On the edges of extinction: Indigenous whaling governance, the 1977 “bowhead controversy” and its legacy
Open accessAbstract
In its nearly 80-year history, the International Whaling Commission (IWC) has shifted from a “whalers club” to an international governance body chiefly focused on the protection and conservation of global cetacean populations. Drawing on recent scholarship on extinction and its entanglements, this article compares two addresses given by whalers at IWC meetings 40 years apart to problematise the way whaling and its relation to extinction is conceptualised in international environmental governance. Guided by practice-oriented document analysis and recent theorisation of extinction as an entangled process, this article analyses the personal stakeholder testimonies from two different representatives of the North Slope whalers of Northern Alaska to the IWC – one in relation to the 1977 Alaska bowhead whaling controversy and the other in the context of the 2018 negotiations over streamlining Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling management and supporting greater flexibility and Indigenous autonomy. By comparing these two statements from very different points of history for the IWC and the governance of Indigenous whaling, this article illustrates some of the ongoing struggles for environmental governance to recognise extinction as a complex, multifaceted process that reverberates throughout human and more-than-human communities.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This article compares two IWC addresses by North Slope whaler representatives—Edwardsen in 1978 after the 1977 bowhead moratorium and Patkotak in 2018 during ASW negotiations—to argue that extinction in Indigenous whaling governance is an entangled, ongoing process, not only a future ecological event. It contends that expanding the concept of extinction could help the IWC better recognize and mitigate the present reverberations of extinction on whaling communities.
Key findings
- The 1977 Scientific Committee recommended a total moratorium on bowhead hunting after estimating Bering/Okhotsk bowheads at 6–10% of 1850 population size and noting increased struck-but-lost whales; the Commission voted 16–0 to remove right whales from the aboriginal exemption, effectively banning North Slope Iñupiat/Yupiit bowhead hunts.
- At the December 1977 Special Meeting, after pressure from the newly formed AEWC, the IWC accepted a modest take of 18 strikes or 12 landed whales, compared with an estimated 106 struck the previous spring; in 1978, after North Slope representatives presented extended monitoring and Edwardsen cited around 300,000 USD in research showing higher bowhead estimates, the Commission reinstated hunts with smaller quotas.
- The 1978 meeting marked the first time an Indigenous whaling community representative was given the floor; Edwardsen framed the real threat as petrochemical exploitation and asked conservationists for equal concern for “the Eskimo as a species.”
- In 2018, AEWC vice-chair Crawford Patkotak supported automatic carryover of ASW quotas, noting communities must re-apply every 6 years and face possible denial due to “political disagreements,” as in 1977 and 2002; he described quota uncertainty as a threat to food security and cultural survival.
Methods
- Practice-oriented document analysis (Asdal and Reinertsen) of IWC meeting reports, verbatim records, and video recordings, comparing two addresses by North Slope whaler representatives: Mr. Edwardsen in 1978 regarding the 1977 bowhead controversy and Crawford Patkotak in 2018 regarding ASW quota negotiations.
- The article reads these testimonies through extinction studies literature (e.g., Van Dooren, Bird, Jørgensen) to analyze how extinction is conceptualized in Indigenous whaling governance.
- Author positionality: a white Nordic political ecologist, drawing on “becoming common plantain” to investigate the “settler problem” and deconstruct structures reproducing colonial power relations.
Limitations
- Stated: the article’s focus is limited to a specific practice (Indigenous whaling governance), though it links this to broader Indigenous self-determination and sovereignty.
- Evident from the text: the analysis centers on two documented addresses and IWC documents, so its claims are interpretive and historically situated rather than generalizable across all Indigenous whaling communities.
- Evident from the text: the author acknowledges her positionality as a white Nordic political ecologist and the limitations of academic representation, though she does not frame this as a formal methodological limitation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
2 of 34 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Conflicts over whaling and other similar debates, such as hunting and fishing rights, are directly linked to political and legal infrastructures that have historically worked to marginalise and even erase Indigeneity and Indigenous practices.
“Conflicts over whaling and other similar debates, such as hunting and fishing rights, are directly linked to political and legal infrastructures that have historically worked to marginalise and even erase Indigeneity and Indigenous practices (see Harris, 2008; Muehlmann, 2009; Durney, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
In 1978, the US delegation presented results from an extended bowhead monitoring programme in Alaska showing actual population estimates for bowhead whales were higher than the IWC had expected.
“In 1978, in collaboration with the North Slope representatives, the US delegation presented results from their extended bowhead monitoring programme in Alaska. The findings evidenced that the actual population estimates for bowhead whales were higher than the IWC had expected, as the AEWC whaling captains had suspected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
In response to the moratorium, nine captains from whaling villages in North Slope established the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC).
“In response to the sudden moratorium, nine captains from the whaling villages in North Slope established the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
During the 2018 IWC Commission meeting, representatives of Indigenous whaling, including the AEWC, testified in support of increased flexibility and security for Indigenous whaling communities.
