The Interpersonal Dynamics of Emotion: Toward an Integrative Theory of Emotions as Social Information
Abstract
Emotions are an elemental part of life - they imbue our existence with meaning and purpose, and influence how we engage with the world around us. But we do not just feel our own emotions; we typically express them in the presence of other people. How do our emotional expressions affect others? Moving beyond the traditional intrapersonal perspective, this is the first book dedicated to exploring the pervasive interpersonal dynamics of emotions. Integrating existing theory and research, van Kleef develops the Emotions as Social Information (EASI) theory, a groundbreaking comprehensive framework that explains how emotional expressions influence observers across all domains of life, from close relationships to group settings, conflict and negotiation, customer service, and leader-follower relations. His deeply social perspective sheds new light on the fundamental question of why we have emotions in the first place - the social influence emotions engender may very well constitute their raison d'être.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EASI theory postulates that emotional expressions disambiguate social situations and facilitate interpersonal coordination.
“EASI theory postulates that emotional expressions disambiguate social situations and facilitate interpersonal coordination.”
From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2016
Observers distill relevant information from other people's emotional expressions, whether about internally experienced emotions, social motives, or both.
“observers distill relevant information from other people's emotional expressions-be it about their internally experienced emotions, their social motives, or some combination of the two”
From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2016
Emotional expressions can evoke sentiments in observers, such as liking and feelings of closeness to the expresser.
“Emotional expressions can also evoke sentiments in observers, such as liking and feelings of closeness to the expresser”
From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2016
Emotional expressions influence observers' behaviors through affective reactions and inferential processes, with the potency of each mechanism depending on observers' information processing and the perceived appropriateness of the expressions.
“Finally, our review supports key propositions of EASI theory (Van Kleef 2016) suggesting that emotional expressions influence observers' behaviors through affective reactions and inferential processes, with the potency of each mechanism depending on observers' information processing and the perceived appropriateness of the expressions.”
From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2016
The social effects of emotions are functionally equivalent across expressive modalities.
“All in all, the current evidence suggests that the social effects of emotions are functionally equivalent across expressive modalities (Van Kleef 2016).”
From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2016
Effects of emotional expressions are stronger to the degree that senders are more emotionally expressive and receivers have greater emotion perception ability.
“effects are stronger to the degree that senders are more emotionally expressive and receivers have greater emotion perception ability”
From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2016
The relative impact of affective reactions on behavior increases when observers are less motivated and able to engage in thorough information processing and/or perceive the emotional expression as inappropriate.
“the relative impact of affective reactions increases when observers are less motivated and able to engage in thorough information processing and/or perceive the emotional expression as inappropriate”
From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2016
The relative impact of inferential processes on behavior increases when observers are more motivated and able to engage in thorough information processing and deem the emotional expression appropriate.
“The relative impact of inferential processes on behavior increases when observers are more motivated and able to engage in thorough information processing and deem the emotional expression appropriate in light of the situation.”
From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2016
Violations of norms and expectations regarding emotional expression can be qualitative (showing the wrong emotion) or quantitative (showing the right emotion with the wrong intensity).
“Violations of such norms and expectations can be qualitative (i.e., showing the wrong emotion) or quantitative (i.e., showing the right emotion with the wrong intensity) (Van Kleef 2016).”
From The Social Effects of Emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Van Kleef 2016
Cites
SERVICE WITH A SMILE: EMOTIONAL CONTAGION IN THE SERVICE ENCOUNTER.
Pugh, S. D. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069445 · Cited by 1,393 · see citing works
Maternal emotional signaling: Its effect on the visual cliff behavior of 1-year-olds.
Sorce, J. F., Emde, R. N., Campos, J. J., & Klinnert, M. D. (1985) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.21.1.195 · Cited by 885 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The visual cliff usually consists of a glasscovered table that is divided into two halves: a shallow side under which a patterned surface is placed immediately beneath the glass plate, and a deep side under which a similar surface is visible at some distance below the glass (Sorce et al., 1985).”
BackgroundHeerdink, M. W., van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., & Fischer, A. H. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.004 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Social Effects of Emotions
van Kleef, G. A., & Côté, S. (2022) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-010855 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, L., Restubog, S., Shao, B., Lu, V., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0460 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Leadership and affect: moving the hearts and minds of followers
van Knippenberg, D., & van Kleef, G. A. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1160515 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationvan Kleef, G. A., Cheshin, A., Koning, L. F., & Wolf, S. A. (2019) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.004 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Emotional influence in groups: the dynamic nexus of affect, cognition, and behavior
van Kleef, G. A., Heerdink, M. W., & Homan, A. C. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.017 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationAnderson, C. L., Monroy, M., & Keltner, D. (2018) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000378 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Hong, D., & Kim, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1265581 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- van Kleef, G. A.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2016-03-31
- OpenAlex
- W2783490104
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 27.66
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- emotions, emotional expression, interpersonal dynamics, emotion perception, close relationships, group settings, conflict and negotiation, customer service, leader-follower relationships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review