Cited by 138Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationGlobalization and political ideologiesAnthropological Studies and Insights

Neoliberal Multiculturalism?

Kymlicka, Will·2013·Social Resilience in the Neo-Liberal Era

Abstract

The era of neoliberalism is often defined as a set of changes in economic policy and in economic relationships, many of which created new challenges and insecurities for individuals. But it also reshaped the structure of social relationships, including relationships in the family, workplace, neighborhood, and civil society. It may even have reshaped people's subjectivities – their sense of self, their sense of agency, and their identities and solidarities (Brown 2003). According to its most severe critics, the cumulative impact of these changes is a radical atomization of society. In the name of emancipating the autonomous individual, neoliberalism has eroded the social bonds and solidarities upon which individuals depended, leaving people to fend for themselves as “companies of one” in an increasingly insecure world (Lane 2011). Yet the modern world is hardly devoid of social bonds and collective identities. Wherever neoliberal reforms have been implemented, they have operated within a dense field of social relationships that conditions the impact of neoliberalism. If neoliberalism has shaped social relations, it is equally true that those relations have shaped neoliberalism, blocking some neoliberal reforms entirely while pushing other reforms in unexpected directions, with unintended results. In the process, we can see social resilience at work as people contest, contain, subvert, or appropriate neoliberal ideas and policies to protect the social bonds and identities they value.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139542425.007

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiculturalism arose in the 1960s, well before the era of neoliberalism, and was rooted in a social democratic impulse, defended as a natural extension of civil rights struggles and citizenship struggles.

    “Multiculturalism arose in the 1960s, well before the era of neoliberalism, and was rooted in a social democratic impulse, defended as a natural extension of civil rights struggles and citizenship struggles.”
  • The story that multiculturalism emerged as a technique of neoliberal governance is demonstrably wrong as an account of the genealogy of multiculturalism.

    “I have elsewhere argued that this story is demonstrably wrong as an account of the genealogy of multiculturalism (Kymlicka, 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kymlicka, W.
Corresponding author
Kymlicka, Will
Venue
Social Resilience in the Neo-Liberal Era
Published
2013-05-05
Pages
99-126
OpenAlex
W1569710134
Cited by
138
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
35.78
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
Keywords
neoliberalism, multiculturalism, social bonds, collective identity, social resilience, atomization, interpersonal relationships, subjectivity, identity politics, civil society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review