“During a more recent Commission meeting in 2018, representatives of Indigenous whaling, including the AEWC, testified in support of increased flexibility and security for Indigenous whaling communities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
At the 2018 meeting, the IWC negotiated a proposed amendment to the ASW schedule that would allow automatic carryover of ASW quotas and replace the system requiring whalers to re-apply for quotas every 6 years.
“At the meeting, the IWC negotiated a proposed amendment to the ASW schedule, which would allow an automatic carryover of ASW quotas and thus replace the system in place, which requires whalers to re-apply for their quotas every 6 years (IWC, 2018a, 2018c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites IWC, 2018a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites IWC, 2018c
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
Both Edwardsen and Patkotak draw attention to the lengths to which the North Slope villages and the AEWC have gone to improve the efficiency of their practice and to lead the scientific work done for monitoring and protecting populations.
“Both draw attention to the lengths to which the North Slope villages and the AEWC have gone to improve the efficiency of their practice and to lead the scientific work done for monitoring and protecting populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
- Findingreasoning
In June 1977, the IWC Scientific Committee recommended a total moratorium on the hunt and catch of bowhead whales.
“the Scientific Committee recommended a placement of total moratorium on the hunt and catch of bowhead whales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The proposal secured a harvest of 18 strikes or 12 landed whales.
“The proposal secured a harvest of 18 strikes or 12 landed whales (IWC, 1977c:4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IWC, 1977c
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
The North Slope communities had not been heard by the IWC regarding their needs or view on the matter before the 1977 decision.
“It is central to note that the North Slope communities themselves had not at any point thus far been heard by the IWC regarding their needs or view on the matter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
At the December 1977 Special Meeting, the Commission accepted a proposal for a modest take of bowhead whales to satisfy the subsistence and cultural needs of North Slope communities.
“the Commission accepted a proposal “for a modest take of bowhead whales to satisfy the subsistence and cultural needs” (IWC, 1977d:48) for the North Slope communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IWC, 1977d
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
The 1978 meeting marked the first time a representative of an Indigenous whaling community was given the floor at a Commission meeting.
“What makes the 1978 meeting one of a kind in the history of the IWC is that it marked the first time a representative of an Indigenous whaling community was given the floor at a Commission meeting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Apart from occasional take by Siberian Yupik, the Iñupiat and Yupiit whalers of North Slope Borough have remained the only Indigenous communities to hunt bowheads under the exemption.
“Apart from occasional take by the Siberian Yupik, the Iñupiat and Yupiit whalers6 of North Slope Borough in today’s Northern Alaska have remained the only Indigenous communities to hunt bowheads under the exemption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
With increased pressure from the AEWC, the US Commissioner eventually agreed to bring up the matter at the Special Meeting of the IWC in December 1977.
“However, with increased pressure from the AEWC, the Commissioner eventually agreed to bring up the matter at the Special Meeting of the IWC that took place 6 months later in December 1977.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Comparing two addresses given by whalers at IWC meetings 40 years apart problematises the way whaling and its relation to extinction is conceptualised in international environmental governance.
“Drawing on recent scholarship on extinction and its entanglements, this article compares two addresses given by whalers at IWC meetings 40 years apart to problematise the way whaling and its relation to extinction is conceptualised in international environmental governance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two selected addresses are suitable and sufficient cases for drawing conclusions about the governance of Indigenous whaling and extinction more generally.
- Rests on an assumption: The 1977 and 2018 addresses are comparable despite their different historical contexts.
- Interpretationreasoning
The controversy did not lead to immediate or sizeable improvement for the whalers themselves.
“However, it did not lead to immediate or sizeable improvement for the whalers themselves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The testimonies of North Slope whalers reveal some of the blind spots in conservation and environmental management regimes.
“Furthermore, the testimonies of North Slope whalers reveal some of the blind spots in conservation and environmental management regimes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Whales and whaling are an integral part of the maintenance of social and cultural practices - a mutually shared way of life.
“Whales and whaling are an integral part of the maintenance of social and cultural practices – a mutually shared way of life.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By removing right whales from the aboriginal exemption, the Commission effectively terminated the legality of North Slope bowhead hunts.
“By removing right whales from the aboriginal exemption clause, the Commission effectively terminated the legality of their hunts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The changes in response to the North Slope case did not erase the harm caused by the Commission's actions.
“For the North Slope communities, the changes taking place in response to their case did not erase the harm caused by the Commission’s actions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The IWC has struggled to frame Indigenous whaling as a practice that is not a threat to whales but one that maintains a relationship and is inherently committed to the survival and thriving of bowhead populations.
“IWC’s has struggled to frame Indigenous whaling as a practice that is not a threat to whales but one that maintains a relationship and is inherently committed to the survival and thriving of bowhead populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
To qualify under the previous "aboriginal exemption" and the current ASW framework, all Indigenous whalers are asked to prove a continuing "dependence on whaling and on the use of whales".
“To qualify under the previous “aboriginal exemption” and the current ASW framework, all Indigenous whalers are asked to prove a continuing “dependence on whaling and on the use of whales” (IWC, 1982).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IWC, 1982
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The threat of severing relations that have been fostered across generations since time immemorial resembles what Bird (2014) has called double death.
