The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta‐Analysis
Open accessAbstract
This study applied systematic meta‐analytic procedures to summarize findings from experimental and quasi‐experimental investigations into the effectiveness of using the tools and techniques of corpus linguistics for second language learning or use, here referred to as data‐driven learning (DDL). Analysis of 64 separate studies representing 88 unique samples reporting sufficient data indicated that DDL approaches result in large overall effects for both control/experimental group comparisons (d = 0.95) and for pre/posttest designs (d = 1.50). Further investigation of moderator variables revealed that small effect sizes were generally tied to small sample sizes. Research has barely begun in some key areas, and durability/transfer of learning through delayed posttesting remains an area in need of further investigation. Although DDL research demonstrably improved over the period investigated, further changes in practice and reporting are recommended. Open Practices: This article has been awarded Open Materials and Open Data badges. All materials and data are publicly accessible via the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/jkktw. Learn more about the Open Practices badges from the Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · cited 1×
“Nonetheless, publication bias is still likely insofar as studies which do not produce significant differences or other desired outcomes are more likely to remain unpublished altogether (N. Ellis, 2006), the famous file-drawer problem (Rosenthal, 1979).”
BackgroundDistribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators
Hedges, L. V. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164588 · Cited by 5,695
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4 · Cited by 5,531
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435 · cited 1×
“DDL also provides access to the massive amounts of authentic language needed (input flood) but, crucially, it organizes it to make patterns salient, as is necessary for noticing (Schmidt, 1990).”
BackgroundVisible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta‐analyses relating to achievement
Carter, M. (2009) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410903415150 · Cited by 4,581
Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1385 · Cited by 4,458
Sweller, J. (2012) · Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_446 · Cited by 4,405
Cited by
Technology and the future of language teaching
Kessler, G. (2018) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12318 · Cited by 529
Elgort, I. (2018) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.34554 · Cited by 37
Bennett, C., & Dhonnchadha, E. U. (2023) · Applied Corpus Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100048 · Cited by 19
Integrating AI technology into corpus-based language learning through ChatAI
Anthony, L. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2589747 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Boulton, A., & Cobb, T.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-15
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 348-393
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2587922133
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 72.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta‐Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/lang.12224
- The paper
- Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta‐Analysis. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.