Cited by 1,410Philosophy, History, and HistoriographyPhilosophy and Historical ThoughtEducator Training and Historical Pedagogy

Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation

Sewell Jr., William H.·2005·University of Chicago Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7208/chicago/9780226749198.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chains of events have cascading effects in that they both break and reproduce existing social formations.

    “These chains of events have cascading effects in that they both break and reproduce existing social formations - they are 'sequences of occurrences that result in the transformation of structures' (Sewell 2005: 227; also see: Mahoney and Schensul 2006).”

    From Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory (2016) · cites this paper as Sewell 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sewell Jr., W. H.
Venue
University of Chicago Press eBooks
Published
2005
OpenAlex
W4235763390
Cited by
1,410
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 116 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 139 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 38
FWCI
95.24
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Keywords
historical reasoning, philosophy of history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review