“First, the threat of severing relations that have been fostered across generations – since time immemorial – keenly resembles what anthropologist and scholar of environmental humanities Bird (2014) has called double death.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bird, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Scholars like Roberts (2010) and Reid (2015) have demonstrated that by defining Indigenous whaling as a "subsistence" activity and prohibiting the whalers' self-determination over their marine tenure and marine-based livelihoods, conservation and environmental governance have undermined Indigenous communities' legal and treaty rights.
“Scholars like Roberts (2010) and Reid (2015) have demonstrated that by defining Indigenous whaling as a “subsistence” activity and prohibiting the whalers’ self-determination over their marine tenure and marine-based livelihoods, conservation and environmental governance have undermined Indigenous communities’ legal and treaty rights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Roberts, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Reid, 2015 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Reading the testimonies in dialogue with extinction studies, they embody the entangled and multifaceted process of extinction in two ways.
“Reading these testimonies in dialogue with extinction studies, they embody the entangled and multifaceted process of extinction in two ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The Commission decided to take on a more active role in the management of Indigenous whaling practices.
“Shifting from a model of industrial resource management more towards marine conservation (Birnie, 1985; Kalland, 1993, 2009; Stone, 2001), the Commission also decided to take on a more active role in the management of Indigenous whaling practices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Birnie, 1985
- cites Kalland, 1993 source
- cites Stone, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Indigenous whaling practice has proven to be a challenge for the IWC.
“Indigenous whaling practice has proven to be a challenge for the Commission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The significant involvement of communities in conservation work demonstrates the continued centrality of whales.
“The significant involvement of communities in conservation work demonstrates the continued centrality of whales”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For whaling communities, the reverberations of extinction are already present - in the loss of access and the shrinking opportunities to pass down environmental and cultural knowledge tied to material, cultural and spiritual practices and that maintain their mutual relationship with whales.
“For whaling communities, however, the reverberations of extinction are already present – in the loss of access and the shrinking opportunities to pass down environmental and cultural knowledge that is tied to material, cultural and spiritual practices (i.e., recipes, crafts, rituals) and that maintain their mutual relationship with whales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The subsistence framing of Indigenous whaling has been criticised for reproducing the idea of the "tribal slot" by trapping customary practice in a static state of "authenticity" dictated by colonial imaginaries.
“been criticised for reproducing the idea of the “tribal slot” by trapping customary practice in a static state of “authenticity” dictated by colonial imaginaries (see Trouillot, 1991; Li, 2000; Muehlmann, 2009; Brigham, 2017; Durney, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Trouillot, 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Li, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Muehlmann, 2009 source
- Premisenone given
Arctic bowhead whales are grouped under the larger umbrella of 'right whales' according to the IWC's species specifications.
“According to the IWC’s species specifications, Arctic bowhead whales are grouped under the larger umbrella of “right whales”.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The whalers' actions led to a controversy big enough for the IWC to rethink its governance model for Indigenous hunts.
“This is not to say that the whalers were passive victims – on the contrary, their actions led to a controversy big enough for the IWC to rethink their governance model for Indigenous hunts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Increased concerns over the IWC's conservation and stock protection measures meant the 'aboriginal exemption' came under scrutiny.
“Increased concerns over the IWC’s conservation and stock protection measures meant that the so-called “aboriginal exemption” also came under scrutiny.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The IWC and the North Slope whalers are grappling with potential extinction in different ways.
“Yet, the two are grappling with potential extinction in different ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The requirement to re-apply every 6 years has meant whaling communities face the threat of the Commission not approving their hunts.
“In practice, this has meant that every 6 years, whaling communities are faced with the threat of the Commission not approving their hunts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 39
- May combine two claims. 17
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationJørgensen's notions of how conservation work is often disproportionately driven by anticipation of future extinction speak to some of the shortcomings experienced by Indigenous whalers.
“Jørgensen’s poignant notions of how conservation work is often disproportionately driven by anticipation of future extinction speak to some of the shortcoming experienced by Indigenous whalers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Jørgensen, 2022 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningThe addresses from North Slope representatives highlight the multifaceted relationship that whales and whalers share, rather than reducing whaling solely to subsistence.
“Rather than reducing whaling solely to a question of subsistence, what the addresses from North Slope representatives highlight instead the multifaceted relationship that whales and whalers share”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningThe statements from Edwardsen and Patkotak convey concerns that maintaining a relationship through adapted means cannot secure the social and cultural continuity of a relationship that goes beyond them.
“but the statements from Edwardsen and Patkotak convey concerns that maintaining a relationship through these adapted means cannot secure the social and cultural continuity of a relationship that goes beyond them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationOn several occasions, the AEWC had been forewarned that their request might be denied due to 'political disagreements', as happened in 1977 and again in 2002.
“He noted that on several occasions, the AEWC had been forewarned that their request might be denied due to “political disagreements” as had happened earlier in 1977 and again in 2002.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenAt the end of the controversy and in years following the ASW framework, North Slope villages were left with quotas totalling mere fractions of their previous catches.
