Cited by 77

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Indigenous Values and Methods in Archaeological Practice: Low-Impact Archaeology Through the Kashaya Pomo Interpretive Trail Project

Gonzalez, Sara L.·2016·American Antiquity

Abstract

As federally and non-federally recognized tribal communities assert control over the management of tribal heritage, there is a significant opportunity to work with these nations to further refine and develop approaches to archaeological practice that work for the long-term care and protection of tribal heritage. This article evaluates the methodological implications of integrating indigenous values and cultural protocols into archaeological practice and tribal historic preservation. Drawing upon the example of the Kashaya Pomo Interpretive Trail Project at Fort Ross State Historic Park, I examine how respectful, engaged, community-based dialogue with the Kashia Band of Pomo Indians led to the development of a lowimpact archaeological methodology that contributes to the capacity of the Kashia Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) to employ archaeology as a tool of historic preservation. Although this methodology was developed with specific reference to the needs and cultural protocols of the Kashaya Pomo, it provides a salient model of a sovereignty-based approach to tribal historic preservation that may be relevant to other tribal heritage managers. The application of a suite of low-impact survey methods, including the catch-and-release surface collection strategy, also provides tribal and nontribal heritage professionals with additional tools for recovering data from cultural resources with minimal impact.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7183/0002-7316.81.3.533

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A growing body of scholarship has demonstrated how research based in community values and knowledge can drive and enrich the production of both community and academic knowledge.

    “Contrary to critiques about the rigor of Indigenous archaeologies as social projects that do not contribute to academic knowledge production (e.g., McGhee 2008McGhee , 2010)), a growing body of scholarship has demonstrated how research based in community values and knowledge can drive and enrich the production of both community and academic knowledge (e.g., Cipolla et al. 2019;Croes 2010;Gonzalez”

    From Archaeology and Social Justice in Native America (2022) · cites this paper as Gonzalez 2016

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gonzalez, S. L.
Venue
American Antiquity
Published
2016-07
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
533-549
ISSN
  • 0002-7316
  • 2325-5064
Cited by
77
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review