CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 187Judicial and Constitutional StudiesPolitical Conflict and GovernanceLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A Study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine

Popova, Maria·2012·Cambridge University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1017/cbo9781139055345
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Why are independent courts rarely found in emerging democracies? This book moves beyond familiar obstacles, such as an inhospitable legal legacy and formal institutions that expose judges to political pressure. It proposes a strategic pressure theory, which claims that in emerging democracies, political competition eggs on rather than restrains power-hungry politicians. Incumbents who are losing their grip on power try to use the courts to hang on, which leads to the politicization of justice. The analysis uses four original datasets, containing 1,000 decisions by Russian and Ukrainian lower courts from 1998 to 2004. The main finding is that justice is politicized in both countries, but in the more competitive regime (Ukraine) incumbents leaned more forcefully on the courts and obtained more favorable rulings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139055345

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 187

Related

Metadata

Authors
Popova, M.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Popova, Maria
ORCID
Popova, Maria
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
2012-01-31
DOI
10.1017/cbo9781139055345
OpenAlex
W3162892875
Cited by
136
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
15.69
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 34 d)
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Keywords
politicization of the judiciary, independent courts, new democracies, political competition, judicial independence, lower courts, Russian court, Ukrainian courts, judicial decisions, political regimes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review