Strangers at the Gates: Movements and States in Contentious Politics
Abstract
This book contains the products of work carried out over four decades of research in Italy, France and the United States, and in the intellectual territory between social movements, comparative politics, and historical sociology. Using a variety of methods ranging from statistical analysis to historical case studies to linguistic analysis, the book centers on historical catalogs of protest events and cycles of collective action. Sidney Tarrow places social movements in the broader arena of contentious politics, in relation to states, political parties and other actors. From peasants and communists in 1960s Italy, to movements and politics in contemporary western polities, to the global justice movement in the new century, the book argues that contentious actors are neither outside of nor completely within politics, but rather they occupy the uncertain territory between total opposition and integration into policy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Processes like the fall of the Bastille in particular, and revolutions in general, illuminate the ways in which moments of temporal heterogeneity morph into common fields of 'ruptural unity' as social facts are disrupted and transformed.
“Processes like the fall of the Bastille in particular, and revolutions in general, illuminate the ways in which moments of temporal heterogeneity morph into common fields of 'ruptural unity' as social facts are disrupted and transformed (Steinmetz 2011; also see Tarrow 2012: 124).”
From Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory (2016) · cites this paper as Tarrow 2012
Cites
Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation
Sewell Jr., W. H. (2005) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226749198.001.0001 · Cited by 1,410 · see citing works
Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency
McAdam, D. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095322 · Cited by 1,016 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory
Lawson, G. (2016) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275116649221 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tarrow, S.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tarrow, Sidney
- ORCID
- Tarrow, Sidney
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2012-03-26
- OpenAlex
- W4255578244
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Communism, Protests, Social Movements
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
- Keywords
- social movements, contentious politics, protest events, collective action, political integration, state-society relations, political parties, peasants, communists, alter-globalization, Italy, France, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review