The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of Data-driven Learning
Abstract
In this chapter I shall describe and illustrate on-going work that attempts to synthesise two approaches to language teaching – one basically traditional, and the other more innovative. The setting for the work is the insession programme of classes offered by the English for Overseas Students Unit at the University of Birmingham to overseas postgraduate students following courses and undertaking research in a wide range of subjects, from Production Engineering to Special Education and from Accountancy to Theology. Students who need help and encouragement can choose from a programme of classes, some of which are defined in terms of language form (e.g., Remedial Grammar, Pronunciation) and others in terms of language function (e.g., Academic Writing, Social Interaction). The form/function distinction is, however, not adhered to rigidly, and in all classes it is the form/function relationship that is the ultimate object of study in terms of the rules that determine the interpretation of form and those that govern the realisation of function. Two examples may help to demonstrate the implications of Figure 1: 1. In the functionally defined academic writing class we emphasise the importance of indicating to the reader the extent to which the writer allies himself/herself with previous writers on the same topic, and in that context we look at the formal devices (e.g., syntactic choice of tense and lexical choice of reporting verb) by which that functional choice is realised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta‐Analysis
Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12224 · Cited by 580
ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing
Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A. (2004) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.06.002 · Cited by 386
Data‐Driven Learning: Taking the Computer Out of the Equation
Boulton, A. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00566.x · Cited by 278
The Effects of Corpus Use on Second Language Vocabulary Learning: A Multilevel Meta-analysis
Lee, H., Warschauer, M., & Lee, J. H. (2019) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amy012 · Cited by 256
Developing a corpus-based paraphrase tool to improve EFL learners' writing skills
Chen, M.-H., Huang, S.-T., Chang, J. S., & Liou, H.-C. (2015) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2013.783873 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Johns, T.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1994-03-25
- Pages
- 293-313
- OpenAlex
- W1780802623
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.83
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of Data-driven Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139524605.014
- The paper
- Johns, T. (1994). From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of Data-driven Learning. Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524605.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.