Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantile regression, censoring, and the structure of wages

Chamberlain, Gary·2008·Advances in Econometrics

Abstract

INTRODUCTION This chapter develops two empirical applications of quantile regression techniques. The first application examines how the returns to schooling have changed from 1979 to 1987. The second application examines the union relative wage effect in 1987. In both cases our interest is in providing a more detailed description of the conditional distribution of wages. The returns to schooling application is based on forming schooling-experience cells, calculating various sample quantiles within each cell, and then using a minimum-distance estimator to impose a parametric form on the conditional quantile functions. There is a censoring problem because usual weekly earnings in the Current Population Survey are topcoded at $999. Our framework makes it very easy to apply Powell's (1984, 1986) approach to the censoring problem - we only use the cells for which the sample quantile is below the censoring point. The censoring correction has a substantial effect on the estimates in some cases. The returns to schooling tend to increase as we pass from low to high quantiles, both in 1979 and 1987. The returns are substantially higher in 1987 than 1979, and the change is fairly uniform across the quantiles. The second application does not lend itself to forming cells since there are close to 40 covariates. A linear programming algorithm is, however, effective. We find, for the more experienced workers, that the union wage effect declines sharply as we go from low to high quantiles. There is a similar pattern for the industry wage effects in several of the durable manufacturing industries. We also generalize the functional form of the quantile regressions by using a Box-Cox transformation. Our algorithm combines linear programming with a one-dimensional search, by appealing to the equivariance of quantiles under monotone transformations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/ccol0521444594.005

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 398

Metadata

Authors
Chamberlain, G.
Venue
Advances in Econometrics
Published
2008-12-02
Pages
171-210
OpenAlex
W1486944930
Cited by
398
References
0
FWCI
77.63
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantile regression, censoring, and the structure of wages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/ccol0521444594.005
The paper
Chamberlain, G. (2008). Quantile regression, censoring, and the structure of wages. Advances in Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1017/ccol0521444594.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.