Cited by 760Political Conflict and GovernancePeacebuilding and International SecurityTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Who Fights? The Determinants of Participation in Civil War

Humphreys, Macartan, Weinstein, Jeremy M.·2008·American Journal of Political Science

Abstract

A range of seemingly rival theories attempt to explain why some individuals take extraordinary risks by choosing to participate in armed conflict. To date, however, competing accounts have typically not been grounded in systematic, empirical studies of the determinants of participation. In this article, we begin to fill this gap through an examination of the determinants of participation in insurgent and counterinsurgent factions in Sierra Leone's civil war. We find some support for all of the competing theories, suggesting that the rivalry between them is artificial and that theoretical work has insufficiently explored the interaction of various recruitment strategies. At the same time, the empirical results challenge standard interpretations of grievance‐based accounts of participation, as poverty, a lack of access to education, and political alienation predict participation in both rebellion and counterrebellion. Factors that are traditionally seen as indicators of grievance or frustration may instead proxy a for more general susceptibility to engage in violent action or a greater vulnerability to political manipulation by elites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00322.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humphreys and Weinstein (2008) find that socio-economic deprivation and social pressure, in addition to security concerns, motivate individuals, while rejecting the relevance of political grievances.

    “Using micro-level data from post-war Sierra Leone, Humphreys and Weinstein (2008) take a broader perspective on individual motivations that highlights socio-economic deprivation and social pressure, in addition to security concerns, while rejecting the relevance of political grievances.”

    From Dynamics and Logics of Civil War (2017) · cites this paper as Humphreys and Weinstein (2008)

  • Actors who have greater confidence in the government will be less susceptible to recruitment.

    “As a result, actors who have greater confidence in the government will be less susceptible to recruitment (Humphreys and Weinstein 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Humphreys, M., & Weinstein, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
436-455
ISSN
  • 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5907
OpenAlex
W2125800013
Cited by
760
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 30
FWCI
90.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Keywords
insurgency, counterinsurgency, rebel recruitment, Sierra Leone civil war, political alienation, poverty, access to education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review