Cited by 1Indigenous Studies and EcologyIndigenous Peoples' Rights and LawEnvironmental law and policy

On the edges of extinction: Indigenous whaling governance, the 1977 “bowhead controversy” and its legacy

Open access
Åman, Sonja·2024·Cambridge Prisms: Extinction

Abstract

In its nearly 80-year history, the International Whaling Commission (IWC) has shifted from a “whalers club” to an international governance body chiefly focused on the protection and conservation of global cetacean populations. Drawing on recent scholarship on extinction and its entanglements, this article compares two addresses given by whalers at IWC meetings 40 years apart to problematise the way whaling and its relation to extinction is conceptualised in international environmental governance. Guided by practice-oriented document analysis and recent theorisation of extinction as an entangled process, this article analyses the personal stakeholder testimonies from two different representatives of the North Slope whalers of Northern Alaska to the IWC – one in relation to the 1977 Alaska bowhead whaling controversy and the other in the context of the 2018 negotiations over streamlining Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling management and supporting greater flexibility and Indigenous autonomy. By comparing these two statements from very different points of history for the IWC and the governance of Indigenous whaling, this article illustrates some of the ongoing struggles for environmental governance to recognise extinction as a complex, multifaceted process that reverberates throughout human and more-than-human communities.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This article compares two IWC addresses by North Slope whaler representatives—Edwardsen in 1978 after the 1977 bowhead moratorium and Patkotak in 2018 during ASW negotiations—to argue that extinction in Indigenous whaling governance is an entangled, ongoing process, not only a future ecological event. It contends that expanding the concept of extinction could help the IWC better recognize and mitigate the present reverberations of extinction on whaling communities.

Key findings

  • The 1977 Scientific Committee recommended a total moratorium on bowhead hunting after estimating Bering/Okhotsk bowheads at 6–10% of 1850 population size and noting increased struck-but-lost whales; the Commission voted 16–0 to remove right whales from the aboriginal exemption, effectively banning North Slope Iñupiat/Yupiit bowhead hunts.
  • At the December 1977 Special Meeting, after pressure from the newly formed AEWC, the IWC accepted a modest take of 18 strikes or 12 landed whales, compared with an estimated 106 struck the previous spring; in 1978, after North Slope representatives presented extended monitoring and Edwardsen cited around 300,000 USD in research showing higher bowhead estimates, the Commission reinstated hunts with smaller quotas.
  • The 1978 meeting marked the first time an Indigenous whaling community representative was given the floor; Edwardsen framed the real threat as petrochemical exploitation and asked conservationists for equal concern for “the Eskimo as a species.”
  • In 2018, AEWC vice-chair Crawford Patkotak supported automatic carryover of ASW quotas, noting communities must re-apply every 6 years and face possible denial due to “political disagreements,” as in 1977 and 2002; he described quota uncertainty as a threat to food security and cultural survival.

Methods

  • Practice-oriented document analysis (Asdal and Reinertsen) of IWC meeting reports, verbatim records, and video recordings, comparing two addresses by North Slope whaler representatives: Mr. Edwardsen in 1978 regarding the 1977 bowhead controversy and Crawford Patkotak in 2018 regarding ASW quota negotiations.
  • The article reads these testimonies through extinction studies literature (e.g., Van Dooren, Bird, Jørgensen) to analyze how extinction is conceptualized in Indigenous whaling governance.
  • Author positionality: a white Nordic political ecologist, drawing on “becoming common plantain” to investigate the “settler problem” and deconstruct structures reproducing colonial power relations.

Limitations

  • Stated: the article’s focus is limited to a specific practice (Indigenous whaling governance), though it links this to broader Indigenous self-determination and sovereignty.
  • Evident from the text: the analysis centers on two documented addresses and IWC documents, so its claims are interpretive and historically situated rather than generalizable across all Indigenous whaling communities.
  • Evident from the text: the author acknowledges her positionality as a white Nordic political ecologist and the limitations of academic representation, though she does not frame this as a formal methodological limitation.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/ext.2024.14

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

2 of 34 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    Conflicts over whaling and other similar debates, such as hunting and fishing rights, are directly linked to political and legal infrastructures that have historically worked to marginalise and even erase Indigeneity and Indigenous practices.

