The DOI matches its Crossref record; 170 of the 185 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive Linguistics
Abstract
Cognitive Linguistics argues that language is governed by general cognitive principles, rather than by a special-purpose language module. This introductory textbook surveys the field of cognitive linguistics as a distinct area of study, presenting its theoretical foundations and the arguments supporting it. Clearly organised and accessibly written, it provides a useful introduction to the relationship between language and cognitive processing in the human brain. It covers the main topics likely to be encountered in a course or seminar, and provides a synthesis of study and research in this fast-growing field of linguistics. The authors begin by explaining the conceptual structures and cognitive processes governing linguistic representation and behaviour, and go on to explore cognitive approaches to lexical semantics, as well as syntactic representation and analysis, focusing on the closely related frameworks of cognitive grammar and construction grammar. This much-needed introduction will be welcomed by students in linguistics and cognitive science.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to Conceptual Metaphor Theory, which derives from the field of cognitive linguistics, these attributions designated not only rhetorical figures, but also concepts, understood as organizational units of world knowledge (Lakoff and Johnson 1980;Lakoff 2006;Croft and Cruse 2004: 193-221).”
From Conceptualizations of the Moon (2024) · cites this paper as Croft and Cruse 2004
Citations
Cites
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. P. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 13,358
(1995) · Cited by 6,864
Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9 · Cited by 5,933
The contemporary theory of metaphor
Lakoff, G. P. (1993) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173865.013 · Cited by 5,676
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Constraints on variables in syntax
Ross, J. R. (1967) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 4,102
Pustejovsky, J. D. (1995) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195136975.003.0018 · Cited by 3,959
Rosch, E. H. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781032633275-4 · Cited by 3,852
Retrieval time from semantic memory
Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(69)80069-1 · Cited by 3,265
Information Structure and Sentence Form
Lambrecht, K. (1994) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620607 · Cited by 3,206
Research works printed but not linked: 85
- Zager, David. 1980. A real-time process model of morphological change. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York
- Poplack, Shana. 1996. The sociolinguistic dynamics of apparent convergence. Towards a social science of language: papers in honor of William Labov, vol. 1: variation and change in language and society, ed. Gregory Guy, John Baugh and Deborah Schiffrin, 295–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
- Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Togia, Pagona. 1996. Antonyms in English and Modern Greek: a cognitive approach. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, University of Manchester
- Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum and Ivan Sag. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1980. Culture and value, trans. P. Winch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Wilson, Deirdre. 1975. Presuppositions and non-truth-conditional semantics. New York: Academic Press
- Janda, Richard D. 1990. Frequency, markedness and morphological change: on predicting the spread of noun-plural -s in Modern High German and West Germanic. Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL '90), 136–53. Columbus: The Ohio State University
- Hampton, James. 1997. Psychological representation of concepts. Cognitive models of memory, ed. Martin A. Conway, 81–107. Hove: Psychology Press
- Quine, Willard van Orman. 1951 [1961]. Two dogmas of empiricism. From a logical point of view (2nd ed.), 20–46. New York: Harper. (Originally published in Philosophical Review 60:20–43, 1951.)
- Perlmutter, David M. (ed.). 1983. Studies in relational grammar 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Matthews, Peter H. 1981. Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Lakoff, George and Eve Sweetser. 1994. Foreword to Gilles Fauconnier, Mental Spaces, ix–xlvi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Heidegger, Martin. 1927 [1962]. Being and time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper and Row. (Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Neomarius Verlag.)
- Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1989. Truth and method, trans. William Glen-Doepel, ed. John Cumming and Garrett Barden, translation rev. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. London: Sheed & Ward
- Cruse, 1994, Prototype theory and lexical relations, Rivista di Linguistica, 6, 167
- Fillmore, 1986a, «U»-semantics, second round, Quaderni di semantica, 7, 49
- Sadock, Jerrold M. and Arnold Zwicky. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1: clause structure, ed. Timothy Shopen, 155–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Wierzbicka, Anna. 1988. The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins · DOI
- Fauconnier, 1986, Quantification, roles, and domains, Versus, 44/45, 61
- Bolinger, 1992, About furniture and birds, Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 111
- 10.1207/s15516709cog2103_1 · DOI
- Taylor, John R. 2002. Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Langacker, Ronald W. 1991a. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: descriptive application. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
- Aronoff, Mark. 1993. Morphology by itself: items and inflectional classes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Cruse, 2002a, Microsenses, default specificity and the semantics-pragmatics boundary, Axiomathes, 1, 1
- Cruse, D. Alan 1990. Prototype theory and lexical semantics. Meanings and prototypes: studies in linguistic categorization, ed. Savas L. Tzohatzidis, 382–402. London: Routledge
- Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. The view from Building 20, ed. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Fillmore, Charles J. 1975. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. Cathy Cogen et al., 123–31. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society
- Labov, William. 1973. The boundaries of words and their meanings. New ways of analyzing variation in English, ed. Joshua Fishman, 340–73. Washington D. C.: Georgetown University Press
- Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
- Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness and time: the flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Barlow, Michael and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information
- Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Tsukiashi, Ayumi. 1997. A usage-based analysis of the Japanese passive construction. M.A. dissertation, University of Manchester
- Bresnan, Joan (ed.). 1982. The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Hudson, Richard. 1984. Word grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
- Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: the cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Clahsen, 1992, Inflectional rules in children's grammar: evidence from the development of participles in German, Yearbook of Morphology, 1992, 1
- Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
- Langacker, 1976, Semantic representations and the linguistic relativity hypothesis, Foundations of Language, 14, 307
- Chafe, Wallace (ed.). 1980. The pear stories. New York: Ablex
- Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. The new psychology of language, vol. 2, ed. Michael Tomasello, 211–42. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Bolinger, Dwight. 1971. The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
- Turner, Mark. 1987. Death is the mother of beauty: mind, metaphor, criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Berlin, Brent and Paul Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press
- Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
- Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3 · DOI · Paper page
- Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun phrase antecedents. New York: Routledge
- Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional syntax: anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Croft, William. 2003b. In preparation. Verbs: aspect and argument structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Talmy, Leonard. 1972. Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley
- Taylor, John R. 1989 [1997]. Linguistic categorization: prototypes in linguistic theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Fauconnier, Gilles and Eve Sweetser (ed.). 1996. Spaces, worlds and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Wood, Mary McGee. 1993. Categorial grammars. London: Routledge
- Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 1994. The poetics of mind: figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Jespersen, Otto. 1942. A modern English grammar on historical principles, vol. 6. London: Allen & Unwin
- McCawley, James D. 1981 [1993]. Everything that linguists have always wanted to know about logic (but were ashamed to ask) (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Turner, 1990, Aspects of the invariance hypothesis, Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 247
- Hawkinson, 1974, Natural hierarchies of topic in Shona, Studies in African Linguistics, 5, 147
- Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985 [1994]. Mental Spaces (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Larsen, Thomas W. and William M. Norman. 1979. Correlates of ergativity in Mayan grammar. Ergativity, ed. Frans Plank, 347–69. New York: Academic Press
- Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1991. Being-in-the-world: a commentary of Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Hayes, Victoria. 2001. A comparative analysis of antonymy and hybrid anto-complementarity in English and German within a cognitive framework. Ph. D. thesis, University of Manchester
- Herskovits, Annette. 1986. Language and spatial cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. Introduction to government and binding theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell
- Kant, Immanuel. 1790 [1952]. The critique of judgement, trans. J. C. Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Kritik der Urteilskraft. Berlin: Bey Lagarde und Friederich.)
- Cruse, 1995, Towards a cognitive model of antonymy, Lexicology, 1, 113
- Lyons, John. 1963. Structural semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Daugherty, K. and Mark Seidenberg. 1992. Rules or connections? The past tense revisited. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 259–64. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum
- Husserl, Edmund. 1948 [1973]. Experience and judgement, trans. James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press. (Erfahrung und Urteil, ed. Ludwig Landgrebe. Hamburg: Claassen & Goverts.)
