The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology
Abstract
In 1932, Cambridge University Press published Remembering, by psychologist, Frederic Bartlett. The landmark book described fascinating studies of memory and presented the theory of schema which informs much of cognitive science and psychology today. In Bartlett's most famous experiment, he had subjects read a Native American story about ghosts and had them retell the tale later. Because their background was so different from the cultural context of the story, the subjects changed details in the story that they could not understand. Based on observations like these, Bartlett developed his claim that memory is a process of reconstruction, and that this construction is in important ways a social act. His concerns about the social psychology of memory and the cultural context of remembering were long neglected but are finding an interested and responsive audience today. Now reissued in paperback, Remembering has a new Introduction by Walter Kintsch of the University of Colorado, Boulder.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Items 101–116 of 116
Community Psychology in Britain
Burton, M., Boyle, S., Psy, C. H. D. C., & Kagan, C. (2007) · International Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-49500-2_11 · Cited by 56
Memory for Expectation-Violating Concepts: The Effects of Agents and Cultural Familiarity
Porubanova, M., Shaw, D. J., McKay, R., & Xygalatas, D. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090684 · Cited by 48
Contamination of facial memory through exposure to misleading composite pictures.
Jenkins, F., & Davies, G. (1985) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.164 · Cited by 44
Predictors and Outcomes of Relational and Transactional Psychological Contract
Aggarwal, U., & Bhargava, S. (2010) · Psychological Studies · doi:10.1007/s12646-010-0033-2 · Cited by 43
Zaromb, F. M., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0018277 · Cited by 43
A Discursive Psychological Approach to Positioning
Korobov, N. (2010) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780880902822321 · Cited by 38
Süssenbach, P., Eyssel, F., & Bohner, G. (2013) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260512475317 · Cited by 34
Ketchum, E. M. (2006) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02247.x · Cited by 31
Practice Cannot be Reduced to Theory: Knowledge, Representations, and Change in the Workplace
Clancey, W. J. (1995) · Organizational Learning and Technological Change · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-79550-3_2 · Cited by 25
What Violent Offenders Remember of their Crime: Empirical Explorations ∗
Evans, C. (2006) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01833.x · Cited by 25
Religion as a Complex and Dynamic System
Cho, F., & Squier, R. K. (2013) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lft016 · Cited by 25
The “Saying Is Repeating” Effect: Dyadic Communication Can Generate Cultural Stereotypes
Bratanova, B., & Kashima, Y. (2014) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2013.874326 · Cited by 19
Rubin, D. C., & Boals, A. (2010) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2010.490787 · Cited by 15
Gaskin, S., Tardif, M., & Mumby, D. G. (2011) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2011.06.001 · Cited by 11
Discourse measures for Basque summary grading
Zipitria, I., Arruarte, A., & Elorriaga, J. (2013) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2011.606503 · Cited by 7
Retrieval Practice Versus Elaborative Encoding: A Systematic and Meta-analytic Review
Gonçalves, A. D. O., Muniz, B. F. B., & Jaeger, A. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10076-6 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartlett, F. C., & Kintsch, W.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1995-06-30
- OpenAlex
- W1493772365
- Cited by
- 2,376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.58
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