    “Conflicts over whaling and other similar debates, such as hunting and fishing rights, are directly linked to political and legal infrastructures that have historically worked to marginalise and even erase Indigeneity and Indigenous practices (see Harris, 2008; Muehlmann, 2009; Durney, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Harris, 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Muehlmann, 2009 source
    • cites Durney, 2020 source
  • Findingown data

    In 1978, the US delegation presented results from an extended bowhead monitoring programme in Alaska showing actual population estimates for bowhead whales were higher than the IWC had expected.

    “In 1978, in collaboration with the North Slope representatives, the US delegation presented results from their extended bowhead monitoring programme in Alaska. The findings evidenced that the actual population estimates for bowhead whales were higher than the IWC had expected, as the AEWC whaling captains had suspected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    In response to the moratorium, nine captains from whaling villages in North Slope established the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC).

    “In response to the sudden moratorium, nine captains from the whaling villages in North Slope established the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    During the 2018 IWC Commission meeting, representatives of Indigenous whaling, including the AEWC, testified in support of increased flexibility and security for Indigenous whaling communities.

    “During a more recent Commission meeting in 2018, representatives of Indigenous whaling, including the AEWC, testified in support of increased flexibility and security for Indigenous whaling communities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    At the 2018 meeting, the IWC negotiated a proposed amendment to the ASW schedule that would allow automatic carryover of ASW quotas and replace the system requiring whalers to re-apply for quotas every 6 years.

    “At the meeting, the IWC negotiated a proposed amendment to the ASW schedule, which would allow an automatic carryover of ASW quotas and thus replace the system in place, which requires whalers to re-apply for their quotas every 6 years (IWC, 2018a, 2018c).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites IWC, 2018a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites IWC, 2018c

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 39
  • May combine two claims. 17
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Jørgensen's notions of how conservation work is often disproportionately driven by anticipation of future extinction speak to some of the shortcomings experienced by Indigenous whalers.

    “Jørgensen’s poignant notions of how conservation work is often disproportionately driven by anticipation of future extinction speak to some of the shortcoming experienced by Indigenous whalers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jørgensen, 2022 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The addresses from North Slope representatives highlight the multifaceted relationship that whales and whalers share, rather than reducing whaling solely to subsistence.

    “Rather than reducing whaling solely to a question of subsistence, what the addresses from North Slope representatives highlight instead the multifaceted relationship that whales and whalers share”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The statements from Edwardsen and Patkotak convey concerns that maintaining a relationship through adapted means cannot secure the social and cultural continuity of a relationship that goes beyond them.

    “but the statements from Edwardsen and Patkotak convey concerns that maintaining a relationship through these adapted means cannot secure the social and cultural continuity of a relationship that goes beyond them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    On several occasions, the AEWC had been forewarned that their request might be denied due to 'political disagreements', as happened in 1977 and again in 2002.

    “He noted that on several occasions, the AEWC had been forewarned that their request might be denied due to “political disagreements” as had happened earlier in 1977 and again in 2002.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    At the end of the controversy and in years following the ASW framework, North Slope villages were left with quotas totalling mere fractions of their previous catches.

    “At the end of the controversy and in the years following the implementation of the ASW framework, North Slope villages were left with quotas that totalled mere fractions of their previous catches.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Patkotak listed considerable work that has gone into adapting hunting methods, improving efficiency, training whaling captains and crew, scientific monitoring, and liaising with the US government and IWC.

    “He listed the considerable amount of work that has gone into adapting hunting methods, improving efficiency and continued training of the whaling captains and crew, on top of the scientific monitoring and liaising with the US government and IWC.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The 1977 decision had been made against the better knowledge of the whaling captains.

    “Patkotak also reminded the Commission that the 1977 decision had been made against the better knowledge of the whaling captains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The IWC and the North Slope whalers work, and have worked, collaboratively to ensure the survival of bowhead whales.

