Cited by 318Political Influence and Corporate StrategiesCorruption and Economic DevelopmentElectoral Systems and Political Participation

MPs for Sale? Returns to Office in Postwar British Politics

Open access
EGGERS, ANDREW C., HAINMUELLER, JENS·2009·American Political Science Review

Abstract

Many recent studies show that firms profit from connections to influential politicians, but less is known about how much politicians financially benefit from wielding political influence. We estimate the returns to serving in Parliament, using original data on the estates of recently deceased British politicians. Applying both matching and a regression discontinuity design to compare Members of Parliament (MPs) with parliamentary candidates who narrowly lost, we find that serving in office almost doubled the wealth of Conservative MPs, but had no discernible financial benefits for Labour MPs. Conservative MPs profited from office largely through lucrative outside employment they acquired as a result of their political positions; we show that gaining a seat in Parliament more than tripled the probability that a Conservative politician would later serve as a director of a publicly traded firm—enough to account for a sizable portion of the wealth differential. We suggest that Labour MPs did not profit from office largely because trade unions collectively exerted sufficient control over the party and its MPs to prevent members from selling their services to other clients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003055409990190

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using a high-quality scanner and Optical Character Recognition software, it is possible to convert archival materials into computer readable texts.

    “using a highquality scanner and Optical Character Recognition software, it is possible to convert archival materials into computer readable texts (see e.g., the data collection process in Eggers and Hainmueller 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
EGGERS, A. C., & HAINMUELLER, J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • EGGERS, ANDREW C.
  • HAINMUELLER, JENS
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
2009-10-30
Volume
103
Issue
4
Pages
513-533
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W2113982033
Cited by
318
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
39.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
Members of Parliament, political influence, political connections, Conservative Party, Labour Party, trade unions, post-war British politics, wealth inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review