Cited by 1,016Race, History, and American SocietySocial Movements and Cultural IdentityPolitical Conflict and Governance

Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency

McAdam, Doug·1983·American Sociological Review

Abstract

The pace of black insurgency between 1955 and 1970 is analyzed as a function of an ongoing process of tactical interaction between movement forces and southern segregationists. Given a political system vulnerable to challenge and strong internal organization the main challenge confronting insurgents is a preeminently tactical one. Lacking institutionalized power, challengers must devise protest techniques that offset their powerlessness. This is referred to as a process of tactical innovation. Such innovations, however, only temporarily afford challengers increased bargaining leverage. In chess-like fashion, movement opponents can be expected, through effective tactical adaptation, to neutralize the new tactic, thereby reinstituting the power disparity between themselves and the challenger. This perspective is applied to the development of the black movement over the period, 1955-1970. Evidence derived from content-coding all relevant story synopses contained in The New York Times Index for these years is presented showing a strong correspondence between the introduction of new protest techniques and peaks in movement activity. Conversely, lulls in black insurgency reflect the successful efforts of movement opponents to devise effective tactical counters to these innovations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2095322

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence that the Sudanese security apparatus began to adapt its repressive response in light of dissidents' usage of parallel protests, in-line with ideas conceptualized by McAdam (1983).

    “There is evidence that the Sudanese security apparatus began to adapt its repressive response in light of dissidents' usage of parallel protests, in-line with ideas conceptualized by McAdam (1983).”

    From Coordinated Dis-Coordination (2024) · cites this paper as McAdam (1983)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McAdam, D.
Corresponding author
McAdam, Doug
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1983-12
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
735
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067656744
Cited by
1,016
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 27
FWCI
17.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
Black Power, tactical innovation, segregationism, civil rights movement, bargaining power, racial politics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review