Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data
Abstract
We present a new way of extracting policy positions from political texts that treats texts not as discourses to be understood and interpreted but rather, as data in the form of words. We compare this approach to previous methods of text analysis and use it to replicate published estimates of the policy positions of political parties in Britain and Ireland, on both economic and social policy dimensions. We “export” the method to a non-English-language environment, analyzing the policy positions of German parties, including the PDS as it entered the former West German party system. Finally, we extend its application beyond the analysis of party manifestos, to the estimation of political positions from legislative speeches. Our “language-blind” word scoring technique successfully replicates published policy estimates without the substantial costs of time and labor that these require. Furthermore, unlike in any previous method for extracting policy positions from political texts, we provide uncertainty measures for our estimates, allowing analysts to make informed judgments of the extent to which differences between two estimated policy positions can be viewed as significant or merely as products of measurement error.We thank Raj Chari, Gary King, Michael McDonald, Gail McElroy, and three anonymous reviewers for comments on drafts of this paper.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One method for scaling political actors using texts, based on Laver, Benoit, and Garry (2003), is a supervised method, analogous to dictionary methods, to situate actors in space based on their words.
“One method, based on Laver, Benoit, and Garry (2003), is a supervised method-analogous to dictionary methods-to situate actors in space based on their words.”
From Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013) · cites this paper as Laver, Benoit, and Garry 2003
By defining liberal and conservative using only reference texts, Laver, Benoit, and Garry (2003) conflate ideological language with stylistic differences across authors and impose the ideological dominance assumption on the texts.
“By defining “liberal” and “conservative” using only reference texts, Laver, Benoit, and Garry (2003) conflate ideological language with stylistic differences across authors and impose the ideological dominance assumption on the texts.”
From Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013) · cites this paper as Laver, Benoit, and Garry 2003
Laver, Benoit, and Garry (2003) introduced a fully automated method for scaling political actors, wordscores, rather than relying on manual coding or dictionary methods.
“Rather than rely on difficult to replicate and hard to validate manual coding or dictionary methods, Laver, Benoit, and Garry (2003) introduced a fully automated method for scaling political actors: wordscores.”
From Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013) · cites this paper as Laver, Benoit, and Garry 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts
Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mps028 · Cited by 3,297 · see citing works
Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach
Schwartz, H. A., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kern, M. L., Dziurzynski, L., Ramones, S. M., Agrawal, M., Shah, A., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., Seligman, M. E. P., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073791 · Cited by 1,700 · see citing works
A Scaling Model for Estimating Time‐Series Party Positions from Texts
Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S. (2008) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00338.x · Cited by 684 · see citing works
How to analyze political attention with minimal assumptions and costs
Quinn, K. M., Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M., Crespin, M. H., & Radev, D. R. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00427.x · Cited by 671 · see citing works
Affective News: The Automated Coding of Sentiment in Political Texts
Young, L., & Soroka, S. (2012) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.671234 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M. P., & Quinn, K. M. (2008) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpn018 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J. M., & Taddy, M. (2019) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta16566 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Large-Scale Computerized Text Analysis in Political Science: Opportunities and Challenges
Wilkerson, J., & Casas, A. (2017) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-052615-025542 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Lowe, W. (2008) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpn004 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J., & Taddy, M. (2016) · doi:10.3386/w22423 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
U.S. Treaty Making with American Indians: Institutional Change and Relative Power, 1784–1911
Spirling, A. (2012) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00558.x · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Sustainable Supplier Evaluation: From Current Criteria to Reconstruction Based on ESG Requirements
Lou, S., You, X., & Xu, T. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020757 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Content Analysis Using Specific Natural Language Processing Methods for Big Data
Pirnau, M., Botezatu, M. A., Priescu, I., Hosszu, A., Tabusca, A., Coculescu, C., & Oncioiu, I. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13030584 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- LAVER, M., BENOIT, K., & GARRY, J.
- Affiliations
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- University of Reading (GB)
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 02
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2009659525
- Cited by
- 1,377
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 84
- FWCI
- 112.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
- Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- political parties, party manifestos, parliamentary speeches, economic policy, social policy, uncertainty measures, measurement error, German party system, PDS, replication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review