The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantile regression, censoring, and the structure of wages
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This chapter develops two empirical applications of quantile regression techniques. The first application examines how the returns to schooling have changed from 1979 to 1987. The second application examines the union relative wage effect in 1987. In both cases our interest is in providing a more detailed description of the conditional distribution of wages. The returns to schooling application is based on forming schooling-experience cells, calculating various sample quantiles within each cell, and then using a minimum-distance estimator to impose a parametric form on the conditional quantile functions. There is a censoring problem because usual weekly earnings in the Current Population Survey are topcoded at $999. Our framework makes it very easy to apply Powell's (1984, 1986) approach to the censoring problem - we only use the cells for which the sample quantile is below the censoring point. The censoring correction has a substantial effect on the estimates in some cases. The returns to schooling tend to increase as we pass from low to high quantiles, both in 1979 and 1987. The returns are substantially higher in 1987 than 1979, and the change is fairly uniform across the quantiles. The second application does not lend itself to forming cells since there are close to 40 covariates. A linear programming algorithm is, however, effective. We find, for the more experienced workers, that the union wage effect declines sharply as we go from low to high quantiles. There is a similar pattern for the industry wage effects in several of the durable manufacturing industries. We also generalize the functional form of the quantile regressions by using a Box-Cox transformation. Our algorithm combines linear programming with a one-dimensional search, by appealing to the equivariance of quantiles under monotone transformations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inference on Counterfactual Distributions
(2013) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta10582 · Cited by 601
Pischke, J. (2007) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02080.x · Cited by 294
Ceilings or floors? Gender wage gaps by education in Spain
de la Rica, S., Dolado, J. J., & Llorens, V. (2008) · Journal of Population Economics · doi:10.1007/s00148-006-0128-1 · Cited by 281
Sensitivity to Missing Data Assumptions: Theory and an Evaluation of the U.S. Wage Structure
Kline, P., & Santos, A. (2013) · Quantitative Economics · doi:10.3982/qe176 · Cited by 58
The Broad Decline in Health and Human Capital of Americans Born after 1947
Reynolds, N. (2025) · American Economic Review: Insights · doi:10.1257/aeri.20230588 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Chamberlain, G.
- Venue
- Advances in Econometrics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2008-12-02
- Pages
- 171-210
- OpenAlex
- W1486944930
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 77.63
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantile regression, censoring, and the structure of wages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/ccol0521444594.005
- The paper
- Chamberlain, G. (2008). Quantile regression, censoring, and the structure of wages. Advances in Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1017/ccol0521444594.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.