Who Fights? The Determinants of Participation in Civil War
Abstract
A range of seemingly rival theories attempt to explain why some individuals take extraordinary risks by choosing to participate in armed conflict. To date, however, competing accounts have typically not been grounded in systematic, empirical studies of the determinants of participation. In this article, we begin to fill this gap through an examination of the determinants of participation in insurgent and counterinsurgent factions in Sierra Leone's civil war. We find some support for all of the competing theories, suggesting that the rivalry between them is artificial and that theoretical work has insufficiently explored the interaction of various recruitment strategies. At the same time, the empirical results challenge standard interpretations of grievance‐based accounts of participation, as poverty, a lack of access to education, and political alienation predict participation in both rebellion and counterrebellion. Factors that are traditionally seen as indicators of grievance or frustration may instead proxy a for more general susceptibility to engage in violent action or a greater vulnerability to political manipulation by elites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Humphreys and Weinstein (2008) find that socio-economic deprivation and social pressure, in addition to security concerns, motivate individuals, while rejecting the relevance of political grievances.
“Using micro-level data from post-war Sierra Leone, Humphreys and Weinstein (2008) take a broader perspective on individual motivations that highlights socio-economic deprivation and social pressure, in addition to security concerns, while rejecting the relevance of political grievances.”
From Dynamics and Logics of Civil War (2017) · cites this paper as Humphreys and Weinstein (2008)
Actors who have greater confidence in the government will be less susceptible to recruitment.
“As a result, actors who have greater confidence in the government will be less susceptible to recruitment (Humphreys and Weinstein 2008).”
From Conflict Recurrence and Postconflict Justice: Addressing Motivations and Opportunities for Sustainable Peace (2017) · cites this paper as Humphreys and Weinstein 2008
Cites
States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China
Skocpol, T. (1979) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815805 · Cited by 5,408 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Even Theda Skocpol, whose work drew attention to the impact of declining state strength on revolution, pointed to the role of autonomous peasant communities with considerable solidarity as the engine of mobilization (Skocpol 1979).”
BackgroundInsurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador
Wood, E. J. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808685 · Cited by 1,644 · see citing works
Sparks and prairie fires: A theory of unanticipated political revolution
Kuran, T. (1989) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/bf00116762 · Cited by 905 · see citing works
Explaining Revolutions in the Contemporary Third World
Goodwin, J., & Skocpol, T. (1989) · Politics & Society · doi:10.1177/003232928901700403 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Martin-Shields, C. P., & Stojetz, W. (2019) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.07.011 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Dynamics and Logics of Civil War
Cederman, L.-E., & Vogt, M. (2017) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002717721385 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Renzaho, A. M. N., Kamara, J. K., & Toole, M. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.072 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Loyle, C. E., & Appel, B. J. (2017) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqx045 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
A Conditional Model of Local Income Shock and Civil Conflict
Buhaug, H., Croicu, M., Fjelde, H., & von Uexkull, N. (2021) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/709671 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Why do civil wars occur? Another look at the theoretical dichotomy of opportunity versus grievance
TAYDAS, Z., ENIA, J., & JAMES, P. (2011) · Review of International Studies · doi:10.1017/s026021051100012x · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Humphreys, M., & Weinstein, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 436-455
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5907
- OpenAlex
- W2125800013
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 90.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Keywords
- insurgency, counterinsurgency, rebel recruitment, Sierra Leone civil war, political alienation, poverty, access to education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review