Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,050

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference

Levy, Jack S.·2008·Conflict Management and Peace Science

Abstract

I focus on the role of case studies in developing causal explanations. I distinguish between the theoretical purposes of case studies and the case selection strategies or research designs used to advance those objectives. I construct a typology of case studies based on their purposes: idiographic (inductive and theory-guided), hypothesis-generating, hypothesis-testing, and plausibility probe case studies. I then examine different case study research designs, including comparable cases, most and least likely cases, deviant cases, and process tracing, with attention to their different purposes and logics of inference. I address the issue of selection bias and the “single logic” debate, and I emphasize the utility of multi-method research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07388940701860318

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Bates, R., 1998, Analytic narratives
  2. Brams, S.J., 1994, Theory of moves
  3. Collier, D., 1999, APSA-CP Newsletter Winter, 1
  4. Elman, C., 2008, Institutions for qualitative methods
  5. Ethnography meets rational choice. 2006. Qualitative Methods (newsletter) 4(1): 1-33.
  6. 10.2307/2504278 · DOI
  7. George, A.L. 1979. Case studies and theory development. In Lauren, P., ed. Diplomacy: New approaches in theory, history, and policy, New York: Free Press, 43-68.
  8. George, A.L., 1974, Deterrence in American foreign policy
  9. Gochal, J.R., and J.S. Levy. 2004. Crisis mismanagement or conflict of interests? A case study of the Crimean war. In Maoz, Z., ed. Multiple paths to knowledge in international relations , Lexington, MA: Lexington Books , pp. 309-342.
  10. Hobsbawm, E., 1997, On history
  11. 10.2307/1953055 · doi:10.2307/1953055
  12. Larson, D.W. (2001) Sources and methods in Cold War history: The need for a new theory-based archival approach. In Elman, C., and M. F. Elman, eds. Bridges and boundaries, Cambridge: MIT Press, 327-350.
  13. Levy, J.S. 2001. Explaining events and testing theories: History, political science, and the analysis of international relations. In Elman, C., and M. F. Elman, eds. Bridges and boundaries, Cambridge: MIT Press, 39-83.
  14. Levy, J.S. 2002. Qualitative methods in international relations. In Brecher, M., and F. P. Harvey, eds. Millennial reflections on international studies, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 432-454.
  15. Maoz, Z. 2002. Case study methodology in international studies: From storytelling to hypothesis testing. In Brecher, M. and F. P. Harvey, eds. Millennial reflections on international studies, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 455-475.
  16. Multi-method work, dispatches from the front lines. 2007. Qualitative Methods 5(1): 9-28.
  17. Ragin, C.C., 1992, What is a Case?
  18. Stretton, H., 1969, The political sciences: General principles of selection in social science and history
  19. 10.2307/2009730 · doi:10.2307/2009730

Cited by

See all 1,050

Metadata

Authors
Levy, J. S.
Venue
Conflict Management and Peace Science
Published
2008-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 0738-8942 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9219
OpenAlex
W2096247380
Cited by
1,050
References
78
FWCI
17.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07388940701860318
The paper
Levy, J. S. (2008). Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940701860318

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.