The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Pathways to Participation
Abstract
The premise of this article is that adult participation in politics is affected by strong preadult forces in addition to the contemporaneous factors emphasized by recent studies. To test this premise, data are drawn from the 1965–1973 national socialization panel study of young Americans and their parents. Four causal models depicting pathways to participation among young adults are evaluated; each includes civic orientations as intervening variables. Three of the models assess the direct and indirect effects of parental characteristics—socioeconomic status, political activity, and civic orientations. The fourth model assesses the impact of adolescent involvement in high school activities. Taken individually, each pathway is shown to have an effect on adult participation, with parent socioeconomic status and high school activism having the most impact. When the four pathways are combined in a single model to reflect the connections among them, all remain important. The combined model illustrates the importance of a variety of methods of political learning. The combined model also demonstrates the crucial role of civic orientations in converting preadult experiences into later participation. Civic orientations are the primary carriers of preadult political learning. Overall, the results rebut the critics of socialization research who have questioned the existence of a linkage between early learning and adult political behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Homemade citizens: The development of political interest during adolescence and young adulthood
Neundorf, A., Smets, K., & García-Albacete, G. M. (2013) · Acta Politica · doi:10.1057/ap.2012.23 · Cited by 208
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781108923323 · Cited by 175
Beaumont, E. (2010) · Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth · doi:10.1002/9780470767603.ch20 · Cited by 147
Cheng, Y., Liang, J., & Leung, L. (2015) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444814521362 · Cited by 129
Dassonneville, R., Quintelier, E., Hooghe, M., & Claes, E. (2012) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2012.695265 · Cited by 127
Self-Confidence and Gender Gaps in Political Interest, Attention, and Efficacy
Wolak, J. (2020) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/708644 · Cited by 117
Soldiers to Citizens: The Link between Military Service and Volunteering
Nesbit, R., & Reingold, D. A. (2011) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02307.x · Cited by 55
A scoping review of the green parenthood effect on environmental and climate engagement
Shrum, T. R., Platt, N. S., Markowitz, E., & Syropoulos, S. (2023) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.818 · Cited by 51
Motherhood and environmental activism: A developmental framework
Logsdon-Conradsen, S. C., & Allred, S. L. (2010) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2010.0027 · Cited by 17
Huebner, C. (2021) · Parliamentary Affairs · doi:10.1093/pa/gsab017 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Beck, P. A., & Jennings, M. K.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1982-03-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 94-108
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103029551
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.