- Lakoff, George. 1996. Moral politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Ricoeur, Paul. 1978. The metaphorical process as cognition, imagination and feeling. On metaphor, ed. Sheldon Sacks, 141–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Cruse, D. Alan., Franz Hundsnurscher, Michael Job and Peter Lutzeier (eds.). 2002. Lexicology: an international handbook on the nature and structure of words and vocabularies. (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, 21.1.) Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
- Lobben, M. 1991. Pluralization of Hausa nouns, viewed from psycholinguistic experiments and child language data. M. Phil. dissertation, University of Oslo, Norway
- Cruse, D. Alan 1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Atran, Scott. 1990. Cognitive foundations of natural history: towards an anthropology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Pollard, Carl and Ivan A. Sag. 1993. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and Stanford: the Center for the Study of Language and Information
- Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1980. A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. (University of California Publications in Linguistics, 91.) Berkeley: University of California Press
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,002
Event structure, conceptual spaces and the semantics of verbs
Warglien, M., Gärdenfors, P., & Westera, M. (2012) · Theoretical Linguistics · doi:10.1515/tl-2012-0010 · Cited by 75
Herbst, T. (2015) · Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.3844/jssp.2015.91.110 · Cited by 76
The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics
(2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108277327 · Cited by 77
Specialized Knowledge Representation and the Parameterization of Context
Faber, P., & León-Araúz, P. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00196 · Cited by 77
Cuccio, V. (2018) · Metaphor in language, cognition, and communication · doi:10.1075/milcc.7 · Cited by 82
Magnus, M. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585847.013.0010 · Cited by 73
Sommerer, L., & Baumann, A. (2021) · Cognitive Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cog-2020-0013 · Cited by 74
Universals of word order reflect optimization of grammars for efficient communication
Hahn, M., Jurafsky, D., & Futrell, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1910923117 · Cited by 87
(2013) · Natural language processing · doi:10.1075/nlp · Cited by 76
A Toolbox of Methods for Gesture Analysis
Müller, F. M. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108638869.009 · Cited by 73
Hart, C. (2016) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926516630896 · Cited by 72
Desiderata for metaphor theory, the Motivation & Sedimentation Model and motion-emotion metaphoremes
Zlatev, J., Jacobsson, G. S., & Paju, L. (2020) · Figurative thought and language · doi:10.1075/ftl.11.02zla · Cited by 72
The Dynamics of Metaphor: Foregrounding and Activating Metaphoricity in Conversational Interaction
Müller, F. M., & Tag, S. (2010) · Cognitive Semiotics · doi:10.3726/81610_85 · Cited by 72
The iconicity of embodied meaning. Polysemy of spatial prepositions in the cognitive framework
der Gucht, F. V., Willems, K., & Cuypere, L. D. (2007) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.027 · Cited by 71
The Cognitive Foundation of Post-colonial Englishes
Hoffmann, T. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108909730 · Cited by 69
Nørgård‐Sørensen, J., Heltoft, L., & Schøsler, L. (2011) · Studies in functional and structural linguistics, SFSL · doi:10.1075/sfsl.65 · Cited by 69
Gavins, J. (2012) · Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics · doi:10.1177/0963947012444959 · Cited by 68
Slonimska, A., Özyürek, A., & Capirci, O. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104246 · Cited by 67
How Do Children Restrict Their Linguistic Generalizations? An (Un‐)Grammaticality Judgment Study
