International management of whales and whaling: an historical review of the regulation of commercial and aboriginal subsistence whaling
Open accessAbstract
The exploitation of whales has spread over the centuries from coastal to international waters, and from pole to pole. Despite the successive depletion of one species and stock after another, not until the 20th century were attempts instituted to regulate the industry and the catches at an international level. Agreements among the whaling companies competing in the Antarctic in the 1930s were closely followed by intergovernmental agreements, culminating in the 1946 International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, which established the International Whaling Commission. In 1975 the commission adopted its "new management procedure" for commercial whaling, based on the concept of maximum sustainable yield. A separate but related management procedure for subsistence whaling operations was subsequently developed, largely because of the problems of the Alaskan bowhead hunt. This gave greater weight to the perceived dependence of the native communities on the hunt than to the status of the whale stock. The tensions between the objectives of the conservation of the whale resources and the orderly development of the whaling industry continue today. Commercial whaling is for the moment prohibited while a comprehensive assessment of stock status and trends is undertaken, together with the development of a revised management procedure. The impact of recent legislative thinking in the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, coastal state sovereignty, and the developing trend towards the precautionary principle of management has caused profound changes in the interpretation and application of the 1946 convention and the consequent management policies by which it is implemented.Key words: aboriginal, bowhead, conservation, exploitation, International Whaling Commission, management, regulation, subsistence, whaling
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The IWC bowhead quota is partially determined by community need and partially on the status of and risks to the bowhead whale population.
“The IWC bowhead quota is partially determined by community need and partially on the status of and risks to the bowhead whale population (Gambell, 1993).”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Gambell, 1993
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- ADAMS, J. 1982. History and function of the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission. In: Albert, T.F., Kelley, J.J., and Dronenburg, R., eds. Proceedings of the First Conference on the Biology of the Bowhead Whale, Bahena mysticetus: Population Assessment. Barrow, Alaska: Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission. 9-13.
- CHAPMAN, D.G., ALLEN, K.R., and HOLT, S.J. 1964. Reports of the Committee of Three Scientists on the Special Scientific Investigation of the Antarctic Whale Stocks. Report of the International Whaling Commission 14:32-106. HISTORICAL REVIEW OF WHALING REGULATION / 107
- GAMBELL, R. 1973. Some effects of exploitation on reproduction in whales. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement 19531-551.
- -. 1982. The bowhead whale problem and the International Whaling Commission. Report of the International Whaling Commission, Special Issue -. 1983. Bowhead whales and Alaskan Eskimos: A problem of survival. Polar Record 21(134):467-473.
- MARQUETTE, W.M., and BOCKSTOCE, J.R. 1980. Historical shore-based catch of bowhead whales in the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort seas. Marine Fisheries Review 42(9-10):5-19.
- McHUGH, J.L. 1974. The role and history of the International Whaling Commission. In: Schevill, W.E., ed. The whale problem: A status report. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 305-335.
- OMURA, H. 1984. History of gray whales in Japan. In: Jones, M.L., Swartz, S.L., and Leatherwood, S., eds. The gray whale Eschn'chtius robustus. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press. 57-77.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
York, A. M., Zdor, E., BurnSilver, S., Degai, T., Monakhova, M., Isakova, S., Petrov, A. N., & Kempf, M. (2022) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Åman, S. (2024) · Cambridge Prisms: Extinction · doi:10.1017/ext.2024.14
“For more details, see Gambell (1993).”
- Authors
- Gambell, R.
- Affiliations
- International Whaling Commission (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gambell, Ray
- Venue
- ARCTIC
- Published
- 1993-01-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0004-0843 (ISSN-L)
- 1923-1245
- OpenAlex
- W1987658437
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 9.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- ARCTIC (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Maritime Law Issues
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Keywords
- whaling regulation, commercial whaling, subsistence whaling, International Whaling Commission, maximum sustainable yield, Alaska, whale conservation, stock assessment, law of the sea, coastal state sovereignty, precautionary principle, whaling history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review