Cited by 20Employer Branding and e-HRMHigher Education and EmployabilityHuman Resource and Talent Management

Employer branding and career theory: new directions for research

Martin, Graeme, Cerdin, Jean-luc·2014·Strategic Talent Management

Abstract

Introduction In this chapter, our aim is to combine insights from employer branding and career management to explain some of the issues facing the talent- and reputation-management agendas in organizations. More specifically, our objectives are: to propose a revised model of employer branding and its links to talent management and organizational reputations, which are key elements in effective career management to analyze links between employer branding and career management to reflect on some of the problems raised by the interdisciplinary nature of employer branding in practice and the consequent implications for careers. Previous research into employer branding and organizational reputations by one of the authors (e.g., Martin and Beaumont, 2003; Martin and Hetrick, 2009; Martin, Gollan, and Grigg, 2011) has led us to accept a working definition of an employer brand as: a generalised recognition for being known among key stakeholders for providing a high quality employment experience, and a distinctive organizational identity which employees value, engage with and feel confident and happy to promote to others. (Martin, Gollan, and Grigg, 2011)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139424585.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Technologies have altered HRM organisational communications, introduced social robots to HRM practices, and enabled new means of employer branding.

    “altered the HRM organisational communications (Kiesler, Siegel, & McGuire, 1984), introduced social robots to the HRM practices (Breazeal, 2002), and enabled new means of employer branding (Martin & Cerdin, 2014).”

    From Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research (2016) · cites this paper as Martin & Cerdin, 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, G., & Cerdin, J.-L.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales (FR)
Venue
Strategic Talent Management
Published
2014-07-03
Pages
151-176
OpenAlex
W243830906
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
20.78
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
employer branding, career management, career theory, talent management, organizational reputation, organizational identity, work experience, stakeholder identification, employee engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review