    “The IWC and the North Slope whalers work, and have worked, collaboratively to ensure the survival of bowhead whales.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The Scientific Committee's recommendation was based on evaluation of alarmingly low numbers of bowheads in the Bering and Okhotsk Sea (estimated 6-10% of the 1850 population) and a recent increase in struck-but-lost whales in Alaska.

    “Based on the evaluation of the alarmingly low numbers of bowheads in the Bering and Okhotsk Sea – estimated to be somewhere between 6 and 10% compared to the population size in 1850 – and the recent increase in the numbers of whales struck but lost5 by whalers in Alaska, the Scientific Committee recommended a placement of total moratorium on the hunt and catch of bowhead whales.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    After negotiations, the Commission voted to reinstate Northern Alaska bowhead hunts, with allocated strike quotas much smaller than what the villages were used to.

    “After long and strenuous negotiations, the Commission eventually voted to reinstate the Northern Alaska bowhead hunts, although the allocated strike quotas were much smaller than what the villages were used to.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    At the main IWC meeting in 1977, the Commission voted 16 to 0 to remove 'right whales' from the aboriginal exemption, banning all take.

    “A few weeks later, at the main IWC meeting, the Commission voted 16 to 0 for the removal of “right whales” from the aboriginal exemption, thus banning all and any take (IWC, 1978a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites IWC, 1978a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    Speaking 40 years apart, both Edwardsen and Patkotak highlight the relationship between the bowhead whale, whaling practice and the cultural and social well-being of the whaling communities.

    “Speaking 40 years apart, both Edwardsen and Patkotak highlight the relationship between the bowhead whale, whaling practice and the cultural and social well-being of the whaling communities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    During the previous spring season, the number of whales struck was estimated at 106.

    “Considering that during the previous spring season, the number of whales struck was estimated at 106, the suggested quota was notably low.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The speakers attest to the communities' commitment to walk bowhead whales back from the verge of extinction.

    “The speakers also attest to the communities’ commitment to walk bowhead whales back from the verge of extinction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    In 1982, the IWC formalised the term 'ASW'.

    “Following a series of workshops with natural and social scientists, and some representatives from whaling communities, in 1982, the IWC formalised the term “ASW”.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The people of the North Slope, like other Indigenous whalers, are keenly and intimately aware of the radical decline in whales reaching Alaska each year.

    “The people of the North Slope, like other Indigenous whalers, are keenly and intimately aware of the radical decline in whales reaching Alaska each year.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The article illustrates ongoing struggles for environmental governance to recognise extinction as a complex, multifaceted process that reverberates throughout human and more-than-human communities.

    “By comparing these two statements from very different points of history for the IWC and the governance of Indigenous whaling, this article illustrates some of the ongoing struggles for environmental governance to recognise extinction as a complex, multifaceted process that reverberates throughout human and more-than-human communities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The two selected addresses are suitable and sufficient cases for drawing conclusions about the governance of Indigenous whaling and extinction more generally.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Documents do not simply describe an external reality; they take part in working upon, modifying and transforming that reality.

    “documents and documented records “do not simply describe an external reality ‘out there’: documents also take part in working upon, modifying and transforming that reality” (Asdal, 2015:74).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Asdal, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    For many whaling communities, whales and whaling hold important roles in the processes of social and cultural reproduction.

    “For many whaling communities, whales and whaling hold important roles in the processes of social and cultural reproduction (Kalland, 2009; Coté, 2010; Reid, 2015; Durney, 2020, 2024; Sakakibara, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kalland, 2009 source
    • cites Coté, 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Reid, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The IWC has shifted from a 'whalers club' to an international governance body chiefly focused on the protection and conservation of global cetacean populations over its nearly 80-year history.

    “In its nearly 80-year history, the International Whaling Commission (IWC) has shifted from a “whalers club” to an international governance body chiefly focused on the protection and conservation of global cetacean populations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The IWC's statement of purpose under the 1946 International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling was to provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry.

    “The Commission’s statement of purpose, outlined by the 1946 International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW), consisted of a dual aim to “provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and thus make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry” (ICRW, 1946).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites ICRW, 1946

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The modus operandi of the IWC is to suspend the whales' presence, to avoid an anticipated future extinction.