“At the end of the controversy and in the years following the implementation of the ASW framework, North Slope villages were left with quotas that totalled mere fractions of their previous catches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationPatkotak listed considerable work that has gone into adapting hunting methods, improving efficiency, training whaling captains and crew, scientific monitoring, and liaising with the US government and IWC.
“He listed the considerable amount of work that has gone into adapting hunting methods, improving efficiency and continued training of the whaling captains and crew, on top of the scientific monitoring and liaising with the US government and IWC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe 1977 decision had been made against the better knowledge of the whaling captains.
“Patkotak also reminded the Commission that the 1977 decision had been made against the better knowledge of the whaling captains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe IWC and the North Slope whalers work, and have worked, collaboratively to ensure the survival of bowhead whales.
“The IWC and the North Slope whalers work, and have worked, collaboratively to ensure the survival of bowhead whales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe Scientific Committee's recommendation was based on evaluation of alarmingly low numbers of bowheads in the Bering and Okhotsk Sea (estimated 6-10% of the 1850 population) and a recent increase in struck-but-lost whales in Alaska.
“Based on the evaluation of the alarmingly low numbers of bowheads in the Bering and Okhotsk Sea – estimated to be somewhere between 6 and 10% compared to the population size in 1850 – and the recent increase in the numbers of whales struck but lost5 by whalers in Alaska, the Scientific Committee recommended a placement of total moratorium on the hunt and catch of bowhead whales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAfter negotiations, the Commission voted to reinstate Northern Alaska bowhead hunts, with allocated strike quotas much smaller than what the villages were used to.
“After long and strenuous negotiations, the Commission eventually voted to reinstate the Northern Alaska bowhead hunts, although the allocated strike quotas were much smaller than what the villages were used to.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationAt the main IWC meeting in 1977, the Commission voted 16 to 0 to remove 'right whales' from the aboriginal exemption, banning all take.
“A few weeks later, at the main IWC meeting, the Commission voted 16 to 0 for the removal of “right whales” from the aboriginal exemption, thus banning all and any take (IWC, 1978a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IWC, 1978a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningSpeaking 40 years apart, both Edwardsen and Patkotak highlight the relationship between the bowhead whale, whaling practice and the cultural and social well-being of the whaling communities.
“Speaking 40 years apart, both Edwardsen and Patkotak highlight the relationship between the bowhead whale, whaling practice and the cultural and social well-being of the whaling communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenDuring the previous spring season, the number of whales struck was estimated at 106.
“Considering that during the previous spring season, the number of whales struck was estimated at 106, the suggested quota was notably low.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe speakers attest to the communities' commitment to walk bowhead whales back from the verge of extinction.
“The speakers also attest to the communities’ commitment to walk bowhead whales back from the verge of extinction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningIn 1982, the IWC formalised the term 'ASW'.
“Following a series of workshops with natural and social scientists, and some representatives from whaling communities, in 1982, the IWC formalised the term “ASW”.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe people of the North Slope, like other Indigenous whalers, are keenly and intimately aware of the radical decline in whales reaching Alaska each year.
“The people of the North Slope, like other Indigenous whalers, are keenly and intimately aware of the radical decline in whales reaching Alaska each year.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataThe article illustrates ongoing struggles for environmental governance to recognise extinction as a complex, multifaceted process that reverberates throughout human and more-than-human communities.
“By comparing these two statements from very different points of history for the IWC and the governance of Indigenous whaling, this article illustrates some of the ongoing struggles for environmental governance to recognise extinction as a complex, multifaceted process that reverberates throughout human and more-than-human communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two selected addresses are suitable and sufficient cases for drawing conclusions about the governance of Indigenous whaling and extinction more generally.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationDocuments do not simply describe an external reality; they take part in working upon, modifying and transforming that reality.
“documents and documented records “do not simply describe an external reality ‘out there’: documents also take part in working upon, modifying and transforming that reality” (Asdal, 2015:74).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Asdal, 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFor many whaling communities, whales and whaling hold important roles in the processes of social and cultural reproduction.
“For many whaling communities, whales and whaling hold important roles in the processes of social and cultural reproduction (Kalland, 2009; Coté, 2010; Reid, 2015; Durney, 2020, 2024; Sakakibara, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe IWC has shifted from a 'whalers club' to an international governance body chiefly focused on the protection and conservation of global cetacean populations over its nearly 80-year history.
“In its nearly 80-year history, the International Whaling Commission (IWC) has shifted from a “whalers club” to an international governance body chiefly focused on the protection and conservation of global cetacean populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe IWC's statement of purpose under the 1946 International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling was to provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry.
“The Commission’s statement of purpose, outlined by the 1946 International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW), consisted of a dual aim to “provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and thus make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry” (ICRW, 1946).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites ICRW, 1946
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe modus operandi of the IWC is to suspend the whales' presence, to avoid an anticipated future extinction.
