The Other Divide
Abstract
There is little doubt that increasing polarization over the last decade has transformed the American political landscape. In The Other Divide, Yanna Krupnikov and John Barry Ryan challenge the nature and extent of that polarization. They find that more than party, Americans are divided by involvement in politics. On one side is a group of Americans who are deeply involved in politics and very expressive about their political views; on the other side is a group much less involved in day-to-day political outcomes. While scholars and journalists have assumed that those who are most vocal about their political views are representative of America at large, they are in fact a relatively small group whose voices are amplified by the media. By considering the political differences between the deeply involved and the rest of the American public, Krupnikov and Ryan present a broader picture of the American electorate than the one that often appears in the news.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Trafficking in hatred and the politics of provocation and backlash breeds political disengagement, placing the fate of democracy in the hands of a small, non-representative subset of citizens.
“The latter style breeds political disengagement244, placing the fate of democracy in the hands of a small, non-representative subset of citizens.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [244]
Cites
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · see citing works
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034 · Cited by 3,317 · see citing works
Park, C. L. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018301 · Cited by 3,174 · see citing works
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038 · Cited by 2,748 · see citing works
The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology
(2009) · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.001.0001 · Cited by 2,696 · see citing works
Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12152 · Cited by 2,452 · see citing works
Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity
Mason, L. (2018) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001 · Cited by 1,985 · see citing works
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804840115 · Cited by 1,863 · see citing works
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228 · Cited by 1,845 · see citing works
Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics
Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802331 · Cited by 910 · see citing works
How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It
Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., & Torres, M. (2018) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12357 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Revisiting the Conceptualization, Measurement, and Generation of Interest
RENNINGER, K. A., & HIDI, S. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587723 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2020) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
<i>Knock, Knock</i> . Who's There? The Imagined Audience
Litt, E. (2012) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Political News in the News Feed: Learning Politics from Social Media
Bode, L. (2016) · Mass Communication and Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1045149 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization
Rogowski, J. C., & Sutherland, J. L. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9323-7 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America
Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-01012-5 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial Network Sites and Well-Being: The Role of Social Connection
Clark, J. L., Algoe, S. B., & Green, M. C. (2018) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721417730833 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling as implicit emotion regulation
Torre, J. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2018) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073917742706 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Burrow, A. L., & Rainone, N. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.005 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
(Mis)perceptions of Partisan Polarization in the American Public
Levendusky, M. S., & Malhotra, N. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfv045 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Information equivalence in survey experiments
Dafoe, A., Zhang, B., & Caughey, D. (2018) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2018.9 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Ledbetter, A. M., Mazer, J. P., DeGroot, J. M., Meyer, K. R., Mao, Y., & Swafford, B. (2011) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650210365537 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Consumer Demand for Cynical and Negative News Frames
Trussler, M., & Soroka, S. (2014) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161214524832 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Civic Education and Political Participation
Galston, W. A. (2003) · Phi Delta Kappan · doi:10.1177/003172170308500108 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Attachment theory as a framework for explaining engagement with Facebook
Hart, J., Nailling, E., Bizer, G. Y., & Collins, C. K. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.016 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
The Incidental Pundit: Who Talks Politics with Whom, and Why?
Minozzi, W., Song, H., Lazer, D. M. J., Neblo, M. A., & Ognyanova, K. (2020) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12469 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
The Inseparability of Race and Partisanship in the United States
Westwood, S. J., & Peterson, E. (2022) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09648-9 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Are there still limits on partisan prejudice?
Westwood, S. J., Peterson, E., & Lelkes, Y. (2019) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfz034 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
A review and provocation: On polarization and platforms
Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231161880 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Argyle, L. P., Bail, C. A., Busby, E. C., Gubler, J. R., Howe, T., Rytting, C., Sorensen, T., & Wingate, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2311627120 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Measuring affective polarization: Matching concepts to measures
Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2026) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.70152 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B.
- Affiliations
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2022-01-19
- OpenAlex
- W4205148905
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 9 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 44.43
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- political polarization, political participation, media amplification, American electorate, political representation, partisanship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
