Cited by 3,316Language, Metaphor, and CognitionCategorization, perception, and languageSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 170 of the 185 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive Linguistics

Croft, William, Cruse, D. Alan·2004·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

Cognitive Linguistics argues that language is governed by general cognitive principles, rather than by a special-purpose language module. This introductory textbook surveys the field of cognitive linguistics as a distinct area of study, presenting its theoretical foundations and the arguments supporting it. Clearly organised and accessibly written, it provides a useful introduction to the relationship between language and cognitive processing in the human brain. It covers the main topics likely to be encountered in a course or seminar, and provides a synthesis of study and research in this fast-growing field of linguistics. The authors begin by explaining the conceptual structures and cognitive processes governing linguistic representation and behaviour, and go on to explore cognitive approaches to lexical semantics, as well as syntactic representation and analysis, focusing on the closely related frameworks of cognitive grammar and construction grammar. This much-needed introduction will be welcomed by students in linguistics and cognitive science.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511803864

Cites

170 of 170 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 185 references

Research works printed but not linked: 85

  1. Zager, David. 1980. A real-time process model of morphological change. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York
  2. Poplack, Shana. 1996. The sociolinguistic dynamics of apparent convergence. Towards a social science of language: papers in honor of William Labov, vol. 1: variation and change in language and society, ed. Gregory Guy, John Baugh and Deborah Schiffrin, 295–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  3. Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  4. Togia, Pagona. 1996. Antonyms in English and Modern Greek: a cognitive approach. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, University of Manchester
  5. Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum and Ivan Sag. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
  6. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1980. Culture and value, trans. P. Winch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  7. Wilson, Deirdre. 1975. Presuppositions and non-truth-conditional semantics. New York: Academic Press
  8. Janda, Richard D. 1990. Frequency, markedness and morphological change: on predicting the spread of noun-plural -s in Modern High German and West Germanic. Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL '90), 136–53. Columbus: The Ohio State University
  9. Hampton, James. 1997. Psychological representation of concepts. Cognitive models of memory, ed. Martin A. Conway, 81–107. Hove: Psychology Press
  10. Quine, Willard van Orman. 1951 [1961]. Two dogmas of empiricism. From a logical point of view (2nd ed.), 20–46. New York: Harper. (Originally published in Philosophical Review 60:20–43, 1951.)
  11. Perlmutter, David M. (ed.). 1983. Studies in relational grammar 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  12. Matthews, Peter H. 1981. Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  13. Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
  14. Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
  15. Lakoff, George and Eve Sweetser. 1994. Foreword to Gilles Fauconnier, Mental Spaces, ix–xlvi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  16. Heidegger, Martin. 1927 [1962]. Being and time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper and Row. (Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Neomarius Verlag.)
  17. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1989. Truth and method, trans. William Glen-Doepel, ed. John Cumming and Garrett Barden, translation rev. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. London: Sheed & Ward
  18. Cruse, 1994, Prototype theory and lexical relations, Rivista di Linguistica, 6, 167
  19. Fillmore, 1986a, «U»-semantics, second round, Quaderni di semantica, 7, 49
  20. Sadock, Jerrold M. and Arnold Zwicky. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1: clause structure, ed. Timothy Shopen, 155–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  21. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1988. The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins · DOI
  22. Fauconnier, 1986, Quantification, roles, and domains, Versus, 44/45, 61
  23. Bolinger, 1992, About furniture and birds, Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 111
  24. 10.1207/s15516709cog2103_1 · DOI
  25. Taylor, John R. 2002. Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  26. Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  27. Langacker, Ronald W. 1991a. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: descriptive application. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
  28. Aronoff, Mark. 1993. Morphology by itself: items and inflectional classes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
  29. Cruse, 2002a, Microsenses, default specificity and the semantics-pragmatics boundary, Axiomathes, 1, 1
  30. Cruse, D. Alan 1990. Prototype theory and lexical semantics. Meanings and prototypes: studies in linguistic categorization, ed. Savas L. Tzohatzidis, 382–402. London: Routledge
  31. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. The view from Building 20, ed. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
  32. Fillmore, Charles J. 1975. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. Cathy Cogen et al., 123–31. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society
  33. Labov, William. 1973. The boundaries of words and their meanings. New ways of analyzing variation in English, ed. Joshua Fishman, 340–73. Washington D. C.: Georgetown University Press
  34. Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
  35. Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness and time: the flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  36. Barlow, Michael and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information
  37. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
  38. Tsukiashi, Ayumi. 1997. A usage-based analysis of the Japanese passive construction. M.A. dissertation, University of Manchester