“The modus operandi of the IWC is to suspend the whales’ presence, to avoid an anticipated future extinction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAnalysing and interpreting historic and future testimonies from whalers with a more expansive approach to extinction clarifies the gravity of the issue for whaling communities and allows for a better understanding of the reverberating effects of extinction in the here and now and how to respond to them.
“Analysing and interpreting (historic and future) testimonies from whalers with a more expansive approach to extinction not only clarifies the gravity of the issue for whaling communities but also allows for a better understanding of the reverberating effects of extinction in the here and now and how to respond to them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe IWC has played an instrumental role in interrupting multiple extinction events through its development and oversight of protective and regulatory measures for industrial whaling in the past eight decades.
“Despite the IWC’s undeniably instrumental role in interrupting multiple extinction events through its development and oversight of protective and regulatory measures for industrial whaling in the past eight decades”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningPatkotak illustrated the extent to which his community has gone to accommodate the demands of the IWC.
“He illustrated the extent to which his community has gone to accommodate the demands of the IWC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe insecurity around the bowhead whale's survival and the continuation of the relationship between whales and whalers has and continues to reverberate through the communities.
“how the insecurity around the bowhead whale’s survival and the continuation of this relationship has and continues to reverberate through the communities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent social science research on the multifaceted effects of the current mass extinction event has been brought together under the umbrella of "extinction studies".
“Alongside biology and ecology, recent research in the social sciences focused on the multifaceted effects of the current mass extinction event has been brought together under the umbrella of “extinction studies” (Bird et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bird et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenRestrictions on carryover quotas put pressure on hunters to meet their strike limits each season, despite seasonal issues like poor or dangerous hunting conditions.
“Furthermore, restrictions on carryover quotas put pressure on the hunters to meet their strike limits each season, despite seasonal issues like poor or dangerous hunting conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenManaging the intensifying need for conservation measures without severing relationships and fracturing shared lifeways is a considerable, sometimes nearly insurmountable, challenge for international governance bodies like the IWC.
“Managing the intensifying need for conservation measures without severing relationships and fracturing shared lifeways is a considerable, sometimes nearly insurmountable, challenge for international governance bodies like the IWC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome identified issues with the current ASW system include removing ASW catch limits from political discussion, obtaining adequate information on ASW catch limits, and ensuring local consumption versus commercialism.
“Some of the identified issues with the current system include “removing ASW catch limits from political discussion”, “obtaining adequate information on ASW catch limits and “ensuring local consumption versus commercialism” (IWC, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IWC, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenComparing Edwardsen's 1978 address and Patkotak's 2018 address demonstrates the lasting legacy of the bowhead whale controversy and what it represents in the longer history of the IWC.
“Comparing Patkotak’s address of 2018 to that of Edwardsen’s in 1978 demonstrates the lasting legacy of the bowhead whale controversy and what it represents in the longer history of the IWC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe 1977 bowhead controversy led to a re-examination of the IWC's procedures and within a few years the Commission established a separate subcommittee for Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling (ASW).
“The events of 1977 led to a re-examination of the IWC’s procedures, and within a few years, the Commission established a separate subcommittee for ASW, which was tasked with redesigning the “aboriginal whaling” clause.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe idea that the importance of whaling is tantamount to its importance as a subsistence activity is historically incorrect, because Indigenous whaling has long been a commercial activity with a significant role in trade and bordering.
“this idea has been both a. proven historically incorrect, as Indigenous whaling practice has long been a commercial activity with a significant role in trade and practices of bordering (see Coté, 2010; Reid, 2015; Shoemaker, 2015)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenNorth Slope communities and bowhead whales have a millennia-long relationship.
“Drawing on the literature in extinction studies, this article has analysed two statements from North Slope Borough whalers in relation to the governance of Indigenous whaling practice and, as a result, the millennia-long relationship between North Slope communities and bowhead whales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe testimonies of Edwardsen and Patkotak surpass making their case for a quota renewal as they illustrate how the people in North Slope communities are already living with and adapting to what the IWC considers a potential future scenario.
“Their testimonies surpass making their case for a quota renewal as they illustrate how the people in North Slope communities, in many ways, are already living with and adapting to what the IWC considers a (undoubtedly the worst-case) potential future scenario.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough IWC decision-making processes have become more inclusive and integrated more multi-vocality in the past four decades, the impact of the bowhead controversy is not neatly contained in the past.
“Although IWC decision-making processes have become more inclusive and integrated more multi-vocality in the past four decades, the impact of the bowhead whale controversy is not neatly contained in the past.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAt the 2018 meeting, after addressing the quota systems for Indigenous whalers, the IWC moved forward with plans to renegotiate aspects of the ASW framework based on recommendations drafted by the ASW SubCommittee and an ad hoc working group on the matter.
“At the 2018 meeting, after addressing the quota systems for Indigenous whalers discussed in this article, the IWC moved forward with plans to renegotiate aspects of the ASW framework based on recommendations drafted by the ASW SubCommittee and an ad hoc working group on the matter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAn expanded and nuanced conceptualisation of extinction could benefit the governance of Indigenous whaling, as reckoning with the reverberating effects of extinction on whaling communities can provide pathways for the IWC to develop and integrate improved tools for more holistic governance.