    “The modus operandi of the IWC is to suspend the whales’ presence, to avoid an anticipated future extinction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Analysing and interpreting historic and future testimonies from whalers with a more expansive approach to extinction clarifies the gravity of the issue for whaling communities and allows for a better understanding of the reverberating effects of extinction in the here and now and how to respond to them.

    “Analysing and interpreting (historic and future) testimonies from whalers with a more expansive approach to extinction not only clarifies the gravity of the issue for whaling communities but also allows for a better understanding of the reverberating effects of extinction in the here and now and how to respond to them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The IWC has played an instrumental role in interrupting multiple extinction events through its development and oversight of protective and regulatory measures for industrial whaling in the past eight decades.

    “Despite the IWC’s undeniably instrumental role in interrupting multiple extinction events through its development and oversight of protective and regulatory measures for industrial whaling in the past eight decades”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Patkotak illustrated the extent to which his community has gone to accommodate the demands of the IWC.

    “He illustrated the extent to which his community has gone to accommodate the demands of the IWC.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The insecurity around the bowhead whale's survival and the continuation of the relationship between whales and whalers has and continues to reverberate through the communities.

    “how the insecurity around the bowhead whale’s survival and the continuation of this relationship has and continues to reverberate through the communities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Recent social science research on the multifaceted effects of the current mass extinction event has been brought together under the umbrella of "extinction studies".

    “Alongside biology and ecology, recent research in the social sciences focused on the multifaceted effects of the current mass extinction event has been brought together under the umbrella of “extinction studies” (Bird et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bird et al., 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Restrictions on carryover quotas put pressure on hunters to meet their strike limits each season, despite seasonal issues like poor or dangerous hunting conditions.

    “Furthermore, restrictions on carryover quotas put pressure on the hunters to meet their strike limits each season, despite seasonal issues like poor or dangerous hunting conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    Managing the intensifying need for conservation measures without severing relationships and fracturing shared lifeways is a considerable, sometimes nearly insurmountable, challenge for international governance bodies like the IWC.

    “Managing the intensifying need for conservation measures without severing relationships and fracturing shared lifeways is a considerable, sometimes nearly insurmountable, challenge for international governance bodies like the IWC.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some identified issues with the current ASW system include removing ASW catch limits from political discussion, obtaining adequate information on ASW catch limits, and ensuring local consumption versus commercialism.

    “Some of the identified issues with the current system include “removing ASW catch limits from political discussion”, “obtaining adequate information on ASW catch limits and “ensuring local consumption versus commercialism” (IWC, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites IWC, 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Comparing Edwardsen's 1978 address and Patkotak's 2018 address demonstrates the lasting legacy of the bowhead whale controversy and what it represents in the longer history of the IWC.

    “Comparing Patkotak’s address of 2018 to that of Edwardsen’s in 1978 demonstrates the lasting legacy of the bowhead whale controversy and what it represents in the longer history of the IWC.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The 1977 bowhead controversy led to a re-examination of the IWC's procedures and within a few years the Commission established a separate subcommittee for Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling (ASW).

    “The events of 1977 led to a re-examination of the IWC’s procedures, and within a few years, the Commission established a separate subcommittee for ASW, which was tasked with redesigning the “aboriginal whaling” clause.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The idea that the importance of whaling is tantamount to its importance as a subsistence activity is historically incorrect, because Indigenous whaling has long been a commercial activity with a significant role in trade and bordering.

    “this idea has been both a. proven historically incorrect, as Indigenous whaling practice has long been a commercial activity with a significant role in trade and practices of bordering (see Coté, 2010; Reid, 2015; Shoemaker, 2015)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Coté, 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Reid, 2015 source
    • cites Shoemaker, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    North Slope communities and bowhead whales have a millennia-long relationship.

    “Drawing on the literature in extinction studies, this article has analysed two statements from North Slope Borough whalers in relation to the governance of Indigenous whaling practice and, as a result, the millennia-long relationship between North Slope communities and bowhead whales.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The testimonies of Edwardsen and Patkotak surpass making their case for a quota renewal as they illustrate how the people in North Slope communities are already living with and adapting to what the IWC considers a potential future scenario.