Ambridge, B. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12018 · Cited by 67
Expressions of futurity in contemporary English: a Construction Grammar perspective
Bergs, A. T. (2010) · English Language and Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s1360674310000067 · Cited by 65
Grammaticalization and linguistic Variation
Poplack, S. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0017 · Cited by 67
Fitzpatrick, T., Playfoot, D. R., Alison Wray, A., & Wright, M. J. (2013) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amt020 · Cited by 66
The Nominative and Infinitive in Late Modern English
Noël, D. (2008) · Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.1177/0075424208321750 · Cited by 65
Lyngfelt, B. (2018) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.22.01lyn · Cited by 64
Editors’ Introduction and Review: Sociolinguistic Variation and Cognitive Science
Chevrot, J., Drager, K., & Foulkes, P. (2018) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12384 · Cited by 64
Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice
Goyens, M., Ducos, J., Vigneron, F., & Fourneau, I. (2013) · Terminology and lexicography research and practice · doi:10.1075/tlrp · Cited by 63
Constructional Approaches to Language
(2013) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal · Cited by 63
The grammaticalization of definite articles
Mulder, W. D., & Carlier, A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0042 · Cited by 62
Action verbs, argument structure constructions, and the mirror neuron system
Kemmerer, D. L. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511541599.011 · Cited by 62
Semantics, conceptual spaces, and the meeting of minds
Warglien, M., & Gärdenfors, P. (2011) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-011-9963-z · Cited by 66
Hodge, G., & Johnston, T. A. (2014) · Australian Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1080/07268602.2014.887408 · Cited by 61
Aspects of the grammar of close apposition and the structure of the noun phrase
Acuña-Fariña, C. (2009) · English Language and Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s1360674309990190 · Cited by 61
Interactional Construction Grammar
Imo, W. (2015) · Linguistics Vanguard · doi:10.1515/lingvan-2015-0008 · Cited by 61
Cross-language priming: A view from bilingual speech
Travis, C. E., Cacoullos, R. T., & Kidd, E. (2015) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728915000127 · Cited by 61
Property Grammars: A Fully Constraint-Based Theory
Blache, P. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11424574_1 · Cited by 59
Semantic profiles of antonymic adjectives in discourse
Paradis, C., Löhndorf, S., van de Weijer, J., & Willners, C. (2014) · Linguistics · doi:10.1515/ling-2014-0035 · Cited by 58
How to do corpus pragmatics on pragmatically annotated data
Weißer, M. (2018) · Studies in corpus linguistics · doi:10.1075/scl.84 · Cited by 58
Feist, M. I. (2008) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/03640210802152335 · Cited by 56
Mittelberg, I. (2018) · Cognitive Semiotics · doi:10.1515/cogsem-2018-0002 · Cited by 56
Building and Interpreting Ad Hoc Categories: A Linguistic Analysis
Mauri, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48832-5_16 · Cited by 56
Cienki, A. J., & Iriskhanova, O. K. (2018) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.62 · Cited by 56
Chapter 2. War, worlds and Cognitive Grammar
Stockwell, P. B. (2014) · Linguistic approaches to literature · doi:10.1075/lal.17.02sto · Cited by 55
A Difference of Some Consequence Between Conventions and Rules
Millikan, R. G. (2008) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-008-9026-3 · Cited by 52
The constructional underpinnings of viewpoint blends
Nikiforidou, K. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139084727.014 · Cited by 53
Conceptual metaphor variation in meaning interpretation
Onysko, A. (2017) · Cognitive Linguistic Studies · doi:10.1075/cogls.4.1.02ony · Cited by 53
Broccias, C. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0061 · Cited by 57