“Furthermore, I argue that an expanded and nuanced conceptualisation of extinction could benefit the governance of Indigenous whaling, as reckoning with the reverberating effects (the threat of) extinction is already having on whaling communities can provide pathways for the IWC to develop and integrate improved tools for more holistic governance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBased on the two addresses, frameworks like ASW can benefit from expanding and complicating the concept of extinction and from implementing tools that recognise that extinction sits in complex webs of human and more-than-human relations.
“Based on the two addresses discussed here, I argue that frameworks like ASW can benefit from expanding and complicating the concept of extinction and from implementing tools that recognise that extinction sits in complex webs of human and more-than-human relations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningConflicts over whaling and similar debates can be used to protect and secure Indigenous futures.
“But they can, too, be used to protect and secure Indigenous futures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationHow environmental governance regimes define extinction - what it means and for whom - contributes to the wider dynamics of Indigenous self-determination and sovereignty.
“In the wider perspective, how environmental governance regimes define extinction – what it means and for whom – also contributes to the wider dynamics of Indigenous self-determination and sovereignty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationDouble death is "the unmaking of country, unravelling the work of generation upon generation of living beings; cascades of death that curtail the future and unmake the living presence of the past. The death of temporal, fleshy, metabolic relationships across generations and species".
“She defines double death as “the unmaking of country, unravelling the work of generation upon generation of living beings; cascades of death that curtail the future and unmake the living presence of the past. The death of temporal, fleshy, metabolic relationships across generations and species” (Bird, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bird, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExtinction involves far more than biodiversity in the narrow sense; it also puts at stake human and more-than-human ways of life, mourning, livelihoods, and cultural and religious worlds.
“far more than ‘biodiversity’ - at least in the narrow sense that the term is often used - is at stake in extinction: human and more-than human ways of life, ways of mourning and being with others, even livelihoods and diverse cultural and religious worlds are often drawn into the fray as species move towards, and then beyond, the edge of extinction” (Van Dooren, 2014:7–8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Dooren, 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGiven adequate weight and consideration, testimonies such as those analysed can improve the understanding of how extinctions are experienced in the here and now, and how they already work to modify, disrupt and sever long-standing and mutually held relations.
“Through its analysis, this article illustrates that given adequate weight and consideration, testimonies such as these can improve the understanding of how extinctions are experienced in the here and now, and how they already work to modify, disrupt and sever long-standing and mutually held relations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe whalers' statements concretise that the loss stemming from extinction is not only felt in the immediate loss of livelihoods and material practices, but in the loss of continuity and the sense of belonging gained through multigenerational and ancestral pasts that have been intertwined with bowheads.
“The whalers’ statements concretise that the loss stemming from extinction is not only felt in the immediate loss of livelihoods and material practices, but in the loss of continuity and the sense of belonging gained through multigenerational (and ancestral) pasts that have, up until now, been intertwined with bowheads.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningFor the whalers, the threat of bowhead extinction poses the threat of a multidimensional process of loss.
“For the whalers, the threat of bowhead extinction poses the threat of a multidimensional process of loss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe governance of Indigenous whaling has improved significantly in the past four decades in representational politics and collaboration with Indigenous communities.
“Although the governance of Indigenous whaling has improved significantly in the past four decades when it comes to representational politics and collaboration with Indigenous communities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe presence of whales is directly connected to the reproduction of a relationship established since "time immemorial" that fosters cultural and food security and enables the passing down of knowledge and traditions.
“They illustrate how the presence of whales is directly connected to the reproduction of a relationship that has been established since “time immemorial” – one that fosters cultural and food security and enables the passing down of knowledge and traditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn response to pushback on whaling, the IWC started work on an updated management regime in the early 1970s and shifted from industrial resource management towards marine conservation.
“In response to the pushback on whaling, the IWC started work on an updated management regime for whaling in the early 1970s. Shifting from a model of industrial resource management more towards marine conservation (Birnie, 1985; Kalland, 1993, 2009; Stone, 2001), the Commission also decided to take on a more active role in the management of Indigenous whaling practices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Birnie, 1985
- cites Kalland, 1993 source
- cites Stone, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
The IWC's online archive contains comprehensive records of its proceedings since its establishment.
“The IWC has kept comprehensive records of its proceedings since its establishment. Meeting reports, verbatim records and supplementary materials are available through the Commission’s online archive.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The two selected addresses are suitable and sufficient cases for drawing conclusions about the governance of Indigenous whaling and extinction more generally.
“This article highlights two documented addresses in IWC history, both relating to the customary hunts of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) in today’s Northern Alaska.”
“The addresses act as an entry point to a discussion about extinction and the entangled relationship between whaling governance and Indigenous practices and livelihoods”
The paper relies on this without support.
The documents used (meeting reports, verbatim records, video recordings) accurately record the addresses and proceedings.
“Practice-oriented document analysis is used as a guiding framework for working with meeting reports, verbatim records and video recordings.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 1977 and 2018 addresses are comparable despite their different historical contexts.