  39. Bresnan, Joan (ed.). 1982. The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
  40. Hudson, Richard. 1984. Word grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
  41. Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: the cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  42. Clahsen, 1992, Inflectional rules in children's grammar: evidence from the development of participles in German, Yearbook of Morphology, 1992, 1
  43. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
  44. Langacker, 1976, Semantic representations and the linguistic relativity hypothesis, Foundations of Language, 14, 307
  45. Chafe, Wallace (ed.). 1980. The pear stories. New York: Ablex
  46. Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. The new psychology of language, vol. 2, ed. Michael Tomasello, 211–42. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  47. Bolinger, Dwight. 1971. The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
  48. Turner, Mark. 1987. Death is the mother of beauty: mind, metaphor, criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  49. Berlin, Brent and Paul Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press
  50. Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
  51. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  52. 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun phrase antecedents. New York: Routledge
  54. Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional syntax: anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  55. Croft, William. 2003b. In preparation. Verbs: aspect and argument structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  56. Talmy, Leonard. 1972. Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley
  57. Taylor, John R. 1989 [1997]. Linguistic categorization: prototypes in linguistic theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press
  58. Fauconnier, Gilles and Eve Sweetser (ed.). 1996. Spaces, worlds and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  59. Wood, Mary McGee. 1993. Categorial grammars. London: Routledge
  60. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 1994. The poetics of mind: figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  61. Jespersen, Otto. 1942. A modern English grammar on historical principles, vol. 6. London: Allen & Unwin
  62. McCawley, James D. 1981 [1993]. Everything that linguists have always wanted to know about logic (but were ashamed to ask) (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  63. Turner, 1990, Aspects of the invariance hypothesis, Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 247
  64. Hawkinson, 1974, Natural hierarchies of topic in Shona, Studies in African Linguistics, 5, 147
  65. Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985 [1994]. Mental Spaces (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  66. Larsen, Thomas W. and William M. Norman. 1979. Correlates of ergativity in Mayan grammar. Ergativity, ed. Frans Plank, 347–69. New York: Academic Press
  67. Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1991. Being-in-the-world: a commentary of Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
  68. Hayes, Victoria. 2001. A comparative analysis of antonymy and hybrid anto-complementarity in English and German within a cognitive framework. Ph. D. thesis, University of Manchester
  69. Herskovits, Annette. 1986. Language and spatial cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  70. Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. Introduction to government and binding theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell
  71. Kant, Immanuel. 1790 [1952]. The critique of judgement, trans. J. C. Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Kritik der Urteilskraft. Berlin: Bey Lagarde und Friederich.)
  72. Cruse, 1995, Towards a cognitive model of antonymy, Lexicology, 1, 113
  73. Lyons, John. 1963. Structural semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  74. Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  75. Daugherty, K. and Mark Seidenberg. 1992. Rules or connections? The past tense revisited. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 259–64. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum
  76. Husserl, Edmund. 1948 [1973]. Experience and judgement, trans. James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press. (Erfahrung und Urteil, ed. Ludwig Landgrebe. Hamburg: Claassen & Goverts.)
  77. Lakoff, George. 1996. Moral politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  78. Ricoeur, Paul. 1978. The metaphorical process as cognition, imagination and feeling. On metaphor, ed. Sheldon Sacks, 141–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  79. Cruse, D. Alan., Franz Hundsnurscher, Michael Job and Peter Lutzeier (eds.). 2002. Lexicology: an international handbook on the nature and structure of words and vocabularies. (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, 21.1.) Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
  80. Lobben, M. 1991. Pluralization of Hausa nouns, viewed from psycholinguistic experiments and child language data. M. Phil. dissertation, University of Oslo, Norway
  81. Cruse, D. Alan 1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  82. Atran, Scott. 1990. Cognitive foundations of natural history: towards an anthropology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  83. Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
  84. Pollard, Carl and Ivan A. Sag. 1993. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and Stanford: the Center for the Study of Language and Information
  85. Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1980. A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. (University of California Publications in Linguistics, 91.) Berkeley: University of California Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,002

Metadata

Authors
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2004-01-22
OpenAlex
W354650940
Cited by
3,316
References
185
Citations by year
2026: 180 · 2025: 168 · 2024: 226 · 2023: 234 · 2022: 225 · 2021: 294 · 2020: 330 · 2019: 309 · 2018: 181 · 2017: 159 · 2016: 109 · 2015: 189 · 2014: 277 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 73
FWCI
17.84
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Keywords
cognitive linguistics, language and cognition, linguistic representation, word meaning, syntactic representation, cognitive grammar, construction grammar, language processing in the brain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review