    “Their testimonies surpass making their case for a quota renewal as they illustrate how the people in North Slope communities, in many ways, are already living with and adapting to what the IWC considers a (undoubtedly the worst-case) potential future scenario.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although IWC decision-making processes have become more inclusive and integrated more multi-vocality in the past four decades, the impact of the bowhead controversy is not neatly contained in the past.

    “Although IWC decision-making processes have become more inclusive and integrated more multi-vocality in the past four decades, the impact of the bowhead whale controversy is not neatly contained in the past.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    At the 2018 meeting, after addressing the quota systems for Indigenous whalers, the IWC moved forward with plans to renegotiate aspects of the ASW framework based on recommendations drafted by the ASW SubCommittee and an ad hoc working group on the matter.

    “At the 2018 meeting, after addressing the quota systems for Indigenous whalers discussed in this article, the IWC moved forward with plans to renegotiate aspects of the ASW framework based on recommendations drafted by the ASW SubCommittee and an ad hoc working group on the matter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    An expanded and nuanced conceptualisation of extinction could benefit the governance of Indigenous whaling, as reckoning with the reverberating effects of extinction on whaling communities can provide pathways for the IWC to develop and integrate improved tools for more holistic governance.

    “Furthermore, I argue that an expanded and nuanced conceptualisation of extinction could benefit the governance of Indigenous whaling, as reckoning with the reverberating effects (the threat of) extinction is already having on whaling communities can provide pathways for the IWC to develop and integrate improved tools for more holistic governance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Based on the two addresses, frameworks like ASW can benefit from expanding and complicating the concept of extinction and from implementing tools that recognise that extinction sits in complex webs of human and more-than-human relations.

    “Based on the two addresses discussed here, I argue that frameworks like ASW can benefit from expanding and complicating the concept of extinction and from implementing tools that recognise that extinction sits in complex webs of human and more-than-human relations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Conflicts over whaling and similar debates can be used to protect and secure Indigenous futures.

    “But they can, too, be used to protect and secure Indigenous futures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    How environmental governance regimes define extinction - what it means and for whom - contributes to the wider dynamics of Indigenous self-determination and sovereignty.

    “In the wider perspective, how environmental governance regimes define extinction – what it means and for whom – also contributes to the wider dynamics of Indigenous self-determination and sovereignty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Double death is "the unmaking of country, unravelling the work of generation upon generation of living beings; cascades of death that curtail the future and unmake the living presence of the past. The death of temporal, fleshy, metabolic relationships across generations and species".

    “She defines double death as “the unmaking of country, unravelling the work of generation upon generation of living beings; cascades of death that curtail the future and unmake the living presence of the past. The death of temporal, fleshy, metabolic relationships across generations and species” (Bird, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bird, 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Extinction involves far more than biodiversity in the narrow sense; it also puts at stake human and more-than-human ways of life, mourning, livelihoods, and cultural and religious worlds.

    “far more than ‘biodiversity’ - at least in the narrow sense that the term is often used - is at stake in extinction: human and more-than human ways of life, ways of mourning and being with others, even livelihoods and diverse cultural and religious worlds are often drawn into the fray as species move towards, and then beyond, the edge of extinction” (Van Dooren, 2014:7–8).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Van Dooren, 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Given adequate weight and consideration, testimonies such as those analysed can improve the understanding of how extinctions are experienced in the here and now, and how they already work to modify, disrupt and sever long-standing and mutually held relations.

    “Through its analysis, this article illustrates that given adequate weight and consideration, testimonies such as these can improve the understanding of how extinctions are experienced in the here and now, and how they already work to modify, disrupt and sever long-standing and mutually held relations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The whalers' statements concretise that the loss stemming from extinction is not only felt in the immediate loss of livelihoods and material practices, but in the loss of continuity and the sense of belonging gained through multigenerational and ancestral pasts that have been intertwined with bowheads.

    “The whalers’ statements concretise that the loss stemming from extinction is not only felt in the immediate loss of livelihoods and material practices, but in the loss of continuity and the sense of belonging gained through multigenerational (and ancestral) pasts that have, up until now, been intertwined with bowheads.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    For the whalers, the threat of bowhead extinction poses the threat of a multidimensional process of loss.

