Cited by 59Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatment

Pharmacological treatments for social anxiety disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Williams, Taryn, McCaul, Michael, Schwarzer, Guido, Cipriani, Andrea, Stein, Dan J, Ipser, Jonathan·2020·Acta Neuropsychiatrica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was to provide a systematic review and update on the pharmacotherapy of social anxiety disorder (SAD), including the efficacy and tolerability of these agents, the ranking of interventions, and the grading of results by quality of evidence. METHODS: The Common Mental Disorder Controlled Trial Register and two trial registries were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any pharmacological intervention or placebo in the treatment of SAD. We performed a standard pairwise meta-analysis using a random effects model and carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using the statistical package, R. Quality of evidence was also assessed. RESULTS: We included 67 RCTs in the review and 21 to 45 interventions in the NMA. Paroxetine was most effective in the reduction of symptom severity as compared to placebo. Superior response to treatment was also observed for paroxetine, brofaromine, bromazepam, clonazepam, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, phenelzine, and sertraline. Higher dropout rates were found for fluvoxamine. Brofaromine, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, pregabalin, sertraline, and venlafaxine performed worse in comparison to placebo for the outcome of dropouts due to adverse events. Olanzapine yielded a relatively high rank for treatment efficacy and buspirone the worse rank for dropouts due to any cause. CONCLUSION: The differences between drugs and placebo were small, apart from a significant reduction in symptom severity and response for paroxetine. We suggest paroxetine as a first-line treatment of SAD, with the consideration of future research on the drug olanzapine as well as brofaromine, bromazepam, clonazepam, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, phenelzine, and sertraline because we observed a response to treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/neu.2020.6

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, T., McCaul, M., Schwarzer, G., Cipriani, A., Stein, D. J., & Ipser, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
Corresponding author
Williams, Taryn
Venue
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Published
2020-02-10
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
169-176
ISSN
  • 0924-2708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1601-5215
OpenAlex
W3006121501
Cited by
59
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neuropsychiatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, pharmacotherapy, paroxetine, first-line therapy, treatment efficacy, tolerability, adverse events, drug ranking, olanzapine, buspirone, benzodiazepines, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, pregabalin, venlafaxine, fluvoxamine, escitalopram, sertraline, phenelzine, brofaromine
MeSH terms
Network Meta-Analysis, Phobia, Social, Adult, Humans, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review