The DOI matches its Crossref record.
States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China
Abstract
State structures, international forces, and class relations: Theda Skocpol shows how all three combine to explain the origins and accomplishments of social-revolutionary transformations. Social revolutions have been rare but undeniably of enormous importance in modern world history. States and Social Revolutions provides a new frame of reference for analyzing the causes, the conflicts, and the outcomes of such revolutions. It develops a rigorous, comparative historical analysis of three major cases: the French Revolution of 1787 through the early 1800s, the Russian Revolution of 1917 through the 1930s, and the Chinese Revolution of 1911 through the 1960s. Believing that existing theories of revolution, both Marxist and non-Marxist, are inadequate to explain the actual historical patterns of revolutions, Skocpol urges us to adopt fresh perspectives. Above all, she maintains that states conceived as administrative and coercive organizations potentially autonomous from class controls and interests must be made central to explanations of revolutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms and results
Mann, M. (1984) · European Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1017/s0003975600004239 · Cited by 2,736
Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador
Wood, E. J. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808685 · Cited by 1,644
Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference
Levy, J. S. (2008) · Conflict Management and Peace Science · doi:10.1080/07388940701860318 · Cited by 1,050
Who Fights? The Determinants of Participation in Civil War
Humphreys, M., & Weinstein, J. M. (2008) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00322.x · Cited by 760
Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science
Fearon, J. D. (1991) · World Politics · doi:10.2307/2010470 · Cited by 729
Metadata
- Authors
- Skocpol, T.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2015-09-29
- OpenAlex
- W166705791
- Cited by
- 1,177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 117.25
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781316423998
- The paper
- Skocpol, T. (2015). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316423998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.