“By comparing these two statements from very different points of history for the IWC and the governance of Indigenous whaling, this article illustrates some of the ongoing struggles for environmental governance to recognise extinction as a complex, multifaceted process that reverberates throughout human and more-than-human communities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The two addresses by Edwardsen (1978) and Patkotak (2018) are representative of North Slope whalers’ perspectives and can support general conclusions about North Slope communities.
“Comparing Patkotak’s address of 2018 to that of Edwardsen’s in 1978 demonstrates the lasting legacy of the bowhead whale controversy and what it represents in the longer history of the IWC.”
Cites
Braiding sweetgrass: indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and the teachings of plants
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-5594 · Cited by 2,288 · see citing works
Articulating Indigenous Identity in Indonesia: Resource Politics and the Tribal Slot
Li, T. M. (2000) · Comparative Studies in Society and History · doi:10.1017/s0010417500002632 · Cited by 1,029 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…(see Coté, 2010; Reid, 2015; Shoemaker, 2015), and b. been criticised for reproducing the idea of the “ tribal slot ” by trapping customary practice in a static state of “ authenticity ” dictated by colonial imaginaries (see Trouillot, 1991; Li, 2000; Muehlmann, 2009; Brigham, 2017; Durney, 2020).”
Flight ways: life and loss at the edge of extinction
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.185511 · Cited by 676 · see citing works
Earthly politics: local and global in environmental governance
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-5511 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
The Power of Words in International Relations
Epstein, C. (2008) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262050920.001.0001 · Cited by 357 · cited 2× · see citing works
“While the knowledge politics and issues of Indigenous self-determination and sovereignty are discussed elsewhere (Epstein, 2008; Kalland, 2009; Roberts, 2010; Viikari, 2022a, 2022b; Åman, 2023), the discussion here draws on the recent work done in theorising extinction to illustrate how the concept…”
Flight Ways: Life and Loss at the Edge of Extinction
van Dooren, T. (2014) · doi:10.7312/columbia/9780231166188.001.0001 · Cited by 306
What is the issue? The transformative capacity of documents
Asdal, K. (2015) · Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1080/1600910x.2015.1022194 · Cited by 129 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In other words, documents and documented records “ do not simply describe an external reality ‘ out there ’ : documents also take part in working upon, modifying and transforming that reality ” (Asdal, 2015:74).”
Muehlmann, S. (2009) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01156.x · Cited by 93 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…(see Coté, 2010; Reid, 2015; Shoemaker, 2015), and b. been criticised for reproducing the idea of the “ tribal slot ” by trapping customary practice in a static state of “ authenticity ” dictated by colonial imaginaries (see Trouillot, 1991; Li, 2000; Muehlmann, 2009; Brigham, 2017; Durney, 2020).”
Silence and Articulation—Whiteness, Racialization and Feminist Memory Work
Berg, A. (2008) · NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research · doi:10.1080/08038740802446492 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Unveiling the whale: discourses on whales and whaling
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6939 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Gambell, R. (1993) · ARCTIC · doi:10.14430/arctic1330 · Cited by 71 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For more details, see Gambell (1993).”
Toward a sustainable whaling regime
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-1557 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Reid, J. L. (2015) · doi:10.12987/yale/9780300209907.001.0001 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
The Power of Promises: Rethinking Indian Treaties in the Pacific Northwest
Whaley, G. H. (2010) · Ethnohistory · doi:10.1215/00141801-2009-069 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Whale Politics and Green Legitimacy: A Critique of the Anti-Whaling Campaign
Kalland, A. (1993) · Anthropology Today · doi:10.2307/2783216 · Cited by 43 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Shifting from a model of industrial resource management more towards marine conservation (Birnie, 1985; Kalland, 1993, 2009; Stone, 2001), the Commission also decided to take on a more active role in the management of Indigenous whaling practices.”
(1985) · Oceana Publications eBooks · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Native American Whalemen and the World: Indigenous Encounters and the Contingency of Race
Shoemaker, N. (2015) · doi:10.5149/northcarolina/9781469622576.001.0001 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Unveiling the Whale: Discourses on Whales and Whaling
Kalland, A. (2009) · doi:10.2307/j.ctt9qd9tk · Cited by 36
Becoming common plantain: metaphor, settler responsibility, and decolonizing tourism
Stinson, M. J., Grimwood, B. S. R., & Caton, K. (2020) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2020.1734605 · Cited by 32 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As a white 1 Nordic political ecologist, in my approach, I take inspiration from the idea of “ becoming common plantain ” , as theorised by Kimmerer (2013) and Stinson et al. (2021).”
EXTINCTION AND THE END OF FUTURES*
JØRGENSEN, D. (2022) · History and Theory · doi:10.1111/hith.12258 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Sakakibara, C. (2020) · University of Arizona Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1595kz4 · Cited by 25 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For many whaling communities, whales and whaling hold important roles in the processes of social and cultural reproduction (Kalland, 2009; Coté, 2010; Reid, 2015; Durney, 2020, 2024; Sakakibara, 2020).”
