Cited by 49Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformanceEmotions and Moral Behavior

Emotional influence in groups: the dynamic nexus of affect, cognition, and behavior

Open access
van Kleef, Gerben A, Heerdink, Marc W, Homan, Astrid C·2017·Current Opinion in Psychology

Abstract

Groups are a natural breeding ground for emotions. Group life affords unique opportunities but also poses critical challenges that may arouse emotional reactions in group members. Social-functional approaches hold that these emotions in turn contribute to group functioning by prompting group members to address concerns that are relevant to the group's success. Guided by Emotions as Social Information (EASI) theory, this paper reviews research on the affective, cognitive, and behavioral consequences of emotional expressions in groups. Affective processes include emotional contagion and affective convergence, and resulting states such as group affective tone and affective diversity. Cognitive processes include inferences group members draw from each other's emotional expressions. We discuss how these affective and cognitive processes shape behavior and group functioning. We conclude that the traditional (over)emphasis on affective processes must be complemented with a focus on cognitive processes to develop a more complete understanding of the social dynamics of emotions in groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.017

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological studies show that in humans sharing of affect across group members, achieved through emotional contagion, improves intra-group communication and facilitates group bonding.

    “Psychological studies show that in humans sharing of affect across group members, which is achieved through emotional contagion, improves intra-group communication and facilitates group bonding.176,177”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Kleef, G. A., Heerdink, M. W., & Homan, A. C.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
17
Pages
156-161
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2738646651
Cited by
49
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
collective emotions, emotional contagion, emotional expression, group functioning
MeSH terms
Cognition, Emotions, Group Processes, Humans, Models, Psychological, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review