Cited by 21Mental Health and PsychiatryEmpathy and Medical EducationEducational Philosophies and Pedagogies

Empathy and Alterity in Psychiatry

Kirmayer, Laurence J.·2015·Re-Visioning Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139424745.009

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding a patient's illness narrative depends on situating it in social and cultural context, and this may be particularly challenging when patient and clinician come from different backgrounds.

    “Understanding this narrative depends on situating it in social and cultural context, and this may be particularly challenging when patient and clinician come from different backgrounds (1).”

    From Update on the Cultural Formulation Interview (2020) · cites this paper as [1]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirmayer, L. J.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Kirmayer, Laurence J.
Venue
Re-Visioning Psychiatry
Published
2015-05-31
Pages
141-167
OpenAlex
W2484905425
Cited by
21
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.04
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Funders
Society for Psychological Anthropology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
Keywords
empathy, otherness, psychiatry, therapeutic relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review