The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cluster-based reduced-order modelling of a mixing layer
Open accessAbstract
We propose a novel cluster-based reduced-order modelling (CROM) strategy for unsteady flows. CROM combines the cluster analysis pioneered in Gunzburger’s group (Burkardt, Gunzburger & Lee,Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng, vol. 196, 2006 a, pp. 337–355) and transition matrix models introduced in fluid dynamics in Eckhardt’s group (Schneider, Eckhardt & Vollmer,Phys. Rev. E, vol. 75, 2007, art. 066313). CROM constitutes a potential alternative to POD models and generalises the Ulam–Galerkin method classically used in dynamical systems to determine a finite-rank approximation of the Perron–Frobenius operator. The proposed strategy processes a time-resolved sequence of flow snapshots in two steps. First, the snapshot data are clustered into a small number of representative states, called centroids, in the state space. These centroids partition the state space in complementary non-overlapping regions (centroidal Voronoi cells). Departing from the standard algorithm, the probabilities of the clusters are determined, and the states are sorted by analysis of the transition matrix. Second, the transitions between the states are dynamically modelled using a Markov process. Physical mechanisms are then distilled by a refined analysis of the Markov process, e.g. using finite-time Lyapunov exponent (FTLE) and entropic methods. This CROM framework is applied to the Lorenz attractor (as illustrative example), to velocity fields of the spatially evolving incompressible mixing layer and the three-dimensional turbulent wake of a bluff body. For these examples, CROM is shown to identify non-trivial quasi-attractors and transition processes in an unsupervised manner. CROM has numerous potential applications for the systematic identification of physical mechanisms of complex dynamics, for comparison of flow evolution models, for the identification of precursors to desirable and undesirable events, and for flow control applications exploiting nonlinear actuation dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
On Information and Sufficiency
Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · Cited by 20,193
Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow
Lorenz, E. N. (1963) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:dnf>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 19,398
Least squares quantization in PCM
Lloyd, S. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1982.1056489 · Cited by 15,836
(2007) · doi:10.5555/1283383.1283494 · Cited by 7,364
Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set Via the Gap Statistic
Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., & Hastie, T. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00293 · Cited by 6,205
Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data
SCHMID, P. J. (2010) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112010001217 · Cited by 5,915
Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction
Moore, B. (1981) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1981.1102568 · Cited by 5,282
Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra
Meyer, C. (2000) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719512 · Cited by 3,565
On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers
Brown, G. L., & Roshko, A. (1974) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s002211207400190x · Cited by 3,410
Cited by
Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics
Brunton, S. L., Noack, B. R., & Koumoutsakos, P. (2020) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 · Cited by 3,063
Self-citationModal Analysis of Fluid Flows: An Overview
Taira, K., Brunton, S. L., Dawson, S. T. M., Rowley, C. W., Colonius, T., McKeon, B. J., Schmidt, O. T., Gordeyev, S., Theofilis, V., & Ukeiley, L. S. (2017) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j056060 · Cited by 1,894
Data-Driven Science and Engineering: Machine Learning, Dynamical Systems, and Control
Brunton, S. L., & Kutz, J. N. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108380690 · Cited by 1,154
Dynamic Mode Decomposition and Its Variants
Schmid, P. J. (2022) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-030121-015835 · Cited by 640
Closed-Loop Turbulence Control: Progress and Challenges
Brunton, S. L., & Noack, B. R. (2015) · Applied Mechanics Reviews · doi:10.1115/1.4031175 · Cited by 623
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaiser, E., Noack, B. R., Cordier, L., Spohn, A., Segond, M., Abel, M., Daviller, G., Östh, J., Krajnović, S., & Niven, R. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-08-06
- Volume
- 754
- Pages
- 365-414
- ISSN
- 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7645
- OpenAlex
- W2134692705
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 7.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cluster-based reduced-order modelling of a mixing layer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/jfm.2014.355
- The paper
- Kaiser, E., Noack, B. R., Cordier, L., Spohn, A., Segond, M., Abel, M., Daviller, G., Östh, J., Krajnović, S., & Niven, R. K. (2014). Cluster-based reduced-order modelling of a mixing layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.355
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.