English Comparative Correlatives
Hoffmann, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108569859 · Cited by 60
Tantucci, V. (2015) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2015.26 · Cited by 51
Partial productivity of linguistic constructions: Dynamic categorization and statistical preemption
Goldberg, A. E. (2016) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2016.17 · Cited by 53
Constructional change vs. grammaticalization
Heine, B., Narrog, H., & Long, H. (2016) · Studies in Language · doi:10.1075/sl.40.1.05hei · Cited by 56
Athanasiadou, A. (2017) · Figurative thought and language · doi:10.1075/ftl.1.10ath · Cited by 51
Bauer, M., Knape, J., Koch, P. P., & Winkler, S. (2010) · Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik · doi:10.1007/bf03379835 · Cited by 51
Reflections on the role of pragmatics in Construction Grammar
Finkbeiner, R. (2019) · Constructions and Frames · doi:10.1075/cf.00027.fin · Cited by 51
Auxiliary Selection in Spanish
Rosemeyer, M. (2014) · Studies in language companion series · doi:10.1075/slcs.155 · Cited by 50
From grammaticalization to Diachronic Construction Grammar
Gildea, S., & Barðdal, J. (2022) · Studies in Language · doi:10.1075/sl.20079.gil · Cited by 58
The Role of Logic and Ontology in Language and Reasoning
Sowa, J. F. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8845-1_11 · Cited by 54
Ambridge, B., Barak, L., Wonnacott, E., Bannard, C., & Sala, G. (2018) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.133 · Cited by 52
Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language
Herbst, T. (2020) · Constructions and Frames · doi:10.1075/cf.00035.her · Cited by 50
Metaphoricalparasitesand “parasitic” metaphors
Мусолфф, А. (2014) · Journal of Language and Politics · doi:10.1075/jlp.13.2.02mus · Cited by 50
New Insights into the Semantics of Legal Concepts and the Legal Dictionary
Bajčić, M. (2017) · Terminology and lexicography research and practice · doi:10.1075/tlrp.17 · Cited by 50
Thorne, J. C., Coggins, T. E., Olson, H. C., & Astley, S. J. (2007) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/032 · Cited by 50
Debaisieux, J.-M., & Benzitoun, C. (2020) · Langages · doi:10.3917/lang.219.0005 · Cited by 50
Profiling Discourse Participants: Forms and functions in Spanish conversation and debates
Cock, B. D. (2014) · Digital Access to Libraries · Cited by 49
VIEWPOINT IN LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE
Hart, C. (2015) · Critical Discourse Studies · doi:10.1080/17405904.2015.1013479 · Cited by 49
Conversation, Construction Grammar, and cognition
Fischer, K. (2015) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2015.23 · Cited by 49
Survey on frontiers of language and robotics
Taniguchi, T., Mochihashi, D., Nagai, T., Uchida, S., Inoue, N., Kobayashi, I., Nakamura, T., Hagiwara, Y., Iwahashi, N., & Inamura, T. (2019) · Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1080/01691864.2019.1632223 · Cited by 51
On the Role of Senses in the Ontology-Lexicon
Cimiano, P., McCrae, J. P., Paul Buitelaar, C., & Montiel-Ponsoda, E. (2012) · Theory and applications of natural language processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31782-8_4 · Cited by 48
Kruger, H., & van Rooy, B. (2016) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2016.04.003 · Cited by 36
Herce, B. (2019) · Studies in Language · doi:10.1075/sl.17042.her · Cited by 48
Kecskés, I. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316217832 · Cited by 73
Constructionist approaches to creativity
Hoffmann, T. (2022) · Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association · doi:10.1515/gcla-2022-0012 · Cited by 48
Bogaert, J. V. (2010) · English Language and Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s1360674310000134 · Cited by 50
Polyzou, A. (2014) · Critical Discourse Studies · doi:10.1080/17405904.2014.991796 · Cited by 47
Vernaculars and the Idea of a Standard Language
Linn, A. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585847.013.0016 · Cited by 48
Are similes and metaphors interchangeable?
