Cited by 177Communism, Protests, Social MovementsPolitical Conflict and GovernanceSocial Movements and Cultural Identity

Strangers at the Gates: Movements and States in Contentious Politics

Tarrow, Sidney·2012·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

This book contains the products of work carried out over four decades of research in Italy, France and the United States, and in the intellectual territory between social movements, comparative politics, and historical sociology. Using a variety of methods ranging from statistical analysis to historical case studies to linguistic analysis, the book centers on historical catalogs of protest events and cycles of collective action. Sidney Tarrow places social movements in the broader arena of contentious politics, in relation to states, political parties and other actors. From peasants and communists in 1960s Italy, to movements and politics in contemporary western polities, to the global justice movement in the new century, the book argues that contentious actors are neither outside of nor completely within politics, but rather they occupy the uncertain territory between total opposition and integration into policy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511920967

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Processes like the fall of the Bastille in particular, and revolutions in general, illuminate the ways in which moments of temporal heterogeneity morph into common fields of 'ruptural unity' as social facts are disrupted and transformed.

    “Processes like the fall of the Bastille in particular, and revolutions in general, illuminate the ways in which moments of temporal heterogeneity morph into common fields of 'ruptural unity' as social facts are disrupted and transformed (Steinmetz 2011; also see Tarrow 2012: 124).”

    From Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory (2016) · cites this paper as Tarrow 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tarrow, S.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Tarrow, Sidney
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2012-03-26
OpenAlex
W4255578244
Cited by
177
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5
FWCI
6.59
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Communism, Protests, Social Movements
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
Keywords
social movements, contentious politics, protest events, collective action, political integration, state-society relations, political parties, peasants, communists, alter-globalization, Italy, France, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review