Cited by 611Religious Studies and Spiritual PracticesHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical StudiesStudy and Philosophy of Religion

Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture

Hanegraaff, Wouter J.·2012·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

Academics tend to look on 'esoteric', 'occult' or 'magical' beliefs with contempt, but are usually ignorant about the religious and philosophical traditions to which these terms refer, or their relevance to intellectual history. Wouter Hanegraaff tells the neglected story of how intellectuals since the Renaissance have tried to come to terms with a cluster of 'pagan' ideas from late antiquity that challenged the foundations of biblical religion and Greek rationality. Expelled from the academy on the basis of Protestant and Enlightenment polemics, these traditions have come to be perceived as the Other by which academics define their identity to the present day. Hanegraaff grounds his discussion in a meticulous study of primary and secondary sources, taking the reader on an exciting intellectual voyage from the fifteenth century to the present day and asking what implications the forgotten history of exclusion has for established textbook narratives of religion, philosophy and science.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139048064

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study of Western esotericism charts the complex reception-history and related developments, from the Renaissance through today, regarding the sources Dillon refers to as the Platonic Underworld.

    “One could argue that the study of “Western esotericism” simply charts the complex reception-history and related developments, from the Renaissance through today, regarding the sources that Dillon refers to as “some loose ends” in the study of Middle Platonism: the aforementioned “Platonic Underworld””

    From New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism (2021) · cites this paper as Hanegraaff, 2012

  • Hanegraaff is correct that narratives identifying ultimate wisdom as both primordial and derived of some eastern or barbarian provenance are central to both the notions of the Platonic Underworld and the greater relationship of esotericism to antiquity.

    “Hanegraaff is of course correct that narratives which identify ultimate wisdom as being both primordial and derived of some “eastern” (or better, “barbarian”-see below) provenance are central to both the notions of the “Platonic Underworld” and the greater relationship of esotericism to antiquity.”

    From New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism (2021) · cites this paper as Hanegraaff, 2012

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanegraaff, W. J.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Hanegraaff, Wouter J.
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2012-01-19
OpenAlex
W4235179627
Cited by
354
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
18.87
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
esotericism, occultism, magic, pagan traditions, late antiquity, intellectual history, Protestant polemics, Enlightenment, biblical religion, religious otherness, history of religions, history of philosophy, history of science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review