    “For the whalers, the threat of bowhead extinction poses the threat of a multidimensional process of loss.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The governance of Indigenous whaling has improved significantly in the past four decades in representational politics and collaboration with Indigenous communities.

    “Although the governance of Indigenous whaling has improved significantly in the past four decades when it comes to representational politics and collaboration with Indigenous communities”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The presence of whales is directly connected to the reproduction of a relationship established since "time immemorial" that fosters cultural and food security and enables the passing down of knowledge and traditions.

    “They illustrate how the presence of whales is directly connected to the reproduction of a relationship that has been established since “time immemorial” – one that fosters cultural and food security and enables the passing down of knowledge and traditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In response to pushback on whaling, the IWC started work on an updated management regime in the early 1970s and shifted from industrial resource management towards marine conservation.

    “In response to the pushback on whaling, the IWC started work on an updated management regime for whaling in the early 1970s. Shifting from a model of industrial resource management more towards marine conservation (Birnie, 1985; Kalland, 1993, 2009; Stone, 2001), the Commission also decided to take on a more active role in the management of Indigenous whaling practices.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Birnie, 1985
    • cites Kalland, 1993 source
    • cites Stone, 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

49 of 49
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The IWC's online archive contains comprehensive records of its proceedings since its establishment.

    “The IWC has kept comprehensive records of its proceedings since its establishment. Meeting reports, verbatim records and supplementary materials are available through the Commission’s online archive.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The two selected addresses are suitable and sufficient cases for drawing conclusions about the governance of Indigenous whaling and extinction more generally.

    “This article highlights two documented addresses in IWC history, both relating to the customary hunts of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) in today’s Northern Alaska.”
    “The addresses act as an entry point to a discussion about extinction and the entangled relationship between whaling governance and Indigenous practices and livelihoods”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The documents used (meeting reports, verbatim records, video recordings) accurately record the addresses and proceedings.

    “Practice-oriented document analysis is used as a guiding framework for working with meeting reports, verbatim records and video recordings.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 1977 and 2018 addresses are comparable despite their different historical contexts.

    “By comparing these two statements from very different points of history for the IWC and the governance of Indigenous whaling, this article illustrates some of the ongoing struggles for environmental governance to recognise extinction as a complex, multifaceted process that reverberates throughout human and more-than-human communities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.

    “Comparing Patkotak’s address of 2018 to that of Edwardsen’s in 1978 demonstrates the lasting legacy of the bowhead whale controversy and what it represents in the longer history of the IWC.”
5 of 5

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Trouillot, 1991, Recapturing Anthropology, 17
  2. Coté, 2010, Spirits of our Whaling Ancestors: Revitilizing Makah and Nuu-Chah-Nulth Traditions
  3. Åman, S (2023) Governing the People of the Whale: History and Politics of Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling. PhD dissertation, Department of Culture Studies and Oriental Languages, University of Oslo, Oslo.
  4. Roman, 2006, Whale
  5. Freeman, 2001, Toward a Sustainable Whaling Regime, 123
  6. International Whaling Commission (2018b) IWC67 - Day 2 (International Whaling Commission), video recording of IWC proceedings. Available on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLu5U7nt3Zo&list=PLG6rqLl_ABObX6uKS3fX3N6FtZ2Yz-2zO&index=11.
  7. Roberts, 2010, Treaty rights ignored: Neocolonialism and the Makah whale hunt, The Kenyon Review, 31, 78
  8. Bird, 2017, Extinction Studies: Stories of Time, Death, and Generations
  9. Friedheim, 2001, (ed.), Toward a Sustainable Whaling Regime, 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Åman, S.
Affiliations
University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Åman, Sonja
Venue
Cambridge Prisms: Extinction
Published
2024
Volume
2
Pages
e10-e10
ISSN
2755-0958 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402371777
Cited by
0
References
31
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cambridge Prisms Extinction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Research Council (803211)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
Keywords
International Whaling Commission, bowhead whale, extinction, indigenous autonomy, cetacean conservation, global environmental governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-26.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-26.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review