Cited by 27Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Deficit in rewarding mechanisms and prefrontal left/right cortical effect in vulnerability for internet addiction

Balconi, Michela, Finocchiaro, Roberta·2016·Acta Neuropsychiatrica

Abstract

Objective The present research explored the cortical correlates of rewarding mechanisms and cortical 'unbalance' effect in internet addiction (IA) vulnerability. Methods Internet Addiction Inventory (IAT) and personality trait (Behavioural Inhibition System, BIS; Behavioural Activation System, BAS) were applied to 28 subjects. Electroencephalographic (EEG, alpha frequency band) and response times (RTs) were registered during a Go-NoGo task execution in response to different online stimuli: gambling videos, videogames or neutral stimuli. Higher-IAT (more than 50 score, with moderate or severe internet addiction) and lower-IAT ( Results Alpha band and RTs were affected by IAT, with significant bias (reduced RTs) for high-IAT in response to gambling videos and videogames; and by BAS, BAS-Reward subscale (BAS-R), since not only higher-IAT, but also BAS and BAS-R values determined an increasing of left prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity (alpha reduction) in response to videogames and gambling stimuli for both Go and NoGo conditions, in addition to decreased RTs for these stimuli categories. Conclusion The increased PFC responsiveness and the lateralisation (left PFC hemisphere) effect in NoGo condition was explained on the basis of a 'rewarding bias' towards more rewarding cues and a deficit in inhibitory control in higher-IAT and higher-BAS subjects. In contrast lower-IAT and lower-BAS predicted a decreased PFC response and increased RTs for NoGo (inhibitory mechanism). These resul…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/neu.2016.9

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many works have found an impairment of inhibitory control in relation to internet addiction (Balconi et al., 2016; Dong, et al. 2017; Jeromin et al., 2016; Jiang et al., 2017; Littel et al., 2012; Tekin et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2017b; Xing, et al., 2014; Yao et al., 2014).

    “Muchos trabajos han encontrado una afectación del control inhibitorio en relación con la adicción a internet (Balconi et al., 2016; Dong, et al. 2017; Jeromin et al., 2016; Jiang et al., 2017; Littel et al., 2012; Tekin et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2017b; Xing, et al., 2014; Yao et al., 2014)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balconi, M., & Finocchiaro, R.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Balconi, Michela
Venue
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Published
2016-03-09
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
272-285
ISSN
  • 0924-2708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1601-5215
OpenAlex
W2298790116
Cited by
27
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neuropsychiatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
internet addiction, prefrontal cortex, behavioral inhibition system, behavioural activation system, inhibitory control, alpha band, reaction time (psychology), video games, go/no-go task, personality traits
MeSH terms
Adult, Electroencephalography, Female, Gambling, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Reward, Behavior, Addictive, Prefrontal Cortex, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review