand and secondhand evaluations).”
From A Randomized Controlled Study on the Effectiveness of Plain Language Summaries of Psychological Meta-Analyses (2025) · cites this paper as Bromme et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–146 of 146
Schoor, C., Rouet, J., & Britt, M. A. (2023) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000849 · Cited by 5
Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3563 · Cited by 4
Self-citationLondra, F., Politti, M. E., & Saux, G. (2020) · PSICOLOGÍA UNEMI · doi:10.29076/issn.2602-8379vol4iss7.2020pp40-52p · Cited by 5
Structured learning diary and epistemic beliefs predict academic achievement in higher education
Kivimäki, V. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1153618 · Cited by 4
Fick, J., Rudolph, L., & Hendriks, F. (2025) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102121 · Cited by 8
Bromme, R., & Kienhues, D. (2012) · Acatech-Diskussion · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33994-3_10 · Cited by 4
Self-citationEngineering students’ justifications for their selections in structured learning diaries
Kivimäki, V., Ketonen, E. E., & Lindblom‐Ylänne, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1223732 · Cited by 4
Scharrer, L., Britt, M. A., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2012) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 4
Self-citationScience and Health Journalism in the Digital Age and Its Implications on Public Trust
Schröder, J. T., & Guenther, L. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49084-2_20 · Cited by 3
Markauskaitė, L., & Goodyear, P. (2016) · Professional and practice-based learning · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4369-4_7 · Cited by 3
Attitudes Towards Science During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Wingen, T., Lecuona, O. Z., & Dohle, S. (2022) · European Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.47368/ejhc.2022.105 · Cited by 3
Interpretation of evolution as part of science popularization in natural history museums
Barkaszi, Z., Kovalchuk, O., & Maliuk, A. (2021) · Geo&Bio · doi:10.15407/gb2104 · Cited by 3
Epistemological Beliefs and Students’ Adaptive Perception of Task Complexity
Bromme, R., Pieschl, S., & Stahl, E. (2014) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-536-6_8 · Cited by 3
Self-citationWas muss man tun, um sicher die richtige Lösung zu finden?
Porsch, T., Bromme, R., & Pollmeier, J. (2010) · Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1026/0049-8637/a000009 · Cited by 3
Self-citationSchneider, J. M., Rosman, T., Kelava, A., & Merk, S. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/43ec2 · Cited by 3
Fachfremd unterrichten nach der Ausbildung: Wissen und Angstempfinden angehender Lehrkräfte
Porsch, R. (2016) · BzL - Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung · doi:10.36950/bzl.34.2016.9501 · Cited by 2
Wie Menschen mit konfligierenden Informationen umgehen
Abendroth, J., Feulner, L., & Richter, T. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58695-2_13 · Cited by 2
Knuth-Herzig, K., Horz, H., & Isberner, M.-B. (2017) · Psychologische Rundschau · doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000365 · Cited by 2
Down to a r/science: Integrating Computational Approaches to the Study of Credibility on Reddit
Hubner, A. Y., McKnight, J., Sweitzer, M. D., & Bond, R. M. (2021) · Computational Communication Research · doi:10.5117/ccr2021.1.004.hubn · Cited by 3
Mangione, A. M. (2021) · SciComm Report · doi:10.32457/scr.v1i1.660 · Cited by 2
Primary Teachers' Mathematical Beliefs and Practices in the Maldives
Adam, M. S. (2012) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.16999222.v1 · Cited by 2
Individual Differences Influence the Degree of Source Expertise Bias in Syllogistic Reasoning
Boucher, L. (2014) · doi:10.22215/etd/2014-10349 · Cited by 2
Molina, J. E. S. (2024) · European Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.59324/ejahss.2024.1(3).26 · Cited by 1
Ferguson, L. E. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1452854 · Cited by 1
Hubner, A. Y., Coronel, J. C., Ott, J. M., Sweitzer, M. D., & Lerner, S. (2025) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502251339693 · Cited by 1
Gill, A., Kirby, C. K., Sorensen, A. E., Smith, C. R., & Dauer, J. M. (2026) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2026.2614364 · Cited by 1
Informelles Lernen im Internet
Abendroth, J., & Richter, T. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-66608-1_10 · Cited by 1
Defining the Problem: Four Epistemic Projects in Professional Work and Education
Markauskaitė, L., & Goodyear, P. (2016) · Professional and practice-based learning · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4369-4_3 · Cited by 1
The Role of Epistemic Monitoring in Language Comprehension
Isberner, M.-B. (2015) · Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) · Cited by 1
Die Struktur epistemologischer Überzeugungen : empirische und theoretische Analysen
Klopp, E. (2014) · Publications of the UdS (Saarland University) · doi:10.22028/d291-23379 · Cited by 1
Critical reflections on the research of epistemological beliefs.
Klopp, E., & Stark, R. (2014) · doi:10.13140/2.1.3512.4804
Bromme, R., Scharrer, L., Britt, M. A., & Stadtler, M. (2011) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Self-citationIoannou, K., & Christodoulou, N. (2017) · Preschool and Primary Education · doi:10.12681/ppej.14282
Lin, F., & Chan, C. (2017) · The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong)
Discussions on Teachers’ Conceptions on the Phenomena of Knowledge, Knowing and Knowledge Creation
Tan, Y. H., & Tan, S. C. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3564-2_8
Epistemological Domain Versus Classroom Practice in the Didactics of English
Lozada, H. R. (2018)
General Literacy in a Digital World
Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_45
Self-citationSmart but evil? Student-teachers perception of educational researchers’ epistemic trustworthiness.Preprint
Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2018) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/cduqe
ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ SENARYO TEMELLİ ÇELİŞKİLİ BİLİMSEL İDDİALARI AÇIKLAMA TERCİHLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ
Avaroğulları, A. K., & Çam, A. (2023) · Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.18069/firatsbed.1171638
Fachfremd unterrichten nach der Ausbildung: Wissen und Angstempfinden angehender Lehrkräfte
Porsch, R. (2016) · BzL - Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung · doi:10.36950/bzl.34.3.2016.9501
Leveraging Psychological Insights for Effective Science Communication
Rosman, T., Edelsbrunner, P. A., Hendriks, F., Vaupotič, N., & Wingen, T. (2025) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000584
Exploring Bloom’s Taxonomy as a Bridge to Evaluativism
Bendixen, L. D., Winsor, D. L., & Frazier, R. (2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-68123-950-720251012
Mieg, H. A., Horrer, A., Berndt, M., Deicke, W., Dinter, J., Gess, C., Purrer, A., Reichow, I., Rueß, J., Sailer, M., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1650687
Alajoki, R., Kiel, K., Bender, H., Duong, K., Taneja, P., Dreyer, E., Eco, S., Laoprasert, M., Saroyan, A., Wolff, L., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1648972
Hao, P. N., & Hung, T. Q. (2026) · Studies in the Education of Adults · doi:10.1080/02660830.2026.2676452
Metadata
- Authors
- Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Porsch, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Münster (DE)
- Venue
- Personal Epistemology in the Classroom
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2010-01-28
- Pages
- 163-194
- OpenAlex
- W369650640
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 22.41
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- epistemological beliefs, distributed knowledge, division of cognitive labor, epistemic trust, expert knowledge, epistemic sources, justification of knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