Romano, M. (2017) · Review of Cognitive Linguistics · doi:10.1075/rcl.15.1.01rom · Cited by 47
Lou, A. (2017) · English Text Construction · doi:10.1075/etc.10.1.06lou · Cited by 47
Typology and Second Language Acquisition
Ramat, A. G. (2012) · The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1233 · Cited by 47
Integrating constructional semantics and conceptual metaphor
Sullivan, K. (2016) · Constructions and Frames · doi:10.1075/cf.8.2.02sul · Cited by 46
Metonymic indeterminacy and metalepsis
Brdar-Szabó, R., & Brdar, M. (2020) · Figurative thought and language · doi:10.1075/ftl.11.06brd · Cited by 46
Multiple inheritance and constructional change
Trousdale, G. (2013) · Studies in Language · doi:10.1075/sl.37.3.02tro · Cited by 46
Sensory Linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor
Winter, B. (2019) · Cited by 47
Metaphor in specialist discourse
Littlemore, J. (2015) · Metaphor in language, cognition, and communication · doi:10.1075/milcc.4.12lit · Cited by 45
Grammaticalisation due to homonymy avoidance In Gudbrandsdalen /æpr˛ede/?1
Enger, H. (2007) · Transactions of the Philological Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-968x.2007.00183.x · Cited by 44
Conceptual Spaces at Work in Sensory Cognition: Domains, Dimensions and Distances
Paradis, C. (2015) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15021-5_3 · Cited by 44
Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies
Ancarno, C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108348195.009 · Cited by 49
Viewpoint and construction grammar: The case of past + now
Nikiforidou, K. (2010) · Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics · doi:10.1177/0963947010370253 · Cited by 43
Rich Language Analysis for Counterterrorism
Guidère, M., Howard, N., & Argamon, S. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01141-2_7 · Cited by 43
Chapter 9. Term and concept variation in specialized knowledge dynamics
León-Araúz, P. (2017) · Terminology and lexicography research and practice · doi:10.1075/tlrp.18.09leo · Cited by 43
Irony in language use and communication
(2017) · Figurative thought and language · doi:10.1075/ftl.1 · Cited by 43
A Construction Grammar Approach to Genre
Hoffman, T., & Bergs, A. T. (2018) · Cognitextes · doi:10.4000/cognitextes.1032 · Cited by 43
Schilperoord, J. (2018) · Converging evidence in language and communication research · doi:10.1075/celcr.18.02sch · Cited by 42
An Elicited‐Production Study of Inflectional Verb Morphology in Child Finnish
RÄSÄNEN, S. H. M., Ambridge, B., & Pine, J. M. (2015) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12305 · Cited by 42
Korecky‐Kröll, K., Libben, G., Stempfer, N., Wiesinger, J., Reinisch, E., Bertl, J., & Dressler, W. U. (2012) · Morphology · doi:10.1007/s11525-011-9191-8 · Cited by 41
New perspectives on language, cognition, and values
Jensen, T. W. (2013) · Journal of Multicultural Discourses · doi:10.1080/17447143.2013.861841 · Cited by 41
The Awareness of Consequences Scale: An Exploration, Empirical Analysis, and Reinterpretation
Ryan, A. M., & Spash, C. L. (2012) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00951.x · Cited by 47
“Bringing FPA Back Home:” Cognition, Constructivism, and Conceptual Metaphor
Flanik, W. M. (2011) · Foreign Policy Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00148.x · Cited by 41
Metaphor in culture: LIFE IS A SHOW in Chinese
Yu, N., & Jia, D. (2016) · Cognitive Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cog-2015-0080 · Cited by 41
Existentials as impersonalising devices: the case of European Portuguese1
Afonso, S. (2008) · Transactions of the Philological Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-968x.2008.00192.x · Cited by 40
Diving into English motion verbs from a lexico-semantic approach
Muñoz, I. D., & L’Homme, M.-C. (2020) · Terminology International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication · doi:10.1075/term.00041.dur · Cited by 40
What would it take for us to abandon Construction Grammar?
Hoffmann, T. (2020) · Belgian Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1075/bjl.00042.hof · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- ORCID
- Croft, William
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2004-01-22
- OpenAlex
- W354650940
- Cited by
- 3,316
- References
- 185
- Citations by year
- 2026: 180 · 2025: 168 · 2024: 226 · 2023: 234 · 2022: 225 · 2021: 294 · 2020: 330 · 2019: 309 · 2018: 181 · 2017: 159 · 2016: 109 · 2015: 189 · 2014: 277 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 73
- FWCI
- 17.84
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Keywords
- cognitive linguistics, language and cognition, linguistic representation, word meaning, syntactic representation, cognitive grammar, construction grammar, language processing in the brain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review