I Felt So White: Sámi Racialization, Indigeneity, and Shades of Whiteness
Dankertsen, A. (2019) · Native American and Indigenous Studies · doi:10.5749/natiindistudj.6.2.0110 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
BARSTOW, R. (1990) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.1990.tb00104.x · Cited by 12 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The campaign to Save the Whales , which gained momentum in the early 1970s, was one of the first globally organised environmental movements to emerge from the growing awareness around pollution, climate change and animal welfare issues (Barstow, 1990; Allen, 2014).”
From exploitation to adoration
Allen, S. J. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139018166.004 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
I Felt So White: Sámi Racialization, Indigeneity, and Shades of Whiteness
Dankertsen, A. (2019) · Native American and Indigenous Studies · doi:10.1353/nai.2019.a755894 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission: effective local management of a subsistence resource
Huntington, H. P. (1989) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.39803 · Cited by 7 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The North Slope communities were both upset and disappointed upon receiving the news of the IWC ’ s decision (Adams, 1982 as cited in Huntington, 1989).”
InfluentialDurney, F. (2020) · Environment and Society · doi:10.3167/ares.2020.110104 · Cited by 7 · cited 4× · see citing works
“For many whaling communities, whales and whaling hold important roles in the processes of social and cultural reproduction (Kalland, 2009; Coté, 2010; Reid, 2015; Durney, 2020, 2024; Sakakibara, 2020).”
InfluentialCulture Clash: The Influence of Indigenous Cultures on the International Whaling Regime
Creason, A. M. (2004) · bepress Legal Repository · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Chrono-Controversy: The Makah’s Campaign to Resume the Whale Hunt
Brigham, M. P. (2016) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570314.2016.1242023 · Cited by 6 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…(see Coté, 2010; Reid, 2015; Shoemaker, 2015), and b. been criticised for reproducing the idea of the “ tribal slot ” by trapping customary practice in a static state of “ authenticity ” dictated by colonial imaginaries (see Trouillot, 1991; Li, 2000; Muehlmann, 2009; Brigham, 2017; Durney, 2020).”
(2017) · bepress Legal Repository · Cited by 3 · see citing works
International Whaling Commission as a Natural Resource Management Regime
Viikari, L. (2022) · International Journal on Minority and Group Rights · doi:10.1163/15718115-bja10092 · Cited by 3 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The addresses act as an entry point to a discussion about extinction and the entangled relationship between whaling governance and Indigenous practices and livelihoods (for more, see Viikari, 2022a, 2022b; Åman, 2023).”
Durney, F. (2024) · Anthropological Quarterly · doi:10.1353/anq.2024.a923086 · Cited by 3 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For many whaling communities, whales and whaling hold important roles in the processes of social and cultural reproduction (Kalland, 2009; Coté, 2010; Reid, 2015; Durney, 2020, 2024; Sakakibara, 2020).”
Viikari, L. (2022) · Nordic Journal of Human Rights · doi:10.1080/18918131.2022.2045054 · Cited by 2 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The addresses act as an entry point to a discussion about extinction and the entangled relationship between whaling governance and Indigenous practices and livelihoods (for more, see Viikari, 2022a, 2022b; Åman, 2023).”
Asdal, K., & Reinertsen, H. (2022) · doi:10.4135/9781036231927
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Trouillot, 1991, Recapturing Anthropology, 17
- Coté, 2010, Spirits of our Whaling Ancestors: Revitilizing Makah and Nuu-Chah-Nulth Traditions
- Åman, S (2023) Governing the People of the Whale: History and Politics of Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling. PhD dissertation, Department of Culture Studies and Oriental Languages, University of Oslo, Oslo.
- Roman, 2006, Whale
- Freeman, 2001, Toward a Sustainable Whaling Regime, 123
- International Whaling Commission (2018b) IWC67 - Day 2 (International Whaling Commission), video recording of IWC proceedings. Available on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLu5U7nt3Zo&list=PLG6rqLl_ABObX6uKS3fX3N6FtZ2Yz-2zO&index=11.
- Roberts, 2010, Treaty rights ignored: Neocolonialism and the Makah whale hunt, The Kenyon Review, 31, 78
- Bird, 2017, Extinction Studies: Stories of Time, Death, and Generations
- Friedheim, 2001, (ed.), Toward a Sustainable Whaling Regime, 3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Menschenrechtsaspekte des indigenen Subsistenzwalfangs
Sellheim, N., & Lefevre, J. (2025) · Natur + Recht · doi:10.1007/s10357-025-4513-5
- Authors
- Åman, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Åman, Sonja
- ORCID
- Åman, Sonja
- Venue
- Cambridge Prisms: Extinction
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- e10-e10
- ISSN
- 2755-0958 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11895709
- OpenAlex
- W4402371777
- Semantic Scholar
- a106a0a1e228c71d012320d68aa55a5e0dd47754
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cambridge Prisms Extinction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Research Council (803211)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
- Keywords
- International Whaling Commission, bowhead whale, extinction, indigenous autonomy, cetacean conservation, global environmental governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-26.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-26.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review