Cited by 99Indigenous Cultures and HistoryAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsIndigenous Peoples' Rights and Law

U.S. Treaty Making with American Indians: Institutional Change and Relative Power, 1784–1911

Spirling, Arthur·2012·American Journal of Political Science

Abstract

Native Americans are unique among domestic actors in that their relations with the U.S. government involve treaty making, with almost 600 such documents signed between the Revolutionary War and the turn of the twentieth century. We investigate the effect of constitutional changes to the treating process in 1871, by which Congress stripped the president of his ability to negotiate directly with tribes. We construct a comprehensive new data set by digitizing all of the treaties for systematic textual analysis. Employing scaling techniques validated with word‐use information, we show that a single dimension characterizes the treaties as more or less “harsh” in land and resource cession terms. We find that specific institutional changes to treaty‐making mechanisms had little effect on agreement outcomes. Rather, it is the relative bargaining power of the United States economically and militarily that contributes to worsening terms for Indians over the nineteenth century.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00558.x

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spirling, A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Spirling, Arthur
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-14
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
84-97
ISSN
  • 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5907
OpenAlex
W2111878847
Cited by
98
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
18.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › American Constitutional Law and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Keywords
treaty-making, Native Americans, institutional change, relative power, bargaining power, territorial cession, 19th century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review