Cited by 1,231Action Observation and SynchronizationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning Development

The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise

Zaki, Jamil, Ochsner, Kevin N·2012·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The last decade has witnessed enormous growth in the neuroscience of empathy. Here, we survey research in this domain with an eye toward evaluating its strengths and weaknesses. First, we take stock of the notable progress made by early research in characterizing the neural systems supporting two empathic sub-processes: sharing others' internal states and explicitly considering those states. Second, we describe methodological and conceptual pitfalls into which this work has sometimes fallen, which can limit its validity. These include the use of relatively artificial stimuli that differ qualitatively from the social cues people typically encounter and a lack of focus on the relationship between brain activity and social behavior. Finally, we describe current research trends that are overcoming these pitfalls through simple but important adjustments in focus, and the future promise of empathy research if these trends continue and expand.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3085

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dmPFC is implicated in social cognition, mentalizing, monitoring emotional states, and emotion regulation.

    “The dmPFC, implicated in social cognition (Bzdok et al., 2013; Lieberman, Straccia, Meyer, Du, & Tan, 2019), mentalizing (Zaki & Ochsner, 2012), and monitoring one’s own and others’ emotional states (Ochsner et al., 2012), is thought to play a role in emotion regulation (Buhle et al., 2014; Ochsner & Gross, 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. N.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zaki, Jamil
  • Ochsner, Kevin N
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2012-04-15
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
675-680
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1995296289
Cited by
1,231
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 141 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 12
FWCI
87.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2013-11-22)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA022541)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
empathy, theory of mind, methodological pitfalls, artificial stimuli, brain-behavior relationship, social cognition
MeSH terms
Brain, Emotions, Empathy, Humans, Models, Biological, Neurosciences, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review